But the thread has developed into what it is.
Indeed in my first post to the OP, I pointed out that I felt the linked article was racist in tone.
I have to disagree
Nonsense, the word is unacceptable
True.
You see War you're argument is all over the place. You're basing it on what is you personally deem as 'cool' lingo on the streets of Lawndin inn't.
The people whom you describe as 'mulatto' are doing what black people did in the 60s/70s in the States with the N-word.
The are reclaiming the word because of it's racist undertones.
I'm surprised that you haven't realized that.
It's a racist term, but by using it to describe themselves they are deconstructing it of its racism.
I completely see this as a good thing. how and ever, if a white person called a mix-raced person a mulatto (you also used the word 'half-caste' which is incredibly offensive), then trouble would doubtlessly ensue and the person being spoken to/about would more than likely take offence.
It's still a racist word, just like the N-word is. But only certain people can use it, just like the N-word.
Simple.