Albanaich
7 Jan 2013
Language / Is rosetta stone any good for learning Polish? [51]
Hi
Yes and no. . . . . . . . . Rosetta is very good an enlarging your vocabulary, not so good at grammar (and Polish grammar is DIFFICULT) , Pimsleur will get you the basic's quickly, but you will have no vocabulary, Michel Thomas will give grammar and knowledge of the structure of the language, but like Pimsleur will be short on vocabularly.
Over the last 12 months I've used Rosetta, Collins, Pimsleur and now Michel Thomas. All of them (with the exception of Collins) take a different approach and have a different purpose.
Fast result - Pimsleur, its good for ordering drinks and finding the toilet - but not much else.
Enlarging the vocubulary and pronouciation - Rosetta Stone.
Getting a grip of structure and grammar - Michel Thomas
They should be done in that order.
The Michel Thomas is a bit of a revelation 'ah, that's how it all fits together' - but I am pretty sure I would not have got that feeling without the range of vocabulary learn from Rosetta.
The final stage is getting Polish language films (Three Colours and Walt Disney are good) and getting so you can follow the film without subtitles. When you find yourself ignoring the sub-titles you've just about cracked it. (that's when I knew I had cracked German, I haven't quite got to that stage in Polish)
I would agree with the comments about Rosetta Stone. You'll learn lots of words - but you won't know how to use them. Pimsleur and Michel Thomas are better for the reasons the youtube reviewer describes. You need three things in learning a language.
1. A basic feel for the language and how it sounds and works
2. Words - Vocabulary
3. How to fit everything together
No one program can to that - and if it did it would be an enormous project. As the reviewer (and anyone who has learned another language will tell you) you need to forced into situations where you are forced to use the language. Michel Thomas is particularly good at this, but if you haven't got a good vocabulary, then you won't have anything to say.
As the reviews says, one of the best ways to learn is in the car or waiting for the train, or situations where you have time. Computer based programs can't do that. Persistence is the key - you really have to be surrounded by the language. Like turning on Michel Thomas or Pimsleur while you are washing the dishes or cleaning the house. You find yourself answering questions and creating sentences to describe what you are doing instinctively. To do that you need words, and the only way to learn words is through the 'flash card' approach - which Rosettal Stone is a very sophisticated example of.
Hi
Yes and no. . . . . . . . . Rosetta is very good an enlarging your vocabulary, not so good at grammar (and Polish grammar is DIFFICULT) , Pimsleur will get you the basic's quickly, but you will have no vocabulary, Michel Thomas will give grammar and knowledge of the structure of the language, but like Pimsleur will be short on vocabularly.
Over the last 12 months I've used Rosetta, Collins, Pimsleur and now Michel Thomas. All of them (with the exception of Collins) take a different approach and have a different purpose.
Fast result - Pimsleur, its good for ordering drinks and finding the toilet - but not much else.
Enlarging the vocubulary and pronouciation - Rosetta Stone.
Getting a grip of structure and grammar - Michel Thomas
They should be done in that order.
The Michel Thomas is a bit of a revelation 'ah, that's how it all fits together' - but I am pretty sure I would not have got that feeling without the range of vocabulary learn from Rosetta.
The final stage is getting Polish language films (Three Colours and Walt Disney are good) and getting so you can follow the film without subtitles. When you find yourself ignoring the sub-titles you've just about cracked it. (that's when I knew I had cracked German, I haven't quite got to that stage in Polish)
I would agree with the comments about Rosetta Stone. You'll learn lots of words - but you won't know how to use them. Pimsleur and Michel Thomas are better for the reasons the youtube reviewer describes. You need three things in learning a language.
1. A basic feel for the language and how it sounds and works
2. Words - Vocabulary
3. How to fit everything together
No one program can to that - and if it did it would be an enormous project. As the reviewer (and anyone who has learned another language will tell you) you need to forced into situations where you are forced to use the language. Michel Thomas is particularly good at this, but if you haven't got a good vocabulary, then you won't have anything to say.
As the reviews says, one of the best ways to learn is in the car or waiting for the train, or situations where you have time. Computer based programs can't do that. Persistence is the key - you really have to be surrounded by the language. Like turning on Michel Thomas or Pimsleur while you are washing the dishes or cleaning the house. You find yourself answering questions and creating sentences to describe what you are doing instinctively. To do that you need words, and the only way to learn words is through the 'flash card' approach - which Rosettal Stone is a very sophisticated example of.