News /
Who controls Gazeta Wyborcza?? [216]
So, I chatted with a probable right-wing political type yesterday (can I stress that I am politically impartial, I really am).
I said to them: "Why do you dislike AM? He spent 7 years in jail opposing communism, did he not? Why the problem with him?"
The reply was: "He wrote books in prison, was given privileges. Why do you think that was?"
I responded: "He behaved well or all prisoners were given those privileges?"
They responded: "No, think about it."
I asked: "You don't think someone would suffer any period in jail for some sort of charade do you?"
They replied: "Yes."
My obvious reaction was one of disbelieving my own ears.
So, having looked into things since my last post, my own view is that Michnik seems fine to me. But, I also think Kuklinski was indeed closer to hero than anything negative, I definitely do not agree that he is a traitor. Neither did Clinton when he was the US president. Can anyone give me an impartial link that proves Kuklinski did it for lots of cash and not primarily for moral reasons? I do not agree that an oath sworn to the army has any validity when you have reason to believe you'd be promoting oppression of your own countrymen by not blowing the whistle. As a citizen, I would expect my servicemen to do what is best for my country and my freedoms, not keep to some oath just because it was sworn. That's like Nazis shooting prisoners because they promised they would. Doesn't make it right, doesn't make it anything other than murder.
Some quarters maintain that Kuklinski may even have prevented a serious war at that point in history - looks to me like they have a good point.
The CIA have an interesting (positive) page about him, as you might expect of course
cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol44no3/html/v44i3a03p.htm
Here's a 2 minute video about him
youtube.com/watch?v=oGKFM0Q_8f8
Here's a long, Polish documentary on him
youtube.com/watch?v=gfF4usEfTI0&feature=relmfu
I read (as best I can!) GW and looks pretty OK to me. Seems a bit childish at times with some of its criticisms, but no newspaper is perfect and am yet to find any journalist or editor anywhere in the world who has managed to do their job without offending someone somewhere.
I look at both sides - I have read GP and FP, as well as GW. The truth is out there - somewhere. Seems in this life what's true for someone is not always viewed as the plain truth by someone else. I used to think the truth was simply the truth, but experience has taught me people just don't always see it like that no matter how obvious it may be to others, and I probably will never know why.