PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / UK, Ireland  % width260

POLES SUPERIOR TO BRITS?


Matyjasz  2 | 1543  
3 May 2009 /  #211
It's all good.

Weird animation?
dannyboy  18 | 248  
3 May 2009 /  #212
When it comes to the question,which country had a bigger impact on the world, we could say without a doubt that Great Britain wins hands down. Which doesn't mean that Poles didn't have anything to be proud of, because we have.

Personally I'm surprised that so many of you took seriously this tread. I mean, common. The arguments ranged from polish women being good wives to Polish Kings policy towards religious minorities in XVI century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Woahh!

I think I know who is one of those PF freelancers who get paid by Admin for their contribution to PF.

Nicely summarised, imo.

Matyjasz, I didn't take the thread seriously, its just that sometimes it feels so nice to give some of the more arrogant Poles a taste of their own medicine :)

Sometimes, this is how I see Polish people:
Irishman: God, I love orange juice
Englishman: Me too, I love orange juice and I like apple juice
American: Yea, I love apple juice, don't love OJ tho
Australian: I don't like either, but I enjoy cranberry juice
French: I like all 3
German: I love all 3!
Polish: POLAND HAS THE BEST JUICE IN THE WORLD, RA RA RA. ALL OTHER JUICE IS SH1T COMPARED TO POLAND, RA RA RA. WHEN YOU DRINK POLISH JUICE, YOUR WHOLE BODY HAS NINE ORGASIMS, AND IF YOU DRINK NON-POLISH JUICE, YOUR TEETH ROT AND YOU SH1T YOURSELF INVOLUNTARILY, RA RA RA

;)
Rafal_1981  
3 May 2009 /  #213
dannyboy

so, basically, what you are saying is that Americans don't like orange juice? ;-]
Torq  
3 May 2009 /  #214
Polish: POLAND HAS THE BEST JUICE IN THE WORLD, RA RA RA. ALL OTHER JUICE IS SH1T COMPARED TO POLAND, RA RA RA. WHEN YOU DRINK POLISH JUICE, YOUR WHOLE BODY HAS NINE ORGASIMS, AND IF YOU DRINK NON-POLISH JUICE, YOUR TEETH ROT AND YOU SH1T YOURSELF INVOLUNTARILY, RA RA RA

But we all know that Poland DOES have the best juice in the world.

What's your point?

;-)
Matyjasz  2 | 1543  
3 May 2009 /  #215
But we all know that Poland DOES have the best juice in the world.

Plus those cardboard boxes. You can't beat a polish juice cardboard box. All the other cardboard boxes are inferior. I thought it was obvious.

You will have to come up with a different example, dannyboy. ;)
Piorun  - | 655  
3 May 2009 /  #216
B'fhearr liom liomanaid, beoir, uisce beatha
That's what I would say and I'm Polish
Wroclaw Boy  
3 May 2009 /  #217
You can't beat a polish juice cardboard box.

what the ones with all the angles.
Trevek  25 | 1699  
3 May 2009 /  #218
Weird animation?

cartoons and animated films about plasticine men being chased by skyscrapers etc.
dannyboy  18 | 248  
3 May 2009 /  #219
LOL, at least you guys have a sense of humour anyway, hahaha :D
Cheers

@Piorun, Ana mhaith ar fad, ach cheapim go bhful an uisce bheatha ufasach, an firsceal, ni maith liom aon alcol
(Bardzo dobry, ale mysle, ze whisky jest straszne, rzeczywiscie, ja nie lubie alkoholu )
freebird  3 | 532  
3 May 2009 /  #220
Maybe but Soviets would not be defeated either if alone while US would be probably defeated.

if we would be defeated then only because of logistics. Soviets wouldn't have to ship war equipment and troops over seas like we would. Simple is that. The only reason why Germans lost the war against the Soviets is because of dumba** Hitler trying to invade them in the Winter and not because of the military strength of the Soviets. I understand many of you guys still got that propaganda bulls*it about Soviets being invincible in your heads due to your pro Soviet education until 1989 but the truth is that Soviets wouldn't stand a chance to beat down the Germans without our help. No point to argue about it.
Ironside  50 | 12375  
3 May 2009 /  #221
en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suicide_(Suvorov)&oldid=274112551
freebird  3 | 532  
3 May 2009 /  #222
Ironside

Suvorov and your point is, sir? :-)
scrappleton  - | 829  
3 May 2009 /  #223
Remember the Soviets came relatively close to being defeated by Finland. This of course enboldened Hitler: he fired his top brass, pushed quickly east, took more and more Russian territory and extended his supply lines. It's unlikely (not implausible) but the US probably would not have made this kind mistake.

Soviets were eventually successful defending their own land in freezing tempertures. However, even today, once off the Steppe, I don't know how formidible they really are. Also, a large part of the US can be extremely cold and is not as daunting to a lot of US soldiers.
southern  73 | 7059  
3 May 2009 /  #224
of dumba** Hitler trying to invade them in the Winter and not because of the military strength of the Soviets.

The invasion started in the summer.Hitler was not a dumbass and used the element of surprise.
freebird  3 | 532  
3 May 2009 /  #225
Hitler was not a dumbass

no he wasn't just a dumba**, you're right about that, he was a freaking psycho. He made millions of people (including his own folk) unhappy. If he was so smart then why the hell he tried to invade so many countries at the same time? How stupid is that? lol
southern  73 | 7059  
3 May 2009 /  #226
then why the hell he tried to invade so many countries at the same time? How stupid is that? lol

Because he had to defeat them all.Think how much time Hitler had to achieve his goals before western allies and Soviet Union strengthened.
freebird  3 | 532  
3 May 2009 /  #227
Because he had to defeat them all.

lol, but not all at the same time. This is what I call stupid.
No doubt, Germans were very strong at that time but to start war with everybody around at the same time was just dumb.
Nathan  18 | 1349  
3 May 2009 /  #228
The invasion started in the summer.Hitler was not a dumbass and used the element of surprise

Soviet Union was planning attack on Germany a few days later.
southern  73 | 7059  
3 May 2009 /  #229
Not exactly attack.Maybe a shake down.
isthatu2  4 | 2692  
3 May 2009 /  #230
Ironside

Please stop calling Dannyboy "boyo",thats what Welsh people say,not Irish,if Dannyboy really was an Irish "Boyo" you'd have something to worry about old fella :)

pro Soviet education until 1989

What a pillock,What pro Soviet education do you imagaine was taught in NATO member states schools you muppet. Fact,80 % of arms shipped to the soviet union from the US were kept in storage untill the 1990s,still in origional US factory wrapping. You gave them shermans,the soviets thought they were crap and only used a handfull in the final stages of the war. The only advantage given by lend lease to the soviet union was in logistics,with the GMCs and Studabakers the soviets were able to get to Berlin in April 45,without them they would have been there a bit later. So taking your "what if " view of history,where the US ignored Hitlers declaration of war,I concede no Normandy landings,so therefore no "race for Berlin" ie,USSR could have taken its time and still crushed the nazis.
scrappleton  - | 829  
3 May 2009 /  #231
,What pro Soviet education do you imagaine was taught in NATO member states schools you muppet.

Poland was a NATO member before 1989? They didn't even join until 99'. He obviously meant prior to 1989. Ever seen a Polish May Day parade on the telly from the 80's?

Do you have an IV of booze going into your arm as you type on this thing? You really are quite the clown aren't you?
freebird  3 | 532  
3 May 2009 /  #232
What a pillock,What pro Soviet education do you imagaine was taught in NATO member states schools you muppet

did you even understand me?
It's a fact that Poland was pro Soviet and so was Polish education system obviously too.
Man, sometimes you just don't get those things right, :-)
isthatu2  4 | 2692  
3 May 2009 /  #233
did you even understand me?

very rarely Im afraid.......Seeing as at least half of the people in this debate who are stating the Soviets would have defeated the germans without Uncle Sams "help" were born and raised in Western Europe,ie NATO, I think its you who fails to understand things old bean.

Poland was a NATO member before 1989? They didn't even join until 99'. He obviously meant prior to 1989. Ever seen a Polish May Day parade on the telly from the 80's?

Do you have an IV of booze going into your arm as you type on this thing? You really are quite the clown aren't you?

HHmmm,read again fella, I suggest its you and freebird hooked upto a moonshine drip :) He may have meant just what you said,but he missed the point that the people he claimed lived under communism in the 8os did infact live in the free west....
scrappleton  - | 829  
3 May 2009 /  #234
you and freebird hooked upto a moonshine drip :)

A Brit suggesting someone else is an alcoholic? This thread is about GB / POLAND btw.
isthatu2  4 | 2692  
3 May 2009 /  #235
A Brit suggesting someone else is an alcoholic?

Im TT, took the pledge years ago fella.

This thread is about GB / POLAND btw

exactly,what are you doing here then Yank?
scrappleton  - | 829  
4 May 2009 /  #236
exactly,what are you doing here then Yank?

sipping moonshine apparently. Besides you're the one who keeps bringing us up in every thread you're involved in.
freebird  3 | 532  
4 May 2009 /  #237
I concede no Normandy landings,so therefore no "race for Berlin" ie,USSR could have taken its time and still crushed the nazis.

well, I'm saying, no western front and Soviets wouldn't stand a chance against Germans. Look even with our (allied forces) help how long it took so many countries to beat down the Nazis and now you're saying the Soviets would have done it themselves, no way man.
Nathan  18 | 1349  
4 May 2009 /  #238
Not exactly attack.Maybe a shake down

And it means..?
southern  73 | 7059  
4 May 2009 /  #239
Some artillery shell amd some border local advances.
Nathan  18 | 1349  
4 May 2009 /  #240
Where did you read that - "Love poems for adolescents"?

Archives - 2005-2009 / UK, Ireland / POLES SUPERIOR TO BRITS?Archived