PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / News  % width82

Third World War and the role of Poland


Puzzler  9 | 1088  
28 Oct 2007 /  #61
Bush spoke about the possibility of starting a Third world War with Russia, Iran and China in one side, and Israel, USA and UK in the other

- Did he really speak so? Can you give the source you got your news from?

what will be the role of poland?

- And who is supposed to direct the farce?
Kataryna  - | 36  
28 Oct 2007 /  #62
My brother is a US Pilot. He was in Iraq for 1 year. He flew and hung out with Polish Pilots and soldiers. He said that they are the best he's ever seen. A funny story to share:

One of his guys was in a mole hole in the black of night, it was a rather large hole, but he thought he was alone. He was getting fired at and crouched down. He pulled out a cigarette and tried to light it with a matche. The match blew out. He lit another one and again in blew out. A moment later, in a thick Polish accent, he heard a woman's voice say "don't do that again". He was in the hole with a woman Polish sniper and her spotter. I can just imagine his shock when he realized he wasn't alone and that he was sharing he hole with a very, very good shooter.

Thought I'd share.

Did he really speak so? Can you give the source you got your news from?

Not exactly what Bush said:

ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2007-10-17T183310Z_01_N17329743_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-IRAN-BUSH-COL.XML
joepilsudski  26 | 1387  
28 Oct 2007 /  #63
No, Bush would probably not come straight out and say such a thing; there is tremendous opposition to his gangster Iraqi policy in the US, and the feeling on the part of many Americans that we have become a puppet state of the Zionists...the UK is/has been since the beginning of the 20th Century...but consider this: there have been reports of a recent air strike by Israel on a Syrian nuclear facility...this has been reported by Haaretz (Israeli nespaper) and by some media in the states...Haaretz reported that Bush was aware of the attack, but pledged to keep quiet about it.
Crnogorac  3 | 111  
28 Oct 2007 /  #64
Only naive fools expect evenhandedness, impartiality and justice from the great powers.

Only naive fools.
tornado2007  11 | 2270  
28 Oct 2007 /  #65
churchill probably lost his tongue because he was fed up of warning people and falling on deaf ears :)
Crnogorac  3 | 111  
29 Oct 2007 /  #66
The truth is Churchill cared for nothing but Britain. The lives, homes and cultures of non-Britons he took and destroyed without a care or second thought. What sort of 'conservatism' requires the murder of millions of defenseless innocents? That Churchill committed war crimes—planned them, aided and abetted them, and defended them—is beyond doubt. Churchill was the prime subverter through two world wars of the rules of warfare that had evolved in the West over centuries. Winston Churchill was a man who along with Roosevelt, Hitler and Stalin, probed just how far Western Civilization could fall in just six short years of time.

Wedemeyer's remarks about Yugoslavia were on the mark. On this issue, Churchill rejected the advice of his own Foreign Office, depending instead on information provided especially by the head of the Cairo office of the SOE the Special Operations branch headed by a Communist agent named James Klugman. Churchill withdrew British support from the Loyalist guerrilla army of General Mihailovic and threw it to the Communist Partisan leader Tito. What a victory for Tito would mean was no secret to Churchill. When Fitzroy Maclean was interviewed by Churchill before being sent as liaison to Tito, Maclean observed that, under Communist leadership, the Partisans'

ultimate aim would undoubtedly be to establish in Jugoslavia a Communist regime closely linked to Moscow. How did His Majesty's Government view such an eventuality? . . . Mr. Churchill's reply left me in no doubt as to the answer to my problem. So long, he said, as the whole of Western civilization was threatened by the Nazi menace, we could not afford to let our attention be diverted from the immediate issue by considerations of long-term policy. . . . Politics must be a secondary consideration.

It would be difficult to think of a more frivolous attitude to waging war than considering "politics" to be a "secondary consideration."

Churchill threw British support to the Communist Partisan leader Tito. What a victory for Tito would mean was no secret to Churchill.

As for the "human costs" of Churchill's policy, when an aide pointed out that Tito intended to transform Yugoslavia into a Communist dictatorship on the Soviet model, Churchill retorted: "Do you intend to live there?"
orzel  - | 15  
2 Nov 2007 /  #67
How true. We are the america's sock puppet.
rychlik  41 | 372  
16 Aug 2008 /  #68
Yeah it will happen.
Babinich  1 | 453  
16 Aug 2008 /  #69
Winston Churchill was a man who along with Roosevelt, Hitler and Stalin, probed just how far Western Civilization could fall in just six short years of time.

:')
cnktr_pol  - | 4  
16 Aug 2008 /  #70
we were fighting together with Germans against Turkey

turkey and poland have never experienced a war in which they were against each other.. turkey is one of the biggest ally of poland.. turkey is the first country who supported the independence of poland after world war II.. etc etc.. don't inform people wrong and don't try to change their minds..

and I cannot understand that some polish people are still not against the war..! :S how you accept and expect a upcoming war? Who should die for what? Poland should not let USA and others play on them as politically and especially to create and to be a part of a war... terrible!!
Yanek  3 | 29  
16 Aug 2008 /  #71
You know, my dear friend, everything depends on what kind of neighbour you are?
Russian nation does not have fascist ideology in their mind. They have enough land and recources to live a very good life within their borders. The problem is that such

ideology USA has and some other European countries which still depend from Russia's resources.
If there will be any attempt to start such war, the Poland will not have any chance to survive! That is a real picture of this situation.

There is only one decision to save European continent from the war, for those countries which are surrounding Russia, to get a neutral status and forget about NATO and USA. I am confident that is going to be absolutelly right decision which increase security of these countries a lot.

People of the Poland do not play such dangerous games, because the result will be terrible.
joepilsudski  26 | 1387  
16 Aug 2008 /  #72
Third World War and the role of Poland

Very simple answer: Target & Patsy...unless the Polish leadership wises up.
Yanek, the EU and US are the political mechanism of the global banking apparatus (Rothschild & their satellites)...they want total world dominance...unfortunately, as the history of Bolshevism shows, these bankers also want Russia...and, although Putin has been able to contain them to a degree, these parasites are still powerful in Russia...Poland?...an afterthough to these scum, but they make money from Poland, too, with their AIG, their Allianz insurance/'securities' companies, their Starbucks, their hotel chains, their 'real estate development' etc....How good is the Polish economy with many Poles emmigrating to the Uk and other places in search of work?...How much of the Polish economy is in Polish hands...These are the big questions that must be asked.
eagle  - | 29  
16 Aug 2008 /  #73
Russia is weak

Don't know whether it's ignorance or sheer misguided bravado that makes you think/believe so. Either way you do so at your own peril. Russia's not weak militarily and as we can all see,atleast those realistic enough to do so it's on the economic rise as well. Ally yourself with whomever you want but also prepare yourselves for what this might,hope it never comes to this,befall you guys. I'm no prophet of doom though.Just being realistic. Amen.
Glaz  - | 1  
16 Aug 2008 /  #74
Poland is threatening a nuclear strike ineluctable.
The question is not worth it or not, the question is when and by whom will be struck.
Looking back over the U.S. war on the organization in Georgia can confidently say
will stand blow for the Americans, blow will be organized through third countries in which U.S.
have controlled regimes (such as in Georgia and Ukraine).
The aggressors will be exhibited Russia and this will be an occasion to the beginning of a third world war.
Yes abide with you god.
Piorun  - | 655  
16 Aug 2008 /  #75
Poland is threatening a nuclear strike ineluctable.

Can you write this in your native language because this sh** that you have posted in English and Polish is garbled. It makes no sense I have no idea what you are trying to say. There are some very talented people on this forum that will do the translation for you.
Ogorki  - | 114  
16 Aug 2008 /  #76
Never heared so much bollocks in my life.

Third World War and the role of Poland

...to die - just like everyone else.
craic_monster  1 | 44  
16 Aug 2008 /  #77
the biggest problem in the US currently is the banking system, which is owned by the Elites/Zionists

the EU and US are the political mechanism of the global banking apparatus (Rothschild & their satellites)...they want total world dominance

Joe, as you're clearly the rezydent expert on finance and banking, many of us, I am certain, would like to draw from the unquenchable fountain of your economic omniscience.

Firstly, I'm visiting Poland next month, so how many złoty should I expect for my euro?

Secondly, as I don't want to use any bank which might be tainted with the greasy fingers of "Elitism", might I be best rejecting that inestimably corrupt system altogether and reverting to the ancient principles of barter?
rychlik  41 | 372  
17 Aug 2008 /  #78
Are you suggesting that Poland is working along with the USA to start a WWIII conflict to over throw Russia for it's resources? Given the hardships it has faced in the past, why would Poland play a role in its own destruction? Go easy on the doomsday scenario. Not even Nostradamus was this bleak.
Yanek  3 | 29  
19 Aug 2008 /  #79
Yes, in most cases Poland does just things that look very bad: they simply trying "to bite" Russia "for something", that's why they lick star-striped ass as much as they can. You should understand that US wants to capture Russia by somebody else hands. So they trying to set up Europe as opposite site to Russia in the future conflict. It's funny, but it will not save americans in any case.....
Seanus  15 | 19666  
19 Aug 2008 /  #80
When is San Marino joining in with the butcher, the baker, and candlestick maker? I wanna see that. Well, at least they had such people when they played Scotland in the football.
vitold  - | 4  
20 Aug 2008 /  #81
IF YOU WOLD ASK GERMS THEY WOLG GIVE YOU THE SAME ANSWER.ITS AOR NEIGHBORLY LOVE
rychlik  41 | 372  
20 Aug 2008 /  #82
You should understand that US wants to capture Russia by somebody else hands. So they trying to set up Europe as opposite site to Russia in the future conflict.

So the dooms day scenario continues. You spend too much time on conspiracy theories. Are you saying you're smarter than everyone else and that the Poles are willing to get destroyed to help the USA? What does Poland have to gain by being in the middle of a war? You must be an insider to the American government. Or a Russian spy. I know this deal makes Poles feel uneasy but it'll pass. There might be another Cold War if anything.

Archives - 2005-2009 / News / Third World War and the role of PolandArchived