As have I on different forums. The amount of time that it would take for Warsaw to fall was unknown at the time of the attack. It is easier to say now there was not enough time, as we look back and see how things unfolded.
does not really change much if you ask me, it would have taken the time it took the Germans to invade Poland to build up a force big enough to attack Germany on any front. So whatever you say it does not really change much, even if the UK did make a full hearted effort to help Poland it would have been to late anyway.
But regardless of how..even after Poland fell to the Germans, nothing was done. Then France was attacked. The French are in the same boat, and they bordered Germany. There is a reason they called it the "Phony war". These were promises from France and England if Germany was to attack Poland, they were broken. England and France were our allies, and they never showed up. The entire Western German border was practically wide open, as Hitler concentrated all his forces on Poland. He gambled that France and England would not come to Polands aid, and he was right on the money. Later German generals went to say that they thought the idea was suicide. They practically had no forces between France to Berlin, guarding the German border.
Ok the first thing to say about that is the French were cowards, when the British went in to help the French, they were the ones who were surrendering all down the frontlines and leaving the BEF exposed on all sides!!!. To be honest with you the Belgians were not better either, the only force that stood up to Jerry were the British and that wasn't even in their own country at the time.
My second point is pretty simple, the British army had gone through a major 'downsizing' after WWI, therefore was in no sort of position to defend anybody at that point in time, add this to the fact the Germans were building their army while we were downsizing makes it an impossible, infeasable idea!!!.
Even when the British forces (BEF) went into france, a lot of their equipment was out dated, broken or just not given to them in the first place. To give you some sort of idea of what state the British army was in, a lot of the units were given practise rounds, which have half the gunpowder of a usual 'combat' round. However what i will say is that the weakest force in France, the British, held out the longest and were prepared to fight to the last before they were given the order to evacuate.
As for the idea of bombing raids being useless, i disagree, at the time Hitlers army was so big that they would not have had to of taken any forces from 'blitzkreig' to defend their other borders, they would have sent those troops left in Germany to those lines. Yes it would hav stretched them but it would not have given Poland anymore time, we are talking about the 2nd best war machine of all time here up against a British army that was re-arming and rebuilding at the time.
people won't admit to what is.
that is part of yours and many others peoples problem, you still see it as 'is' rather than 'was'
You can point all the fingers you like at the British, however you seem to miss the fact that the army forces at that time were hardly a force.
I agree with you. But it is not about feeling of being the victims, but about facts. Facts that are sometimes ignored, or sometimes twisted around. 40 years of communist rule inside of Poland and the suppression of Polands achievements in the media, and schools surely contribute to this.
With all this typing all I am saying is that Poland got shafted and betrayed by her allies. FACT.
right and its all part of the past, what is the problem with looking forward instead of always looking back?? where is it going to get you?? NOWHERE
I didnt mean to insult you. I tend to get excited about these topics as I have a big interest in WWII and the things that happened during this time, especially in Poland, so I am a bit more "enthusiastic" I guess then the average person. Mostly people don't agree with me, but then again most of these conversation are with people from the UK, or the US.. so I understand them trying to justify their countries actions, even though we do not agree.
ok no dramas then, i understand that this topic is close to home for you, i think we can overlook a little over excitment :)
How dare you post such a thing on such a day in such a thread? You cheeky bastad, let alone the fact that you totally missed McCoy's point and came back with slur worthy of Noimigration. WTF
well everybody keeps talking about facts, how long did it take you to be invaded??? I think you'll find i can say what i like, where i like and how i like. Of course i have no problem in remembering and respecting the dead but to continually bang on about....................
Its time to look forward not backwards!!!
invaded its occupied
well actually they invaded first and then it turned into an occupation :) I think you'll find its two stages :)
now youre an expert on war too are you?
did i ever say such a thing??
How long do you think Great Britian could hold out if we were being attacked from both sides by arguably two of the greatest land fighting forces in the world and with no Channel?
so now in a forum of 'facts' you want to talk hypothetically?? lol, funny where some people will go to try and make a point.
You should probably stick to chatting with the birds of PF and leave the real chat for proper men.
why don't you stick to pumping iron you meat head :) thats probably all your good for. You see its not great to be slagged off for having a point of view, so maybe you should think about that before doing it yourself next time. Why are you reverting to silly school boy tactics if your such a man??
How dare you post such a thing on such a day in such a thread?
Well said WB.
Well i apologise for offending people, i have nothing wrong with respecting and remembering those who have fallen either in battle or on civi streets, what i have a problem with is this continual bleak, negative looking back on 'poor us' stuff.