PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / Life  % width183

Smoking ban - will this be coming to Poland like other EU countries?


OP sapphire  22 | 1241  
8 May 2008 /  #121
Are you suggesting I should stop going out? There are NO clubs in my city where smoking is banned! I'm too young to sit at home and wait till the situation changes! :/

Move to the UK.. you will be able to go to as many smoke free pubs and night clubs as you choose. Otherwise, you need to lobby your government to change the law asap. In the meantime, I'm moving to your place :)

It might be difficult to pinpoint exactly whose smoke it was that caused your health problems.. perhaps some kind of smoke detector fitted to your body. But seriously if you are really that concerned about it, then yes I think you should stop going to clubs, as they are clearly bad for you.
Jova  - | 172  
8 May 2008 /  #122
Move to the UK.. you will be able to go to as many smoke free pubs and night clubs as you choose.

You clearly don't realise what a pain it is for a non-smoker to live in a country where his/her rights are not observed.

But seriously if you are really that concerned about it, then yes I think you should stop going to clubs, as they are clearly bad for you.

That's what you call freedom of choice? I don't want such freedom!
Clubs are not bad for me. Cigarette smoke is bad for me. Smoking and clubbing shouldn't be inextricably intertwined!
OP sapphire  22 | 1241  
8 May 2008 /  #123
You clearly don't realise what a pain it is for a non-smoker to live in a country where his/her rights are not observed.

Actually I do, I was a non smoker for many years and had to tolerate cigarette smoke in public place. Now I choose to smoke but cant go clubbing or to the pub and do so, so we are both being discriminated against. I am just trying to get you to see it from both sides.. thats all.
Jova  - | 172  
8 May 2008 /  #124
I was a non smoker for many years and had to tolerate cigarette smoke in public place. Now I choose to smoke but cant go clubbing or to the pub and do so, so we are both being discriminated against.

Haha! Maybe it's time for you to think about giving up smoking again? :)
Kilkline  1 | 682  
8 May 2008 /  #125
Now I choose to smoke but cant go clubbing or to the pub and do so, so we are both being discriminated against.

Thats because your behaviour effects the health of others. If I enjoy juggling pint glasses it doesnt mean I should be allowed to do it in a crowded place.
Grounded  4 | 99  
8 May 2008 /  #126
I'd love to have seen the reaction of common Irish folk to the change. Having a cig and a Guinness was normal after work behaviour. To outlaw it was a touch controversial

Personally I think it worked well in Ireland. Being a smoker myself I must admit I enjoy going out to have a smoke as you always meet someone new to talk to. Although last time in Warsaw it was also good to just sit down and enjoy a cigarette with a pint.

The Pubculture in Ireland seems to be changing though. A lot of Pubs are now closing especially in the Town that I live in. One closed three weeks ago and four more are due to shut their doors within the next couple of weeks. Business simply isnt the same anymore. Whether or not that has something to with the smoking ban i do not know ........
walterburgess  - | 2  
8 May 2008 /  #127
yes i hope so, smoking is very bad, smelly too
OP sapphire  22 | 1241  
9 May 2008 /  #128
lot of Pubs are now closing especially in the Town that I live in. One closed three weeks ago and four more are due to shut their doors within the next couple of weeks. Business simply isnt the same anymore. Whether or not that has something to with the smoking ban i do not know ........

it definitely does have something to do with the smoking ban. It is the same in my home town.. 5 out of 10 pubs have closed since the ban came in. It is bad for the pub trade (especially for those publicans who smoke, but can no longer do so in their own homes), which is why I think there should be a choice of smoking and non-smoking establishments. You antis can go and have a smoke free time and us grave dodgers can enjoy killing ourselves and those around us.
z_darius  14 | 3960  
9 May 2008 /  #129
A few years back, Canadian govt increased taxes in cigs so that the price of 1 pack went up from $2.50 to $5.75 (avg). The amount of cigs smuggled in from the US skyrocketed and the feds started loosing money. They took the price down to under $2.50 after less than 6 months. Since then, Americans raised their smokes' tax significantly, so now a pack costs about $8.00.

According to Stats Canada, the cost of treatment of smoking related diseases costs about 30% of what the sales of cigs bring in to the federal revenue. So having a few smokers helps non-smokers too ;)
ShelleyS  14 | 2883  
9 May 2008 /  #130
I cant actually see any difference in trade in the pubs near where I live, they have all got nice seating outside now with heaters and a couple of them had flat screens fitted outside so blokes can watch the footie, drink and smoke all at the same time, who said men cant multi task.....isn't that just heaven :-)..

I think pubs are closing down because people simply cannot afford to spend the money they used to, nice city bars will always do okay but local pubs will suffer because people dont have the expendable income and why spend £3.50 on a pint when you can get a x 4 pack from tesco for the same price!
OP sapphire  22 | 1241  
9 May 2008 /  #131
why spend £3.50 on a pint when you can get a x 4 pack from tesco for the same price

now that sounds like a Polish mentality.. or at least the ones I know anyway.
hairball  20 | 313  
11 May 2008 /  #132
If you dont like it then dont go to those places

Smokers are quit ignorant and often light up in places where it's not permited. Some a$$hole decided to light up on my bus yesterday. He wasn't very happy when I kicked him off in the middle of nowhere!
Seanus  15 | 19666  
11 May 2008 /  #133
Quite right, smoking in buses is a big no-no. In Poland, u can smoke in bars but NOT buses.
lesser  4 | 1311  
11 May 2008 /  #134
According to Stats Canada, the cost of treatment of smoking related diseases costs about 30% of what the sales of cigs bring in to the federal revenue. So having a few smokers helps non-smokers too ;)

I know even better option, no public funds at all for health problems of smokers caused by their behavior with full awarenesses of the consequences.
Grounded  4 | 99  
12 May 2008 /  #135
Talking about ignorant smokers hu? While were at it lets cut funds for the treatment of drug addicts too.
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #136
The smoking ban will slowly work it's way across Europe and the civilised world.
It is no longer civilised to poison us none smokers, if you yourself choose to smoke.
Sooner rather than later is preferable to me.
BubbaWoo  33 | 3502  
12 May 2008 /  #137
so are you suggesting those countries yet to ban smoking in public places are uncivilised?
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #138
I am suggesting that smokers aren't very civilised and that they are very selfish.
The fact they wish to poison none smokers like they do themselves, proves this.
dtaylor  9 | 823  
12 May 2008 /  #139
I am suggesting that smokers aren't very civilised and that they are very selfish.

Im suggesting most drunks aren't civilised, drinking has a lot more harm on society, so to be politically correct with the rest of the eco-warriors, i suggest banning alcohol.

Oh and sending vegetarians to the gallows.
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #140
I am suggesting that smokers aren't very civilised and that they are very selfish.

Im suggesting most drunks aren't civilised, drinking has a lot more harm on society, so to be politically correct with the rest of the eco-warriors, i suggest banning alcohol.

Oh and sending vegetarians to the gallows.

I'm guessing you're a smoker :(
ShelleyS  14 | 2883  
12 May 2008 /  #141
I know even better option, no public funds at all for health problems of smokers caused by their behavior with full awarenesses of the consequences.

packet of fags in the UK are £6.00 now how much do you think of that is tax...trust me I pay for my health care twice over and practically funded the war in Iraq!

None smokers are such feking moaners!!!
z_darius  14 | 3960  
12 May 2008 /  #142
I know even better option, no public funds at all for health problems of smokers caused by their behavior with full awarenesses of the consequences.

You didn't read what I wrote.
Smokers do pay for their own health issues related to smoking by paying gobs of money in cig. taxes. Considering that those smoking related illnesses account for only 30%+ of the money smokers pour into the health system, the smokers should actually get better health coverage than non-smokers.
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #143
trust me I pay for my health care twice

Well thats great for you, py for the NHS and then expect to hog it once you're spewing your guts up on a daily basis as your lungs drown in your own bodily fluids.

My father died like this, he smoked all his life.

I hope smokers have to pay private insurance, you take the risks knowing the facts are that not only is smoking likely to kill you, it passively kills others too.

See what I mean by selfish.
lesser  4 | 1311  
12 May 2008 /  #144
Talking about ignorant smokers hu? While were at it lets cut funds for the treatment of drug addicts too.

I'm all for private health care my friend :)
BubbaWoo  33 | 3502  
12 May 2008 /  #145
I know even better option, no public funds at all for health problems of smokers caused by their behavior with full awarenesses of the consequences.

this is a very feeble arguement given the level of tax contributions smokers make throughout their (often shortened) life span.

whilst i dont often agree with dazza, in this case he is right.

a more sensible question might be to ask where the tax shortfall will be made up once tax revenue from ex-smokers decreases significantly
joepilsudski  26 | 1387  
12 May 2008 /  #146
SMOKING BAN

Smoking ban?...didn't communism end in Poland?
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #147
Smoking ban is a public health issue and while smokers continue to poison not only themselves and the environment, but other innocent people too, the public ban is the correct thing to do.

Go kill yourselves in your own homes I say, if thats what you choose, but I don't want lung cancer from you guys.
BubbaWoo  33 | 3502  
12 May 2008 /  #148
erica are you happy to have your taxes substantially increased to make up for the shortfall in revene raised from smokers once they all give up?
IronsE11  2 | 441  
12 May 2008 /  #149
I hope smokers have to pay private insurance, you take the risks knowing the facts are that not only is smoking likely to kill you, it passively kills others too.

See what I mean by selfish.

Tax generated from cigarette sales far exceeds the cost of smoking to the NHS. Banning smoking outright would put more strain on the NHS, not least because of increased life expectancy. You are f*cking stupid if you can't grasp this concept. I'd also question how doing yourself harm through smoking can be viewed as selfish.

Clubs are not bad for me. Cigarette smoke is bad for me. Smoking and clubbing shouldn't be inextricably intertwined!

That seems like a fair point...

but then you consider that I like to walk out of my house/workplace without inhaling car exhaust fumes (far more toxic than cigarette fumes and infinitely higher in volume). I don't drive but I like walking down the street. Walking down the street isn't bad for me so why is it inextricably intertwined with inhaling car fumes?

Asthma is 20% more common in cities than in the country. This has nothing to do with smoking and everything to do with pollution, yet when the tax on petrol is raised or a congestion charge introduced, people are up in arms about it.

Ironically, many of these same people are the same anti-smoking Nazis who get on their high-horse and revel in their moral superiority. The hypocracy defies belief.

Despite this, I think a smoking ban in Poland would be a good thing, as long (of course) as non-smokers are either made liable for the shortfall in tax revenue, or are banned from driving their cars. Sound like a fair deal?
erialc43  1 | 36  
12 May 2008 /  #150
erica are you happy to have your taxes substantially increased to make up for the shortfall in revene raised from smokers once they all give up?

Taxes will always be found to fund what is essential.
Smokers are a drain on society, they have more sick days, more breaks per day, cause polution and rubbish and make people ill.

Archives - 2005-2009 / Life / Smoking ban - will this be coming to Poland like other EU countries?Archived