News /
Poland's Future Includes Fewer Poles, More Foreigners [324]
It's not a refereed journal and not held to academic scrutiny. I am not disputing the information but I'm wondering if you're having a laugh at me by referring to one article from RD as some sort of definitive evidence.
According to this late breaking information I guess I should change my opinion to:
*Every single 3rd and developing world immigrant is making huge contributions to their host nation and there are absolutely no negative effects that can be associated with large numbers of immigrants in comparatively short periods of time. Any suggestion otherwise is simply unfounded and does not deserve to be investigated or discussed further. Every curry house I have ever gone to or any small shop run by foreigners which was CASH ONLY were definitely paying taxes and enriching the economy, always, without fail.*
Wow so this means that every immigrant from Bangladesh has started up a similar enterprise in their host nation right? Seriously I could start posting stories of immigrants being tried and convicted but who do you think will come up with more articles supporting extreme examples? And will that prove anything?
Exhibit a: khabarexpress.com/10/09/2008/ABVP-students-protest-in-Kolkata-against-Bangladeshi-immigrants-news_42873.html
and someone suggested? You're really either missing the point or using strawman tactics.
Dude you've no idea, I am incredibly left wing on some issues and I think immigration is a good thing in small doses. I had a very similar discussion as this a couple years ago with my best friend in the whole wide world, he lives in Canada and he is an immigrant, he is muslim, his parents are from Pakistan (he was born abroad) and is very pro-immigration. I was living in London at the time and remarked how if I were British I'd be at my bursting point already with the rate of immigration.
Well he had been to London in 2001 or 2002 and got really really offended I'd suggest anything wrong with immigration in any way whatsoever. I can understand his emotional attachment to the subject but some of the stuff he had said really crossed the line. It was then that I could see that even the most rational of people are prone to viewing some subjects in polarities only. He presented similar (polar) arguements as you have but the main problem is those are exceptions to the rule, your founder of youtube example would be like me using Richard Branson as the measuring stick for all British anglo-saxons.
Anyway, we met up in Rome a few months back and he and his wife stayed in London for a couple weeks. Guess who changed his tune? He said he couldn't believe how much the rate of immigration had not only increased but how much it had negatively impacted the city. The point he got that you have missed up till now is that too much and too fast is a problem by definition.
Here's a question for you, what do you think the effects would be in Poland if within 2 years there was a sudden and unexpected influx of Chinese labourers to fill the labour shortage problem in Poland?
Let's say to the tune of 2 million in 2 years.
Do you think that would drive wages up or down or stabalize them? How about housing and infrastructure, how would that be affected, where would they live?
Would they find good conditions or not? Would it be likely that some property owners or developers get rich on this situation? Would that cause property to be more expensive or less expensive?
Oh but hey, the Polish women's volleyball team would be really kickass and so would the national gymnastics, weighlifting and pingpong teams, *whatever negative effects there might be, those sports benefits should offset them.*
Look man, I dig your vibe, I feel the same way but you got to realize that immigration done right is akin to slow cooking, not the fast food approach.
Look at it this way as well, people group together, they seperate themselves, that's how we ended up with indigenous people and nations in the first place (even as far back as Babylon :). As much as you may want everyone to be "one" there are many more people who just aren't on that level.
I'm big on liberal policies but I can clearly see that this one of hyperimmigration is aimed at providing cheap labour to big businesses, dress it up as social dogma and no one is held accountable. Instead of sweatshops abroad, sweatshop workers are simply being imported, both are wrong.