Life /
Haunted Homes in Poland [173]
Well, if it's well documented then we should entertain the assumption that it has been proven, shouldn't we? However, well-documented doesn't mean 100% true. Did you see it with your own eyes?
No, as proof has more ambit than you are giving it, Seanny. Proof beyond reasonable doubt, 100% proof and on the balance of probabilities are very different standards of proof, wouldn't you say?
And I dislike them as much as the next person, Seanny. Too many people find profits in things that shouldn't warrant them but it's the people that pay and are suckers for those preying on their vulnerabilities. However, who's to say that it isn't reasonable curiosity on their part?
Examination of evidence is vital, I couldn't agree more. Court cases aren't decided by beliefs alone. However, even after many encounters and evidence we still class ghosts as fear of the unknown. That is to accommodate the sceptics who throw in reasonable doubt. Hearsay has limited application, it's purely circumstancial.
Proof, yeah, but to who's satisfaction?