History /
Why we talk about Nazis not Germans [138]
I find it very interesting that the same members who like generalisations about for example muslims change their preception so quick when we talk about Germans.
Yup! He was a one-man freak show.
Don't you mean a special force within the regime?
Now we go saying 'its wasnt even the entire regime... a force just...'
Some people never realise what Hitler means to some people Luk. Myself I didnt say that 'entire germany' followed him... but most of Germany certainly and most certainly did. At the end of this battle... youth volunteered... and according to their accounts (recorded even now) they volunteered willingly to realize their dream... to show themselves that they were knights of Germanica!
Plus... drawing parallels between Soviet and Nazis is naive. Soviet means to attract people and Nazi means were very different. Hitler was actually quite clear infact... while the soviet were those who showed the most promising dreams regarding economy. Actually the soviets were never (visibly) in favour of killings or racial prejudice. Its a long read.
My post was refering to some duble standarts ...
One of the aspects of humans which Hitler also used.
People like to weight different people differently...and themselves they always try to rescue. Maybe due to the German people being European... who knows... and ofcourse...themselves americans who had less than military losses in the war.
About Germans... they are obvious to explain that it was Hitler alone.
But then... where are we going with this argument...
Dont seem to go anywhere.
However, I disagree we shall call them German's instead of Nazis... this might not be helpful for the union of our future generation on path towards peace. But the history shouldnt be engineered for the sake of 'False Pride' of Europeanism, our whiteness, religion or any other reason.