It didn't take him long to bend over and take Poland off down another, less desirable path.
consequences are always good way for tracing of different interests. On the other side, in modern `game` one (some interested side) can always predict consequences and affect choice of players in the game. What i want to tell you, if you chose such a case as it was Smolensk case, you are, i am afraid, always on the filed of speculations if you try to conclude who profit from the disaster.
Well, the EU and the euro certainly affect Poland.
enemies of leading EU/NATO players seams that inevitable becoming enemies of official Poland. Just pick one from the global arena
Then, problems of leading EU/NATO powers becoming problems of Poland. Here, i point on constant fear from lack of resources and media pressure because of economic crisis. One can say- `Poland has enough resources for sustain development on the long run` and this could be truth or even more- we can agree that Poland as part of Slavic civilization has more then enough resources but, anyway, siding with EU/NATO, Poland chooses to feel every problem that threatening /for example/ Poland`s non-Slavic European partners. It is now paradox that same reasons (lack of resources and people) that pushed hostile non-Slavs in invasion on Slavic world/Poland (what initiated era of slavery/Drang Nach Osten) becoming reasons for Poland`s solidarity with so called west. It is so just because of official Poland blindly follow interests of leading EU/NATO powers and that way transfer their problems on its own population. That`s why Polish media so often speaks of global crisis.