Not that this was in any way realistic, how should those soldiers entered Poland in the first place after the war broke out?
The brits declared war on Poland as SOON as Hitler attacked. Under their treaty - they should've been flying planes, dropping off paratroopers, making logistical networks, delivering anti tank weapons, and a military loan - which the UK REJECTED. They broke their mutual defense treaty as they did NOTHING even though there was plenty to be done as the only country they'd have to avoid would be Germany as France, Sweden, Norway, etc. were neutral and they could've flown over the Baltic into Poland.
Very common in modern military history. Airlifts, flying bombers and fighters over Baltic in an arc to avoid Germany and enter Poland from the Baltic, paratroopers, special opps, secret shipments of weapons and money. You can even dump tanks out of a transport plane. It is very easy for a state actor to enter a warzone and drop off a bunch of advisors, money, and guns (especially anti-tank which would've greatly helped slow the blitzkrieg), sending weapons to a 'neutral' country with a bribe for the final destitation to be Poland, etc. But no, they did none of that. They give a 9 mil lb loan out of the nearly 500 they requested - and it wasn't a grant or free money, it was a military loan.
What they did do is give a couple stens - not millions to supply the AK but rather a few examples which they were to reverse engineer as it is a very simple weapon and mass produce it in a machine shop.
They clearly violated their treaty of using available means of defending Poland as the mutual defense treaty states. On the other hand, Poland DID hold up its bargain - it gave Britain soldiers, pilots, and even the government relocated to help assist the Brits in their campaign against the Nazis which largely involved defending UK, some campaigns in Italy, some in North Africa, etc. The Brits NEVER helped us en masse within Polish borders to help us repel the Nazis - that's a fact.
Germany is politically stable, as well as socially. And terrorism is not a problem here either, in the great scale of things
3 lies in a row - you win a prize!
dw.com/en/germany-terrorism-prosecution-cases-soar-report/a-41065442
A nearly four-fold increase in terrorism-related cases is stretching the manpower of federal prosecutors. So far this year nearly 900 terrorism cases have been opened.HAHHAHAH GERMANY HAS NO TERRORISM PROBLEMS?! That's the joke of the day rofl. The 2016 Würzburg train attack never happened, 2016 Ansbach bombing never happened, 1000 women groped in Cologne never happened, 2016 Berlin attack never happened and also no one drove a truck into a Christmas market.
Politically stable only in the sense that AfD is taking more and more seats from the lefties and cuckservatives. Merkel can't even form a coalition and 50% of Germans want her out. There's rows upon rows upon rows of tents in the middle of the towns with garbage everywhere because these slobs can't even be bothered to put the trash in a bin. That's politically stable?
Riiiiiight because all those thousand women raped in 2015/2016 on NYE and even on 2017 albeit to a smaller amount were all a figment of the imagination. The stabbings of people buying liquor during Ramadan also never occurred. The various van, truck, ak-47 assaults, explosions, etc. never occurred. All the migrants playing tarragush at the public pools surrounding girls and groping them never happen (despite all the video evidence). The constant fights, beatings, stabbings, muggings, by migrants especially to subway travellers never occurs. That's socially stable and safe, especially for women?