The racist attributes clearly belong to the racists not Polish and Ukranian people at large.
Blatant strawman argument. No-one has made such a claim.
There is nothing personal you decided that I was anti British without any evidence just a feeling that an Irish man criticising a British broadcast must be anti British.
I'm questioning why you choose to believe half-baked conspiracy theories rather than evidence
Why do you believe half-baked conspiracy theories rather than evidence?
In an argument with an other Irish poster you decided to call him a thick mick, you made an issue of his nationality which was uncalled for and are doing the same now.
Personalised irrelevancy. You can't show any evidence that the documentary was unfair, so you drag up this stupid rubbish.
I'm beginning to think that you may need a bit of help in understanding basic concepts.....The broadcast said one thing and a different thing happened, is that not evidence of lazy sensationalism?
No, it's the other way round. The broadcast claimed racism and far right activity to be a problem in the countries concerned and backed up these claims with evidence. You couldn't counter with evidence, so you brought in conspiracy theory nonsense and personal disputes.
You lose, I'm afraid.
And make the programme sensationalist - of course they have the right to do so. I just had a better opinion of the BBC, to be honest :)
How can you claim a programme you haven't actually watched was 'sensationalised'. You haven't watched it, so therefore you don't know.
What do you think - was he right or wrong to say such things?
Right.
I'm asking if they do get reported.
How? Google - that's BBC:
How? Google - that's BBC:
In that case, they do get reported, then. And how would you know about the ones that don't get reported?
my source was Lenka and goofy.
That's anecdotal evidence then.
When a Pole in the UK gets beaten up for being Polish he is a victim of the locals and when anybody anywhere does anything bad to a Polish person because that person is Polish then one who's done this may be called a thug.
He may, good Sir, be an unmitigated bounder, blaggard and cad, who need be taken to the gates of my club and horse-whipped without mercy for his ruffianly, uncouth behaviour and ungentlemanly conduct.
It requires your explanation.
Forsooth, this matter may be beyond the wit and wisdom of a humble gentleman such as my good self.