Nobody in this discussion is Polish.
greeno, I presume, went out side the UK investment protection by investing abroad. He already took on a currency risk, that sort of descision is an investment which he isn't protected against. He chose the wrong currency risk. His choice.
As I understand it, Delph the principle of European law overriding national law has actually been around since 1963.
Not quite. EU directs laws which individual countries interpret and apply according to their legal system.
Delph, there is a big difference between a qualified investor or HNWI and a 9-5er making a wage when it comes to law and financial instruments.
Going outside your home country's financial services protective bubble to make a speculative investment (in foreign currency) makes you qualified investor not a consumer. Thats a very concerted and deliberate act to bypass the FSA and its advice.
I believe if you look back and read qualified opinion there was more against than for the adoption of the Euro and this is still the case
At the time an CHF mortage was seen as a very good idea by the majority of mortgage buyers. Turns out that predicting the future is not very easy, but that doesn't mean it was a deliberate rip-off by the sellers. The buyers paid far less in interest pavements which was their motivation.
The buck always stops somewhere my friend.
The volatility of the exchange rate and the stupidity of people who bough foreign currency loans. Why should I pay for other peoples stupidity, because socialists like you want somebody else to pay for it, don't you?