What is to be said for maintaining the current weak presidential system in Poland? Why does the president have the right of legislative initiaitive but rarely uses it? Wouldn't a presidential-parliamentary system be more effective? In other words slightly more prerogatvies for the head of state and slightly fewer for the Sejm? Sejmokracja was Poland's downfall after the Great War until PiĆsuduski effected his coup to strengthen the executive power. Also ater 1989 there were 29 parties in parliament turning the assembly into a mud-slinging marathon. That is still largely the case today although the number of parties has greatly decreased-.
If it wasn't for parties wanting to pay off their backers with cushy parlaimentary seats, wouldn't it be more advisable to cut back the size of the Sejm to, let's say, 200-250 members? The extra taxpayer revenues could go to bankroll the ailing health service.
How about each of the 16 voivosdhisp having 3 senators?. That would be 48 senators instead of the current 100. (In the USA each state has 2 senators.)
If it wasn't for parties wanting to pay off their backers with cushy parlaimentary seats, wouldn't it be more advisable to cut back the size of the Sejm to, let's say, 200-250 members? The extra taxpayer revenues could go to bankroll the ailing health service.
How about each of the 16 voivosdhisp having 3 senators?. That would be 48 senators instead of the current 100. (In the USA each state has 2 senators.)