I used this opportunity to ask a question that begged to be asked.
Now how did I know you were going to do that? ;)
those question need to asked and answered by those who claim that PO government for the last eight years has been a great success and prosperity for all.
With any government you are going to get people who agree with the policies and people who don't, but generally speaking most governments are very good at looking after those at the top whilst ignoring those at the lower levels of society. Herein lies the problem. The average person is going to look at the government and ask how, if at all, their lives have improved under it.
Between 2007 and 2015 when PO were in power, minimum wage went up over 50% from 1148 PLN to 1750 PLN per month, whereas from 2002 to 2007, minimum wage stayed at more or less the same level. On the surface this looks good but of course one would have to look at how living costs have risen at the same time.
Regarding child poverty, I don't think any government fully addresses or tackles the issue, whether in Poland or not.
By the time Thatcher had finished her term in office in the UK, there were 3.3 million children living in poverty, compared with 1.7 million when she came to power. The woman was loved by the middle and upper classes, but did very little for the average working class person. It's not that much different now in the UK, child poverty has increased massively again and we now have food banks in this country. Funny how those austerity measures never really affect those at the top isn't it?
I don't know enough about PO policies from their time in power, but for the average Pole I doubt they made too much of a difference, and of course, that UNICEF report doesn't just include Poland, you have to look at the information in respect to the other countries Poland is being compared with, such as the UK for example.
to be honest to be certain it would require a study and evidence.
It would and the results from both of those reports are very broad. The 2007 report for example is quoting figures from 2000 in some cases. Although the report was published in 2007, that information had been collated over many previous years, and under different governments. In that report for example, the child deprivation rate is 21%, with 20% of children living in a low affluence family. There are no corresponding categories in the 2013 report which makes it very hard to draw a comparison.
In addition, you would also have to look at how other countries are performing. Poland slipped 6 places in the education table. This doesn't necessarily mean that education in Poland got worse, just that maybe other countries did better in the education stakes, and of course, more countries were included in the 2013 report than in the 2007 one.
I think we can safely venture a judgment that at the very least nothing has been done to improve implorable, disgraceful and appealing circumstances of nearly million children in Poland.
Variation in government policy is of course to some degree going to account for variations in child poverty levels, in Poland and in other countries. To a certain extent I agree with what you are saying, but you would also in that case have to look at previous government policies too. Child poverty is not a new problem and has not been tackled in the past, both by right and left wing governments.
As Delph was saying, there are also cultural problems too, these can't be ignored and are also part of the problem.