The constitution, the supreme law of the land, DOES NOT exempt the Tribunal from adhering to the law.
When there is conflict between law and constitution, the constitution takes priority. Why are you having such difficulty with that simple concept? If law took priority over constitution, a regime could simply change the law to say that only women can be TK judges and then accuse the TK of breaking the law when it rules to say that the new law is unconstitutional.
You will no doubt claim that such a hypothesis is absurd, but it's no more absurd than a regime refusing to appoint three new judges and then changing the law so that the vote of at least one of those three is needed for TK rulings to comply with that law, i.e. no more absurd than the reality the PIS lovers want to force on Poland.
The bottom line is that like the PO and PiS, the TK themselves have violated the constituion.
At present the constitutional court is simply not able to comply with the law it has ruled to be unconstitutional: it only has 12 members, due to the illegal refusal of that cat Duda to swear in three correctly appointed judges.
It sounds really weird when you say that about a grown man. Are you a women? Should I call you Harriet?
Oh look, yet more off-topic ad hom trolling, how surprising.