- Running a bar is a special kind of business as you open your premises for the public and therefore make the place public in this sense (maybe not in legal sense, let some lawyer here explain?).
Private property is not a public area, end of story. That is we can do things like reject people that don't meet a certain dress code. We can also play whatever kind of music we want, at what ever volume, as long as it does not infringe on anyone elses rights outside of your own property. I know about the permits and inspections that are required to open a bar. You also know that we are required to provide adequate ventilation. You do know that right? Enforce the laws on the books, don't introduce more. Why can't you just leave us alone and go to non smoking bars and restaurants? If you don't like it, just don't go there.
I think maybe it could be stated that a proprietor of a bar has to establish either smoking or non-smoking bar (and presumably pay some higher health tax!) and there actually should be special BARS FOR SMOKERS not other way round. That is a soluion: I just turned the anti-ban ramblers' argument into my own:).
That argument doesn't make sense. Does that mean that McDonalds should be paying a health tax too? You're really not getting it, just let the market work. You said it yourself, more money can be made at non smoking bars, more people will go to non smoking bars...Wouldn't it just be a matter of time before non smoking bars are the norm? Why would someone chose to have less customers and less turnover?
Why then such a law was imposed in some other countries in Europe. Do you think Sweden and many other countries made mistake or protected their citizens etc?
Because those countries are semi-socialist nanny states that think their citizens are too stupid to take care of themselves.