a.k.
5 Mar 2012 / #1
I found on this forum very worring tendention of foreign users to dismiss everything what Poles say. I understand that everyone has right to own judgements, opinions but the way how some of you are ready to argue and deny even proven facts, the lack of openmindess, the ready recipes for everything which can't be wrong by definition of being a "Western" invention, the belief that institutions of Western countries don't make mistakes, the whole patronising vein etc... make it hard to communicate, really. I know some Poles act similar way but the attitude of some of you is beyond an individual character trait of mere self-righteousness. It's more: I AM THE FOREIGNER FROM WESTERN EUROPE THEREFORE I'M RIGHT!
An exmaple here (please don't take it as a dig):
It's a reply of a user, concerning the recent rail dissaster, for my comment in which I merely pointed out that the user was wrong about accident happening on currently modernised part of the route where the trains were able only to move on one track in shuttle system. The fact is that that part of the route wasn't entered yet by one train and was already left by the other. I even provided a link with a simplified map which is explaining how it looked like. I didn't make any comment concerning who or what is at fault for the disater (but contrary what the user has assumed I personally think it's a human error, so seems media). Also the information about the kind of traffic doesn't make it less probable that that could be a human fault so his comment is completely out of place.
The user specifically quoted that part of my comment:
so it seems that this is the reason why the user don't want to believe me. It amazes me why someone doesn't want to belief in something which is closer to the source (Polish media which talk about it whole day) and consider rather something which is more like second-hand news (foreign media which barely mention the dissaster) to be the better source of the information, also additionally implying some conspiracy.*
I've already met a few times with similar approach. Do you have such experience too? What the other, the foreign side think of it?
*For those who are intrested in the further explanation regarding the disaster: I remember on Saturday evening when I was watching first reports about that, a minister of transport (or someone else who wasn't yet at the crash place, I don't quite remember) in a telephone interview said that it was on modernised one-track route. The firemen and others who were on the spot corrected the information as it wasn't that part of the route yet. That's probably where the mistake comes from.
An exmaple here (please don't take it as a dig):
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Twisting and turning to try to evade the issue that this, like most other transport disasters in Poland, is somebody's fault. Sad, when so many died.
It's a reply of a user, concerning the recent rail dissaster, for my comment in which I merely pointed out that the user was wrong about accident happening on currently modernised part of the route where the trains were able only to move on one track in shuttle system. The fact is that that part of the route wasn't entered yet by one train and was already left by the other. I even provided a link with a simplified map which is explaining how it looked like. I didn't make any comment concerning who or what is at fault for the disater (but contrary what the user has assumed I personally think it's a human error, so seems media). Also the information about the kind of traffic doesn't make it less probable that that could be a human fault so his comment is completely out of place.
The user specifically quoted that part of my comment:
Many foreign media has incorrect informations
so it seems that this is the reason why the user don't want to believe me. It amazes me why someone doesn't want to belief in something which is closer to the source (Polish media which talk about it whole day) and consider rather something which is more like second-hand news (foreign media which barely mention the dissaster) to be the better source of the information, also additionally implying some conspiracy.*
I've already met a few times with similar approach. Do you have such experience too? What the other, the foreign side think of it?
*For those who are intrested in the further explanation regarding the disaster: I remember on Saturday evening when I was watching first reports about that, a minister of transport (or someone else who wasn't yet at the crash place, I don't quite remember) in a telephone interview said that it was on modernised one-track route. The firemen and others who were on the spot corrected the information as it wasn't that part of the route yet. That's probably where the mistake comes from.