southern
27 Nov 2011
Life / Is parity the answer for Polish women? [262]
There is political representation managerial representation and income representation.Women ask for equality by political measures not by market outcome that is if a woman happens to be less competent to be compensated the same just because she is a woman.Or be hired to managerial position because she is a woman.Or gain a political seat because she is a woman despite lower competence.All the fuss is about this.Not let the natural powers prevail.
The point is that all this has a Vorrausetzung to be inn place without damaging economy.The prerequisite is that men who are excluded from their managerial position aspirations due to women blocking men will work the same way.This simply does not happen.It does not work like that.There is a fundamental flaw in all affirmative action initiatives since they disregard this basic truth.They take everything for granted and try to redistribute while the reason for distribution is the performance in first place.
Of course there are several opposing opinions to this.The central aspect in capitalist economy is that women have to be mobilised in order to make better use of human resources.It is supposed that when an ''old boys network'' is in place women are hindered from being fully mobilized to reach their potential.So we have to promote them artificially to managerial positions in order to crash the old boys network and then gain the benefits from competition.In reality even women prefer male managers.So by the time women take over bad decision making follows inevitably and really many men cannot believe the current incompetence of leadership which is obvious in many fields unlike before it is real and constantly underestimated.
Only exceptions can be scandinavian societies due to local traditions of equality physically and mentally strong women due to genetic reasons and lack of macho men again due to genetic reasons.There equality basically works because it is natural the men do not reduce their output when controlled by women.
There is political representation managerial representation and income representation.Women ask for equality by political measures not by market outcome that is if a woman happens to be less competent to be compensated the same just because she is a woman.Or be hired to managerial position because she is a woman.Or gain a political seat because she is a woman despite lower competence.All the fuss is about this.Not let the natural powers prevail.
The point is that all this has a Vorrausetzung to be inn place without damaging economy.The prerequisite is that men who are excluded from their managerial position aspirations due to women blocking men will work the same way.This simply does not happen.It does not work like that.There is a fundamental flaw in all affirmative action initiatives since they disregard this basic truth.They take everything for granted and try to redistribute while the reason for distribution is the performance in first place.
Of course there are several opposing opinions to this.The central aspect in capitalist economy is that women have to be mobilised in order to make better use of human resources.It is supposed that when an ''old boys network'' is in place women are hindered from being fully mobilized to reach their potential.So we have to promote them artificially to managerial positions in order to crash the old boys network and then gain the benefits from competition.In reality even women prefer male managers.So by the time women take over bad decision making follows inevitably and really many men cannot believe the current incompetence of leadership which is obvious in many fields unlike before it is real and constantly underestimated.
Only exceptions can be scandinavian societies due to local traditions of equality physically and mentally strong women due to genetic reasons and lack of macho men again due to genetic reasons.There equality basically works because it is natural the men do not reduce their output when controlled by women.