PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 20 Aug 2025
Threads: Total: 53 / In This Archive: 18
Posts: Total: 13668 / In This Archive: 5887
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 5905 / page 81 of 197
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
News / Poland's Nationalists hold congress [132]

they would have to go into coalition with PiS, who are damaged goods.

For somebody who is interested in politics you are displaying a little sense or knowledge.

here'll probably be the rise of yet another nutter pseudo-Catholic group.

You are nuttier if that is your understanding of politics in Poland.

I do think it's inevitable, the only question is whether Kaczynski would rather destroy the party than go quietly.

Why would he go quietly when it was his work and meeting with people around the country that improved PiS standing. Evidently in person he is nothing media say he is.
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

First of all

OK you have no argument - get lost!
I'm not interested in reading your boring ramblings about you and your ego.
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
UK, Ireland / Scots better than Poles? [41]

How the Scots Invented the Modern World by Arthur Herman

Hey people! WE know who is to blame now!!!
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
News / Poland's Nationalists hold congress [132]

SLD boss Miller said on TV that he represented 'progressive Poland' and the nationalists -- backward (zaƛciankowa) Poland.

Ask comrade Miller about his ugly influence in sabotaging health services in Poland.
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
UK, Ireland / Scots better than Poles? [41]

A few years back a Scots journalist remarked that tiny Scotland had contributed more to world civilization than a big country such as Poland.

What? When Poland was contributing to European history Scots were reaming free with their butts naked.Tell him that Polonous.
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

but I suggest some English lessons. The point is clear.

The point is far from clear. you are rambling on without making sense.

It's not an either / or situation. They should pay taxes on both, just like companies have to pay taxes both on their income and on their employees.

I think you don't understand.

- provide proof that your taxes are spend on Church.

you explained nothing, probably you don't understand how the Church is taxed.

Can you provide some proof for that?

you mean documents? you first!

That's not marriage, just a civil union. And even that, civil unions are not allowed in Poland, with RCC being one of the main opponents.

only because gays do not want civil partnership not really - that just tactics.They want be called marriage and force that fiction onto people.

That's your point of view.

Reality.

Why? Maybe she prefers an abortion? Or the contraceptive didn't work?

I'm not telling her anything. The moral law is telling her that. If I were to speak I would say - no to murder. You have no right to take somebody's life. As for right to your body you should have go for snap if you don't want children, if you are so stupid that you are ******* your;sef blind you have no right to decide about another human being life.

Freedom without responsibility is anarchy. Freedom do not mean that you can do what you want.

Of course it's about what a single person wants.

none is a lone island
move to an uninhabited inland and there you can do what you want.

The law should provide them with options, not restrictions.

You have options yet you do not see them.

So you're implying the civilization did fall?

not yet but is on the edge of a cliff.

So far, in this thread, you called me immature and a ******** talker

stop whining you called me names too.

You willfully omit the part,

Read this again - All laws are morally related. You don't want to abolish them all you want to be able to decide what is moral and what is not.

Once you start on that path - where does it end?


f it doesn't infringe personal freedoms of other people. Y

It means nothing, personal freedoms if not backed up by the moral law can be changed at will.

You're a manipulator. No one says homicide or rape are fine.

Not yet that is.

No one is forcing to get acquainted with a gay couple.

I have nothing against gays or gay couples in general.

You don't need to pretend anything. It's their life they choose and it's absolutely none of your business.

as long as they are a part of the society - it is my business.

If they want to get married, they should be able to.

The point is they cannot get married. They can say and claim all they want. Marriage is possible between a man and a woman.
I can pretend to believe them for social and humane reasons but once they want to change the law to suit their fantasy - no way Jose. That would erode moral base of a society. If this can be changed everything else can.

Also, I assume you prefer kids to be left in a foster home than be adopted out by a gay couple? That just shows how much you care about the fate of the less fortunate.

you are being sloppy. There is no connection there.
Ironside   
9 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

If you meet a woman and she's not a virgin, but she's really great and she truly loves you, and you love her, that is not enough?

you are not listening.

at pattern is for upper middle class then? Graduate a university, get a dole, live off mum and pop? ;)

find appropriate husband/wife, man - take a place on a board of shareholders,woman - join foundation to run by her auntie to help less fortunate.

Does that mean something is wrong with me IRON????

You are 19 nothing wrong with you.

I haven't sensed the slightest empathy from you so far.

Because you are confused.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

I must admit I greatly enjoy the conversation.

You must have missed that bit when he said that he picked on my allegedly flawed logic because eh couldn't have been bothered to read your comprehensible ramblings.

like here for example you are not making any point here just rambling on.Is that even means anything?

Your logic is flawed. If you attack Hitler for what he's done, is it only right to point out the positive things he's done for his country?

Your is not flawed and so simple is nonexistent,I think that your only aim to type this sentence was to write Hitler and compare him with the Church.. A very mature move.

Well, unfortunately, that's not how the tax law works. Companies, organizations and citizens are obliged to submit their declarations every year. Church doesn't declare anything.

the Church pay tax from all adults leaving in the parish. They can be atheist, Jews, Muslims or Protestants but the Church is paying tax for them. That is the way it works, So, if they would pay only for the income such as weddings and funerals they would be better off. So stop talking bull.

True, but polish churches are built with a huge pomp, and a lot of money is being spent on them.

Nonsense that is your slanted view? Secondly It is not of your business, should I tell you how to send your money?

Everyone should be treated equally by the law

Are you using your time and resources to help disabled children or visit sick people. Do you pay for some orphans that they could go for holidays. Do you provide using your private income and your time some valuable service to community? If so then and only then you can demand equal treatment with priests.

Anyway I have already explained how the Church is taxed. The point is either you cannot read with comprehension or you don't want to understand cause it would bust your delusions to dust.

I'll explain. Officially, the possessions belong to the diocese. The diocese is being funded, in part, by our government from our tax money. Hence, we buy them these possessions.

For 63 years the state haven't been transferring income form confiscated The RCC estates breaking the law.
Still 31% of the Church assets are still in the state possession. Income from those assets equals about 162millions 526 000 zloty, whereas Chruch is receiving about 92 million zloty. So who is a thief then?

No, but if I want to marry another guy, I can't (can't do taxes together, can't inherit, nothing)

Civil partnership says you can.Congratulation.

The highest value of the western world is freedom.

The highest value of the wester word are money and power that came with the money. That all means that freedom is not for all. The western societies are starting realizing that.

If my wife wants to have an abortion, she can't.

Should have use anti-conception if she is not a Christan or use her mouth.

If we want to

well you cannot have everything deal with this. If you are so unhappy you can always move to greener pasturer.
The world is not revolving around your wants. What you call freedom is not freedom that barbarous anarchy. You have no idea what freedom is.

The civilization did not fall. It thrived. And it will keep on thriving, whether conservative bigots want it or not.

Soviets and Communism, Fascism proved that when civilization turned its back to the roots ie Christianity thing are going form bad to worse. So I wouldn't be calling preset civilization thriving when there is no call for people to die form hunger anywhere. When few wallow in riches and the masses are striving to survive hardships.

Yes, call people with different opinion bigots what makes you better? your arrogance and hate? Commies have given an example where such attitude leads.

That's why, as I stated before, all moral-related laws should be abolished.

Including laws that prevent somebody to kill you in the middle of the street without consequences? Or that one that says that rape is not kosher?

All laws are morally related. You don't want to abolish them all you want to be able to decide what is moral and what is not.

Once you start on that path - where does it end?


. No one will be forcing you to marry another man if gay marriage is ever signed into law.

But they are forcing me to pretend that they are married. Which I call infringement on my rights. As long as they have civil partnership they can p to be married all they like. I don;t mind but f on majority that fiction and forcing them to pretend that such union is a real marriage is bad. Not to mention that the next step in this charade will involve kids and that sometimes ends baldly for a kid as an American example showed.

If there is corruption within an organization

You are talking a lot about corruption but you haven't provided anything to support your claims. I don't even know what you are talking about.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

I was born one, and so were you. We have equal footing here ;-)

According to you, one shouldn't talk about virginity not being a virgin or about women not being a women and so on......that is logic i disagree with but still...

Can you enlighten us? Because all the reasons that come to my mind are rather small-minded and unpleasant.

Very simple and basic human need to take a special place in a woman heart.

You don't need to be that someone as long as you understand that you will never truly know what they know and feel.

You make it sound as some king of impossible task. In fact what you need to understand women psyche is some life experience, some interaction with women in their different life roles and intelligence and some empathy. No that impossible to come by.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

When you ask anybody about the sex addiction most people would say they associate this condition more with men than women. Even the link you gave has an alternative name listed: "donjuanism". That would mean your claim about men being less prone to harmful effects of promiscuity is completely false.

Not necessarily, men can be affected after having many more casual partners than woman, that would still mean that I'm right.

Secondly, since marriage of teens is passe in XXI century - to put it mildly, how do you think a woman should fulfil her needs? Or maybe she should keep her "wianek" until her late 20s?

Once again I do not debate virginity here but since we are on it I don't think that is right that 14 years old or 15 years old do start their sex life. So you are pushing your argument here talking about late 20'. Anyway the best age for women to marry is between 20 and 26.

The problem is promiscuity for both sexes and specially young women starting their sex life very young.
Also I casual; attitude to sex and seeing sex as a commodity in the modern society encourage all kinds of harmful behavior and self-destructive patterns in peoples life.

However the current lifestyle expects us to finish our education, get a job, proper savings

That is pattern for a lower middle class.

be emotionally mature when we go down the aisle

What emotionally mature?Those are very vague expectations. If a woman 20 - 26 is not mature enough to start family and a man 26- 32 is not mature enough there is something wrong with them.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

Are you a woman to know all about that?

What kind of question is that?
So you have to be something to talk about it?

I'm not, but the subject at the time WAS virginity.

Are you virgin then?

There is a vast difference between being a normal, red-blooded female, and being a promiscuous slut. I don't think you are capable of seeing that difference.

I see that you can read my mind too.

It's quite easy to ask questions if in doubt

What doubt? I misunderstand you due to your unclear statement. Get it over.

Second, those who favour physical virginity - an intact hymen - seem to want women to bleed on their wedding nights. That sounds like it could be a painful and somewhat scary experience for an inexperienced young woman. What kind of a man would want his wife's first experience of married life to be like that?

Well you are making this up as you go. I'm sure you are kidding right?Cause you believe in a magic number three.
I can thing about one reason a man want to take special place in a woman life and be her first.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

It looks more like a symptom of a mental problem, not a cause of it.

In this way we can argue about everything. The point there is a mental problem connected with promiscuity and it not the only one.

And why would loss of virginity affect women so much?

Why you are obsessed with virginity. I'm talking about promiscuity.

And pray why not?

I don't know. Probably it has something to do with differences between sexes.

Again, why exactly? Women use men sexually too, you know.

Why? Read up! I know but it may work for some women. For majority it doesn't work that well, does it?

Do you think men are too dense to realise that they are basically somebody's throwaway toy? A dildo on legs, to put it bluntly?

Somebody has been burnt, sorry.

Or do you really live in a world were women have no sexuality to speak of and their only role is to lie back and think of England?

Well the life is not TV program. There is not clear cut, I think that being proud of promiscuity and trying to emulate some men is harmful for women in general -thats all.

To my question whether you think promiscuous men never or rarely become seedy sleazebags (which to me is also a description of their mental makeup), you answered that men are not affected mentally. Your answer shows you did not even try to understand my question.

No I didn't. You are another one that blames others for your shortcomings. You didn't make yourself clear and I do not posses ability to read your mind.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
News / PO-PiS again neck and neck [248]

If it's factual, do you have anything to support your statement?

Just reality - how many businesses belong to Polish owners only?To clarify I don't mean self-employed or kiosk leasing.
Ironside   
8 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

Mentally? Are you a psychologist?
Regardless gender, the only thing which is disgusting in being promiscuous are STDs

Really? Do you think that psychological effect are to be neglected?

Which seemed to hint that men are "better"(?) than women in the sense that they do not need to keep their virginity, but I was not sure, so I asked.

I was implying that it do not affect men that much one way or the other.

never said that; you, on the other hand, seem to claim that having over a hundred different partners would NOT affect a man mentally

I would say that it would affect a man to a lesser degree than it would affect a woman.

No, I was simply stumped by your frankly unintelligent answer.

Unintelligent?
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

Great answer. :-/

better than being a stud who is ******* everything that moves and do not run fast enough.

don't even know what to answer to that.

Never though about that?

You must be living on a different planet.

Why? Are claiming that having over hundred different partners do not affect a woman mentally?
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
Love / Fresh, wholesome country lass in Poland - getting married and going back to the US [167]

So this is as Harry said simple fear of competition? Pathetic.

What competition? There is no competition between men and women and if there is its sick.

have a question to Ironside and Polonius3: is a virgin who watches adult movies or/and masturbates chaste?

I have no idea. Check definition of the word chaste.

Better than what?

Better than that.

Like they catch fewer STIs and never become seedy sleazebags, right?

Well I meant affected mentally.

The 1950's american businessmen with mistresses sowed the seeds & gave way to the loose sexuality of the 60s. Great traditions.

I would rather think that 60's was deliberate attempt at destroying society by introducing so called sexual revolution.
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

The people who currently comprise the ranks of the RCC in Poland cannot legitimately take credit for the accomplishments and sacrifices of others in the past.

Why not?

The people who currently comprise the ranks of the RCC in Poland must take responsibility for any corruption which infects the organization in the present.

I don't know about infestation but few people less then perfect you can find anywhere.

If these goofs want to talk about spreading the word of God and claim moral superiority

Who is claiming moral superiority? Not clergy.\, they do not. You have this thingee wrong.

I am not talking about commercial activity, I'm talking about taking in more money than is being spent or "invested."

I really do not understand what you are talking about or what is your point here.

You can't claim to represent God and be even a little bit corrupt -it's got to be nil (imho).

Really? Says who? Anyway we are talking here about few individuals who are less than perfect but your generalization as a generalization is untrue.

All that being said, it's dishonest to claim there is neither major hypocrisy regarding money and power nor any corruption in this organization in Poland.

Major dishonesty is only your perception. I do not see any major dishonesty or hypocrisy in the RCC in Poland. Nobody claims there is not corruption but as I said few people are just few people.
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

No, it's correct. When the church ceases to make a profit here, it'll either close up shop or reposition itself on the market. Nothing personal but that's a fact Jack.

if there is commercial activity the Church in Poland pays due taxes. Those who says differently are know jack all or are talking rubbish.
It is full page about the law concerning the Church and all activities form commercial to charity and all about tax:
isidorus.net/show/prawo,7,Opodatkowanie_kosciolow_oraz_osob_duchownych&jezyk=PL

That is an illogical response to an illogical "attack." So the statement "The church in Poland earned its position many times over..

Well I can agree that it my seem to be an illogical statement but we are talking about realm of abstraction and immaterial concepts. As such given a large doze of generalization doesn't has to be logical in the materialistic sense of the word.

It is logical if you preclude it with few preconditions and assumptions not stated here.

Really, it's all a bit silly, the RCC in Poland is corrupt and Poles don't seem to care or want to pretend otherwise.

Well I would point out that your statement constructed in this way is illogical. If the Church cannot claim to accomplishments which they did nothing to affect in the same why they cannot be blamed as a whole for what few individual may do. That is according to you.

If the Church is indeed corrupted then it is still the least corrupted institution in Poland.
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

We also did accept the EU law in public voting.

I didn't.

And you completely are missing the point, which was that the concordat was signed single-handedly - in a very undemocratic manner.

Nonsense not more undemocratic that all decisions made in the Parliament by the majority in power.

t means religion-free. Separate from religion.

So which one is that?A state religion free is not the same as a state where a state is separated from religion not

Not affiliated with any religion or any church

.
Do you understand yourself what you want to say?

Its position should be in religious people's hearts, away from all the politics.

That is meaningless bullshyte, why don't you keep your atheism in your heart away from all politics? That makes no sense, the RCC is not only clergy which have the same right as others citizen but also RC people who are just citizens and have the right to have the law consistent with their moral code.

How is that imposing religion on others or mixing into politics?

I'm showing you a hypothetic situation, in which a majority, in a democratic way, surpresses the minorities' freedoms.

So be it. Alas your hypothetical situation have no sway in a Christian country where invention of tolerance had been made.

I'm sorry, but it seems you're the one seriously derailed if you want to control what other people can or can't do, even if it doesn't infringe your personal freedoms.

If they want to call a cow a horse that their problem but if they try to change definition to ensure that all people would be forced to do the same - then yes I call it dangerously derailed. Yes it does infringe my freedom if somebody want me to pretend that a cow is a horse.
Ironside   
7 Jun 2013
History / Poland is a Catholic country [177]

The RCC in Poland seems to operate on a for-profit basis in practice, until I see otherwise, that's how I'm gonna see it.*

What do you mean - seems - your seems is wrong. That all I have to say.

It's not a single sentient body.

No is not but if the Church is attacked as whole then there is only right to point out positive and heroic deeds and its positive role on a whole in the Polish history.

No, it's your fault you snip and cut my quotations according to your liking and reply to them in part, making my statements contextually completely different. It's called manipulation.

I did not snip, cut or change your expressions in any way. I have been quoting your sentences as you write them. You are the type who blame others for his own shortcomings. Stop it and accept responsibility for your own words.

Main bulk? Show me some proof, statistics, how much money goes from church to the charity and what percentage is that. Then we can talk

Show me some proof or statistic that your claim is valid. I are only talking. That is your opinion based on thin air and dare to demand proof? My words are based on the knowledge of multiple charitable organizations and action run by the Church in Poland and abroad.

It stands to reason that all cost money so there is not that much left.

Also, have you been to any polish church recently? Hardly any gold? Right.

If something is glided or is shiny doesn't mean that it gold. Not all what shine is a gold.

And how did the "owners" get the money? Income. Taxed? No.

Bishops? I don't know how that works for Bishops but for priests they buy it from their what they earn. The first car is often funded by their family. Income is definitely taxed. The fact that you seems have your idea of the way priest should be taxed do not change a thing.

You claim to support a unobtrusive state who tax people a little. So I must conclude that your vicious attack on priest income and willingness to tax them to the hilt deriver from jealousy or a grudge. Not nice feelings, not generous but that we both know that you are not a nice person.

The only problem that I have is that these services should be taxed just like any other services performed by other parties. You willingly omitted my example about the party and the DJ, which was spot-on and you know it.

Well yes it is spot on. I wasn't clear enough and mixed things. I mean to say that there are no fixed price for those services but such services are not forced on anyone, you choose them willingly. So if you are not using them why complain about them and if somebody choose to use them and then complains he/she is a dick.

Here I don't have to explain that to you, do I?:
isidorus.net/show/prawo,7,Opodatkowanie_kosciolow_oraz_osob_duchownych&jezyk=PL

My vision is false? Okay, then who elects these idiots to the parliament? Aliens?

other idiots who have no clue about citizen duties to care for the common good and most of them care only for their own sorry asses. As long as their are fools those sum will rule in Poland.

You still failed to disclose how much does the state still owe to the parasite that our church is.

How about some statistic, proof anything that support your claim, so far you are talking out your ass. I could have been claiming that you are a parasite scamming people and Polish state with the same degree of poof you presented here.

'm being awkward? So, you're telling me the tax money I pay don't go to church or its ministries? Welcome to the alternative reality

no I'm telling you that government unwillingness of returning the Church property is the main culprit of the fact they prefer using taxes to pay them off. Why do you choose to blame the Church is beyond me. Do you understand those circumstances or not?

That is not up for you to decide. I, as an atheist, am a minority in Poland. I'm definitely not best protected by "moral" and "ethical" "teachings" of the Church.

I don't see why. Do they force you to go to the Church or sing the Lords prise or you will not be given a passport? That nonsense, you know very well they you can do as much as you please and there are not religious encroachment on your rights.

Right. Originally protestant or anglican democracies are so negligible that they are not even worth mentioning.

Are Protestant not Christan?

Take a look at the non-religious, and thus uncivilized and savage countries, such as: Estonia, Sweden, Denmark, Czech Republic, Norway, Japan or United Kingdom. How come they are doing pretty well without any religious superstitions?

Those countries started as Christan countries and that is my point. Christianity as a cradle of modern democracy.

War on civilization? Interracial relationships used to be just that. Working women used to be just that

Never heard about the RCC denying right to marry to interracial couples or against women employment on the moral ground. Progressivism is a false path.

So yes war on civilization.No way!

But no one is preventing you from following your moral code as a Christian. You don't need to have it signed into law to follow it

How is that different for you? None is preventing you form following your atheist creed. You don't need the law to be atheist to follow it.

If it's Christian values, then following your logic, most of the western, civilized Europe is not democratic. That is obviously false.

Obviously not.

If you keep on imposing your christian morals on others who don't want to accept them, you are the dangerous idiot here.

Why imposing? They are trying imposing their values on majority. According to you they do not need changes in the law to follow their creed.

They are dangerous idiots because they do not recognize that only moral code based on religion is the best deterrent against states turning totalitarian.