Life /
Why are Muslims seen as a deterrent to Poland? [565]
@TheOther
Ok lets dissect the b/s arguments you just advanced.
1. I don't keep up on Virginia politics. However, Chris Christie can hardly be considered a real conservative, he has some hints of being Republican, but if you know NJ politics, a real conservative will never be elected in New Jersey. Nothing changed in NJ under Christie, property taxes remain some of the highest in the nation, and NJ continues to imprison their own citizens for forgetting to empty 1 round from a magazine with a 3 year minimum mandatory. Chris Christie signed medical marijuana into law for christs sake! But he's a conservative? (I think all drugs should be decriminalized for the record, I'm a Ron Paul Republican).
2. Um, actually, I emphatically said throughout all of my previous posts that multiculturalism is NOT about race or religion, as the frigging NAME implies! Please dispense with the logical fallacies, America's multicultural efforts were ORGANIC, and they formed what is today a uniquely American culture (worthy of respect I might add, I don't find it socially acceptable to denigrate American culture, while proclaiming I need to celebrate the greatness of the religion of peace).
I think we've made it clear we are against the project of FORCED multiculturalism (the opposite of organic). While America did have mass migration in the past, it worked out because the cultures who came here were either culturally similar or compatible, or they were for instance, Asian immigrant groups who yearned for cultural assimilation. That stands in stark contrast to North African and Middle Eastern migrants that not only are opposed to integration and assimilation, but then DEMAND the host nation adapt to THEM! (Holiday tree instead of Christmas tree, if you come to America knowing we celebrate Christmas, you can **** off if you think we're going to change our language to accommodate your delicate sensibilities.) The aforementioned migrant groups were culturally compatible, the present migrant groups have proven through their deeds and their words, that they are culturally incompatible with our western civilization and western LIBERAL values. I care about LGBQT rights, and I care about womens rights, and I want them to achieve EQUITY, and these migrant groups think that death is the acceptable punishment for being homosexual, and that womens testimony in court is worth 1/2 of a mans. For this reason alone, the LGBQT community in Germany is flocking to the far-right AfD in droves! That is the lefts fault, and no one elses. They are not IslamoPHOBES, because that word means the 'irrational fear' of something, and their fears are NOT irrational, and for you to diminish their voice and opinion because you want to white-knight for 7th century barbarians is utterly offensive and affront to the liberal values you people espouse.
We say nothing of Japan, Korea, Samoa, India, Saudi, or DR Congo to have cultural homogeneity, but we think it is ok to demand that the cultural fabric of America and Europe be changed to accommodate unskilled military-aged male migrants. This is rank hypocrisy, its offensive, and you can keep burying your head in the sand of the impending political crisis that will be further exacerbated but unabated migration, or you can decide to LISTEN to the constituencies and STOP talking down to them and telling them they're bigots for wanting to have a homeland with their own culture. You have at least SOME argument to insist that America take large migrant groups because of our history, and you can at least claim some measure of guilt against Britain, France, and Spain who had empires; but you have absolutely no leg to stand on to insist that Eastern European countries who didn't participate in colonialism take these people. France is the ancestral homeland for FRENCH people, a people of relative homogeneity, and what I see from the arguments put forth thus far, is that we have no problem for India to keep their ancestral homeland relatively homogenized, but Europeans don't have that right (and since leftists are so fixated on the social construct of race, one might venture to say that the white devil can't have an ancestral homeland, but others can).
We have to hear terms from you people like "White fragility," as you dismiss the idea that white people can ever be persecuted, and advance false narratives not based in reality (and in Webster's, no less) that white people can't experience racism because they are the power structure, which is literally NOT the textbook definition of racism in Webster's, as it makes NO mention of power structures. That you continue to advance these false narratives, and DISMISS the concerns of 'white' people, you will continue to push them into the arms of the right, because when they say they feel they are under attack, its probably because.................THEY ARE UNDER ATTACK. That is not hysteria, that is pretty much born out in the evidence if we analyze the things said by left wing politicians, news organizations, and editorial and opinion pieces. White privilege, white guilt, white fragility. Yes, you will most certainly gain allies when you tell people that their accomplishments really are not the product of hard work, they only gained their success because of the color of their skin.
