Life /
Foreigners in Poland - the identities of our native or the host country [66]
When countries have equal opportunity laws they create hindrances and distortions which don't always lead to the best candidates being hired or plans being implemented.
Anti-discrimination laws, in themselves, don't create this problem.
The law is redundant (IMO) where there is a basic concept of all citizens being equal but does fulfill a purpose in spelling out punishments for violation of equality. The problem arises in situations where "de facto" discrimination is determined to exist based upon a purely statistical analysis of the company's employee group by race, nationality, gender, age, etc. That is what you bring up mid-way through your comment and it is a shame that this method of judging compliance is used.
Rather than consider the individual selection, the government determines you are discriminating against a group by pointing out that your employees don't meet the statistical profile of the society at large. As a hiring manager and as a Human Resource Specialist I have been forced to make decisions as to the best FEMALE electrician rather than the best ELECTRICIAN. I have searched for a COMPETENT Mechanic and delayed hiring the BEST MECHANIC available. When hiring 200 for summer work requirements, I have had to divide the applicants into two groups (M and F) then hire as many COMPETENT females as possible while rejecting BETTER-QUALIFIED males in a numbers game. Sadly, I was congratulated for managing to hire a FEMALE, HISPANIC electrician despite the fct that I had better qualified electricians, male, who needed work and appeared likely to perform better than the woman hired.
However, all that said, there ARE times when the quotas and forced hiring become necessary to break patterns of prejudice and discrimination with regard to all sorts of demographic factors. They should be a last resort though, not the quickest way achieve integration and assimilation of diversity in the workplace. The facts are that Blacks, Hispanics, Women, Gays, Older Workers, Asians, Jews, Muslims, Arabs, etc. were and still are discriminated against despite their being better qualified. To me, these always made more sense to consider individually but the reality seemed to be that our government suddenly realized it would take a massive agency to deal with judging qualifications on a case-by-case basis.
Then there is the argument concerning the right of the employer to hire who they wish, qualified or not. It's their money, their investment, their risk. I support them as well but proving that they discriminate AGAINST one type of person is often difficult. Somehow though, Hooters still hires female waitresses with attractive bodies, car dealerships hire mostly male sales staff and the Marines are saying some women are simply not going to cut it in certain combat roles.