PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by Mr Grunwald  

Joined: 16 Dec 2008 / Male ♂
Last Post: 18 Nov 2024
Threads: Total: 33 / In This Archive: 10
Posts: Total: 2133 / In This Archive: 804
From: Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yes (Tak)
Interests: history - politics - food - heraldry - pro publico bono

Displayed posts: 814 / page 4 of 28
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Mr Grunwald   
18 Oct 2011
History / Do Poles really blame Britain for Poland becoming Communist after the war? [104]

But the greatest blame is British and French for not holding their part in agreement to attack Germany in September 1939

Their greatest blame was deceiving Poland. France had no capacity to attack Germany and win, if they did they would had done it. Having low morale and plenty of ww1 kind of airplanes does no good vs morale boosted with a bit of experienced German troops...
Mr Grunwald   
18 Oct 2011
History / Do Poles really blame Britain for Poland becoming Communist after the war? [104]

and the Soviets wouldn't be able to refuse them.

They actually did play it (later) and Stalin was "Oh? How nice :)" They got buffled since they didn't know Stalin was a great poker player and had/building his own bomb

They could have pushed the "Isn't a little weird you Soviets want the same/almost the same area Poland had before you took it in 1939? Punishing Poland for what? Fighting the Nazi's when you stabbed her?"
Mr Grunwald   
18 Oct 2011
History / Do Poles really blame Britain for Poland becoming Communist after the war? [104]

I really am just curious as to what course of action people think Britain could have taken to save Poland from being Communist.

Well
1. Great Britain bluffed using Poland yet Poland couldn't bluff and use Great Britain like they would have wanted to
2. Used Polish troops more proportionally then Poland used British troops (mathematics how cynical I know)
3. Having same/tiny more help from "enemies" then from Great Britain
4. No sense of gratitude towards Poland
5. Declaring war on Nazi Germany but, not on the Soviet Union (both attacked Poland)
6. Minimizing their war effort to naval/air warfare in Europe in the early stages
7. Finding out from the Soviets that their going to lose half their territory and gain new lands in eastern parts of Germany and not from Great Britain/U.S.A at the same time hearing they agreed to it, and then told not to speak about it to their own populace

8. Having Poland's leader assassinated (suspicions only so far)
9. Trying to expel Polish soldiers that served in the British armed forces after the war ended or get rid of them.
10. Commie propaganda painting UK very badly.

Do you want me to go on?
There are tons of reasons, more about feelings and how Great Britain behaved then what it actually helped with.
Mr Grunwald   
18 Oct 2011
News / Poland Elections oct 2011/your feed back about RP Janusz Palikot? Poland is changing! [106]

I find it despicable that a Pole allows another Pole the freedom to fire off in all manner of ways yet he takes issue with a foreigner that has another perspective and can thus point out some things which appear wrong in his eyes.

It's the partitions-complex
Every alien is sure to lie about Poland because he/she has no gain from approving/complementing it
When a Pole criticize it, it's because they do it to inform other Poles of what kind of Poland their imagining.

It's a very natural reaction when you see it from an more objective point of view: He saw the Pole as talking about paintings, while see you as having an sword in your hand (not attacking fully with it yet) but still holding a sword and talking negative about somethign that has to do with Poland.

Word of advice either go the German way polonizing yourself or lower the sword/throw it away
Mr Grunwald   
17 Oct 2011
News / The cross in Polish parliament - Does it bother you? [100]

But elementary justice requires that it is accompanied by other religious symbols, equally good.

an brilliant tribute to our heritage

The cross is symbolic here so it's in the right place.

fully agree

no, the presence of the other symbols is as senseless

If one would know history it would been senseless NOT TO have their presence

Do you know how religiously tolerant Poland was in 16/17 century?

apparently we were hunting witches an mass (the Saxon king influenced an witch hunting), murdering people of different sexual orientation (Hmm can't remember where I learned that... maybe... never?), killing Jews (jedwabne for instance there was a vote and majority of Poles came together and elected an government which had most important campaign: kill all Jews! Oh hang on... Sorry! Misinterpretation! It was some Polish villagers who had learned about a rumor that some Jews had killed a child... So sorry) , imprisoned ethnic minorities for just being that certain ethnic group (Poland made this little organization called: Tajna służba polityczno policyjna do spraw mniejszościowych! Oh wait.. wrong again so sorry :)), burning capitals (Poland is famous for burning down various towns and capitols killing off their entire population like the Romans did with Carthage! If I only came up with a name...)

You see pawian, one can't be unique, or different. Cause in medieval times all Europeans did crusades... had knights... had big castles... lords who were subjugating their subjects and etc.
Mr Grunwald   
17 Oct 2011
News / Palikot or the Poles getting rid of the Polish society old Taboos in 2011? [30]

In other words Poland is becoming as tolerant as Spain or the UK.

reading that statement is the same as if I saw: a tiger (Spain) and a wolf (UK) eating meat while the gorilla (Poland) eats fruits, then suddenly after having been eating meat all their life. Turn vegetarian and criticize everyone for eating meat, especially the gorilla that tries out a beef he just found.

but given its History it is a new Revolution for Poland.

That just made me laugh LOL

Freedom in sexual orientation(gay friendly) and transgender

Why so selective? What about necrophiliacs? pedophiles? Or even zoophiles?
Mr Grunwald   
18 Sep 2011
News / What you think about parliament monarchy in Poland? Imperial Poland? [13]

So, what you people think?

Do you mean constitutional monarchy?
If so then I would think most Poles would say: no
(this is from a Norwegian-Polish royalist :))

Monarchies are soo medieval

Democracy is so ancient...

Poles are used to the current system.

Even when there was monarchy in Poland the king acted more like an innefficiant president then a real king -.-
Monarchy in Poland is impossible, it just wouldn't be a monarchy even if the person called himself King.
Mr Grunwald   
6 Sep 2011
History / What do Poles owe to Russians? [193]

That wonderful construction was built by Russians as a gift to Poland.

You can put your pałac kultury in your arse!
Stalin gave the Polish commies the plans and then they had to make Poles build it. What a gift!
On the ruins of Warsaw he didn't want to save... Ironic?

I can have an conversation with an Russian no problemo, but if the Russian state would crumble I wouldn't shed a tear
Mr Grunwald   
8 Aug 2011
News / Polish flag was changed by taking the coat of arms? [48]

Yes, it's just you. If you'll have to pick a Scandinavian flag obviously the Swedish is the prettiest,

bu** sh** it's too easy. if it had some more majestical colours like little stripes and an symbol then maaaaaybe. But of all scandinavian flags, Norwegian is the pretty one
Mr Grunwald   
16 Jul 2011
UK, Ireland / Poles in the UK not a problem as far as i can tell [79]

I'd like to come back to this one actually after ive been giving it some more thought. There has been three main adjustments for us.

Well as long as on the right fence that suits you, then no grass can ever be greener ;)
Mr Grunwald   
21 Jun 2011
News / Lithuanian ambassador 'Poles not loyal citizens' [63]

am i sensing German influence on Lithuanians? Germany is NATO`s and EU`s watchful eye over Poland

since the mid-18th hundreds Lithuanians have been vastly influenced by Germans/Germany and abandoned the Polish cause. (the elite)

country doesn't mean nationstate Nathan. One can be ethnically something else and not even speak the language of the state to be pro- that state. Austria comes to mind.

Nathan are you advocating that for instance your kids if they moved to... Norway for instance, learned Norwegian and forgot about their Ukrainian roots? How would you feel about not being able to talk to them unless you know Norwegian or you both English? How do you think your family would think of it? In what language would they pray? What you want is nothing else then assimilation!

Your using the same tongue Polish landlords/politicians in the past or Prussians used! Shame on you! Nathan! shame on you...
Mr Grunwald   
18 May 2011
News / Visegrad Battle Group under the command of Poland [261]

And that is exactly what moved our valiant vassals: Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary to ask for our protection

Let's not overheat here shall we?

I can hint that with Germany (perhaps) joining in, it would make Germany having a lot more influence then being in the EU sharing power with France, U.K. Having her "own" alliance led by Poland which she could back up. That would only provide benefits, IF Germany will act like that. It may even have a chance of redeeming herself while people whisper about the times they heard stories of how unpleasent or malace like it was in Western Europe.

The Russian federation would certainly back this (since it could break up NATO, or most of it) and having an helpfull Russian federation and an oportunistic Germany WILL lead to something positive. Another block in Europe, giving her a choice

The only ones who should moan about this and should try fighting against an creation of this is mainly Western Europe and U.S.A. If more and more countries from the former eastern block (maybe some former NATO countries aswell) join Visegrad then it shows how much faith they have in protection from western European allies or U.S.A. Certainly some american tax payers will wake up happy hearing about it. While American department of foreign affairs would locate their attention to either China or an other option. (If there are any).
Mr Grunwald   
17 May 2011
News / Visegrad Battle Group under the command of Poland [261]

responsibility, costs, manpower. It's a reason why a country's PR get's higher when doing such stunts. Not everyone got what it takes.

Hello thats curious, i admit i'm taking Friedman with a massive grain of salt but this news is definitely news.

amen

Frankly, Western-Europe/USA don't really care about Poland/central-eastern Europe. Only thing they want is a buffer zone for themselves, not the time has come to move in an more realistic path.

I can't wait for Crow's comment on this, would he suggest Serbia and other Slavic countries to join it or only co-operate or stand neutral towards it. (maybe hostile?)
Mr Grunwald   
17 May 2011
History / Russians 'tortured to death' in Polish camps? [58]

pedantic.

I am an "pedant" :)

that a majority of Germans are that shameless.

There were some professionals, or "Prussian" officers whom even disliked stories that came from the front. An good example is how Rommel behaved when he had quite a lot of freedom being far away from Germany helping Italians in Africa.

On the eastern front, the SS had the tightiest control on things. The movie Stalingrad depicted that quite good
Still, killings, and all the worst were still done :/
Mr Grunwald   
17 May 2011
History / Russians 'tortured to death' in Polish camps? [58]

Well Napoleon did conquer Germany slightly over two centuries ago.

lol, you must mean Prussia and plenty of minor German states no? :)

That said i differentiate between Germans then and today, you're still not our friends but at least business can be done.

yupp

believe we should respect WWII german soldiers by dumping their bones into public latrines at best.

There were different attitude from different Generals. For instance for the heroes of the defense of the coast. The extreme brutality started after meetings with the NKVD. Before that it was pretty much like a normal war-zone attitude.
Mr Grunwald   
17 May 2011
History / Russians 'tortured to death' in Polish camps? [58]

especially between Germany and France, arch enemies for centuries! :)

Hahaha, don't make me laugh, you for sure ment decades!
English vs French that would been centuries...
Mr Grunwald   
10 May 2011
News / Do Poles take Kaczynski seriously!? [199]

Norway or Swiss have to follow EU-laws in most part already (especially trading) without having a say...They don't live in a vacuum!

That's the reason why I am Pro-EU, we are paying anyway. why the F*** don't have a say in it? (Becaouse my countrymen are stupid and think we will lose our sovereignity... WAKE UP WE ARE ALLREADY!!!)

Okay....Sok got voted prez for a day...what would you change in Poland:

Oooo I wanna hear that! :D
Mr Grunwald   
10 May 2011
News / Do Poles take Kaczynski seriously!? [199]

That kind of defines PO as well :) ...actually, that does a good job of describing a chunk of Poland.

yeah, everyone is a social-conservative, only different tongues :p
Mr Grunwald   
10 May 2011
History / Why did Russia attack Poland in WW2? [178]

It was more to impose communism rather than

I would rather say reinforce, they aided Cuba becaouse they were commies, they aided Vietnam cause of commies, N.Korea cause of commies and so on. If anyone wanted to impose it was their "puppets". They had puppets to reinforce their defence not to spread communism like they wanted in 1917.

Defensive they were but they also kept an iron grip on Poland and still looked outwards.

Yeah but not from point of world domination, but more of security. You can compare the goals of the soviet union from 1917 with after Stalins death in 1953. They didn't invade anyone anymore like they did with baltic states, Poland or Finland. They supported only places were there ere commies in trouble and were an good opportunity for a better defence.

The pickings were pretty easy given the powers involved.

That yes, still blood had to be spilled