PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Posts by ZIMMY  

Joined: 21 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 25 Mar 2022
Threads: Total: 6 / In This Archive: 4
Posts: Total: 1601 / In This Archive: 857
From: Chicago,
Speaks Polish?: tak
Interests: critical thinking

Displayed posts: 861 / page 18 of 29
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
ZIMMY   
2 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

American aid helped the Soviets but nevertheless, they killed 85% of all Germans and therefore it can be said that the Russians are the ones who did the brunt work of destroying the fascists.
ZIMMY   
25 Aug 2010
Genealogy / Polish person's average height? [210]

Polish people must be the tallest because I can't tell you how often I've heard the expression, "I wouldn't touch that with a ten foot Pole". :)
ZIMMY   
21 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

Zimmy I'd love to see you eat by a pack of savage dogs,

You're such a nice feminist. Perhaps you have me confused with this man.

booksamillion.com/product/9780307464538

I wouldn't usually advocate violence, but in your case (and Crow's) I'm happy to make an exception.

You're don't like what I say and you're not good at debating; so this is what you have left?
I do congratulate you on your admission to being violence prone.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

I like the way you threw in the self serving 'my posts are better than yours because yours are ambiguous' at the end.

An interesting comment from someone who in the same post states: "I thought you had more to bring to the table than these vacuous comments and I am, with respect, disappointed that someone who professes an interest in critical thinking would choose to deliver rote rather than analysis. It seems I was mistaken as to your capacity and intent."

.....and you accuse me (lol) of "self serving" commentary as you put it? How about this one: "It seems that again you misconceive or don't apprehend what I was saying..." Another case of that which you accuse me of and by the way, you probably meant 'comprehend' not "apprehend".

Hmm, let's try this "self-serving" comment of yours: "I thought that that was fairly clear to someone who seems to have capacity to discuss these types of issues."

...and there are a couple of others, all in just one post. Space does not avail me if I attempt to quote from some of your other posts which run in the same demeaning manner. ...but I'll use one more of your descending comments which ironically applies to you. "it's been my experience that those types of comments usually mean the person making them feels like they're coming second." Your experience has failed you in the 'look in the mirror' test.

Why would you escort your lawyer out of your office..

I couldn't stand to listen to any more of his lawyer-eeze. I'm sure you can identify with that. Also, he didn't take my suggestion to leave.

What do your philosophical studies arm you with when faced with a person or situation that does not precisely match a political/philosophical mantra?

It is the rare human who can overcome his/her conditioned beliefs and judge another person or scenario neutrally if not objectively. Common sense is the best weapon of survival and needs no mantra.

I'd much prefer to hear your take on what he says

His influence has been immense in academia, even used as a base line of thought by professors who teach 'subjective truths' to their receptive mushy minded students.

You're trying to catch me out here aren't you.

There is a difference between self-defense which may entail killing someone and murder.
One is moral and the other is wrong.

Typical abuses by privileged women who corrupt the judicial system in this link;

Unfortunately most get away with their lies and schemes because western law discriminates against men. Women are encouraged to file false charges which ruin men's lives. Even though this man finally got justice, the mental pain and worry must have been hell for him.

Germany seems to be waking up to this; fathersandfamilies.org/?p=9317

From the link: "For the umpteenth time, 35 years of scrupulous research on DV shows that women and men commit domestic violence equally. When it comes to abuse and neglect of children, mothers - at least those in the U.S. - do twice as much as fathers."

Of course, sentencing is still not as severe for the privileged class (women); glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4774

From the link: "she attacked him with a hammer, hitting him on the head multiple times. He managed to escape. She was charged with felony aggravated assault. Evidence at the scene showed the crime to be premeditated. Her sentence? Thirty days in jail. Her defense? Battered woman syndrome.

This is one of several phony female-only defenses which are denied men.

Hopefully, Polish courts will not go the way of the feminized western judicial systems which continue to be discriminatory. What is ignored are the children who often grow up bitter and hateful against their mothers who in their self-serving schemes fail to see the long term effects on them.
ZIMMY   
12 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

ZIMMY:
feminist apologists like you.

Why would you say this - are you trying to be provocative?

Glad to know that you're not a feminist apologist.

I fail to see however how your opinion on liberals has anything to do with my point. Did you understand it?

Yes, you communicate like a liberal.

ZIMMY:
I've often said, 'with liberals, everything is relative'.

Isn't it though? Except perhaps with indisputables such as the earth being flat, 1 plus 1 equals 2 and so on?

Oh? ...then you are a liberal.

Doesn't the fact that your 'truth' being at odds with my 'truth' support the notion that there is no one indisputable truth but rather a whole set of 'truths' relative in strength, merit and credibility to every different person or set of persons.

No, truth is not malleable. It isn't putty that can reshaped to fit someone's beliefs. Just because you may believe something to be true doesn't mean it is factually true.

Or are you saying that the 'truths' you believe to be true must be true simply because you don't ascribe to relativity and because of that your truth is better and cannot be challenged simply because relativity is ridiculous?

A lawyer tried to talk to me like that once but I escorted him out of my office. What gobblygook. There are facts and there is bullcrap. I'm a proponent of facts.

Murder is wrong, in relative terms, and subjectively speaking

Murder is plain wrong; no 'ifs' about it. Trying to spin it in some way only diminishes the person attempting to do so.

you can't have meant me to 'be objective' because if you had, then you wouldn't have precluded me from arguing objective notions of mitigation or self-defence,

Self defense is not murder.

Am I wrong here, or am I testing you?

Yes you are wrong and no, your 'relative' style of discourse doesn't reach a level which tests me.

I'm unfamiliar with this bloke and this philosophy. Sounds fascinating though - can you elaborate? How many advocates are there?

Just google or yahoo him. Universities, those bastions of liberalism use him to make the same kinds of arguments that you make. Nothing is real, everything is subjective and there are no truths. Many professors like this sort of dream world because then anything they say can be taken as truth. It's madness of course.

I'm still out in 'God's country' so my retorts, which are not ambiguous like yours, will be few until I get back.
ZIMMY   
11 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

Have you dealt with any domestic violence matters personally Zimmy? If so, do the Fibert studies accord with what you’ve experienced?

Yes and yes. I'll only give you two examples out of several I can site. I was watching a couple on Rush Street in Chicago who had too much to drink. The young woman kept hitting her beau on the shoulder and he was telling her to "cut it out". Finally, he struck her on the shoulder and she immediately began dialing the police. I watched this play out and the cops were ready to take this young guy to jail based only on her charge. I stepped up and told the real scenario to the cops and even then it took about 15 more minutes before the police decided to leave the young man alone.

Another time, back in the 'old neighborhood' a woman beat up her husband who called the police. Despite having a bruised cheekbone and other signs of being battered, the police arrested him.

The above sequence of events happens more often than is realized by feminist apologists like you. That's why the vast Fiebert studies are believable. They register real incidents and not necessarily those officially reported which totally underestimate violence by women.

I would go further than that and say that it's impossible for people to be objective and go even further by saying that the only objective truth is that truth is subjective.

No doubt you believe this and indeed, lots of liberals believe this because then any argument they make seems true to them. Facts are not necessary. I've often said, 'with liberals, everything is relative'.

It surprises me how many advocates of Michel Foucault's faulty subjective philosophy there are. The idea that there is 'my truth', 'your truth', 'their truth' etc is ridiculous, yet this is how some people attempt to argue.

I'll give you a definitive truth or fact. Murder is wrong, now try to be "subjective" about that. (I'll cut off any attempt to equate self-defense, etc as part of some "subjective" definition).
ZIMMY   
9 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

I posted late last week quite a detailed response to your last posts

Let me guess; you made excuses for women. You probably asked the 'what if' questions which nobody asks of men. At any rate, I'm sure that there wasn't a good retort to the Fiebert studies which speak for themselves.

I run into recalcitrant people who don't like what is put in front of them all the time. They have a problem with cognitive dissonance which upsets their belief system. It's difficult for people to change their minds about something they've always believed to be true but which is not. This seems to be the case with domestic violence as it pertains to both men and women.

It's difficult for so many people to be objective when so much cultural brainwashing clouds the real truth, and so much of this is due to "political correctness" which makes some people feel good although it masks the real truth.

thanks for your input and catch you around champ.

Well, thank you and the same to you.

"There are two ways to slide easily through life; to believe everything or to doubt everything; both ways save us from thinking." ..........................Alfred Korzybski
ZIMMY   
6 Aug 2010
Love / All Polish women can't be nutters can they? [257]

i don't consider somebody's problems as facts...

Other people's problems are or can be facts, and that's true whether you consider them or not.

i don't really care about you :D

If you saw my sparkling eyes and my sweet smile, you'd care a lot. lol
but having said that; I somewhat care about the people here; after all, most of you are really alright despite being so frequently wrong about things.

I think that's why a man needs a pair of smiling eyes to find his happy.

No, no, you're confusing my (sparkling) eyes with my "smiling" heart.
ZIMMY   
6 Aug 2010
Love / All Polish women can't be nutters can they? [257]

your idea about women makes you a sad person..

Knowing so much about women (and men) makes me a happy camper. The unhappy people are the ones who are blind to reality.

there is no "happy" in your posts..

I've injected humor (and yes sarcasm) in many other forums here. Perhaps you are oblivious to them or to humor.

i find strange...
you shouldn't generalize that much, btw.....

Thanks for your concern but don't worry so much about me. I would be one of the (if not the) healthiest people you could ever meet both mentally and physically. As to my generalizing about something so obvious as men being the proactive ones when it comes to initial approaches, paying for dates, etc, etc, it seems that uncomfortable facts are bothersome to you. Is that related to the 'rejection' concept that so many "empowered" women have a problem with?
ZIMMY   
6 Aug 2010
Love / All Polish women can't be nutters can they? [257]

Seanus: "I remember one from a few years ago that wanted to date me (and more she said). When I told her that it wasn't a good idea (she had a BF), she flew off the handle and immediately went running back to her BF, tears flooding down her face."

Women are unaccustomed to rejection. They see themselves as the 'sought after sex' and prefer that artificial role. If women had to do the courting, spending of money, and the usual first approaches as men then, and only then, would they realize how soft they have it.

Good for you that you didn't cheat; it's never worth it. Never!
ZIMMY   
6 Aug 2010
Life / What is the reason for POLISH jokes ? [486]

so called Polish jokes were at their peak like in the 1970's.

By the mid 80's Polish jokes were a no-no. Whenever I was about to hear one I would stop the joke teller in mid joke and ask him/her what their ancestry was and ask them to use their heritage in the joke. The 'look' on their faces always made me smile. Only one instance led to violence and that was when the joke teller attempted to hit my fist with his face (yes, yes, he started it).

Today, the only acceptable jokes are the ones shown in sitcoms and advertising where the male is the acknowledged buffoon.
ZIMMY   
5 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

some of the studies reveal that the female survey participants purportedly disclosed to the surveyor that they initiated DV.

Many females admitted that they initiated domestic violence, so did many males and in the end the figures suggested that slightly more females began a dispute by slapping, punching or just plain hitting.

are their any differences between the potential for exaggeration and/or downplay between males and females when making admissions in these contexts?

The studies were done by hundreds of unrelated professionals who had no ax to grind.

The actual questions asked.

The same for both males and females.

How many of the participants who admitted being abused actually took steps to apply for a protection order. If they didn't, then why not?

It is indisputable that women file formal charges in much higher numbers than men (in the U.S.). It doesn't take much common sense to figure out why. Men are laughed at when they complain, and the culture of "take it like a man" is still in force. Additionally, women have many organizations which tell them what to do and how to do it. Men rarely have support groups.

I found the studies surprising.

Most people do and that's because the general media has frequently publicized 'womens victimhood' while ignoring real concerns of men. Even on Fathers Day, there are stories demeaning men as abusers, deadbeat dads, etc. That doesn't happen on Mothers Day.

Stockholm Syndrome analogy.

Are you suggesting that only women get the Stockholm Syndrome and not men? You seem to want to make some sort of excuse for women which is typical in western cultures. This also smacks of psycho-babble which many use in justifying abhorent female behavior.

Is it the case that US law automatically favours mothers over fathers?

Well duh! This isn't exactly a secret. Fact is, men stick with a marriage because they are afraid of losing their kids. Women usually don't have that fear. That's the main reason men don't initiate divorce as frequently as women do.

".......US law automatically favours mothers over fathers?"

A point of order here. Most laws are neutral but how they are enforced is another matter. Still, there are laws which favor women but this sort of discrimination is acceptable because western culture favors women.

VAWA (Violence Against Women Act) is an example of such a law. According to attorney Lisa Scott:

"The existence of male victims threatens gender feminists because it knocks the underpinnings out of their theory, that the "patriarchy" causes men to abuse women. The DV industry has succeeded in creating the "victimarchy." With VAWA in their corner, women win no matter what: victim or abuser, they can do no wrong."

Women and womens concerns are funded much more lavishly compared to mens and by a large margin. Ms Scott continues:

"VAWA funds battered women's shelters and their misandrist staff, always ready to welcome another customer for their anti-male, anti-father and anti-family agenda. Ask a victim advocate what causes domestic violence, and she will immediately blame our "patriarchal society," ensuring that only men get the blame."

....just an example (with a multitude of inherent complications)
ZIMMY   
5 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

Ozi Dan, I recommend that you go back to my post #54 and log on to the Fiebert link which is the first one in that post. Take 15 minutes and read at random the various conclusions all those individual yet diverse studies have come to (just read the last sentences after each study). Explain how so many analyses' have come to the conclusion that women initiate at least as much domestic violence as men.

You might also want to link here; abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=2741047. I recommend reading the article and then watching the informative video.

Then get back to me.
ZIMMY   
3 Aug 2010
Polonia / New Polish Portal About Germany [10]

Interesting statistics on which Germans voted for Nazis....(Catholic Germans vs Protestant Germans voting Nazi)
ZIMMY   
3 Aug 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

I highly recommend reading this article and then watching the video. The abuse and rape industries have an anti-male platform which should shock men and women of good will.

If some men here don't believe that they have an uphill fight in the area of equality than this link should sober them on that thought.

s-data.current.com/news/91283125_maine-false-rape-witch-hunt.htm

Listen carefully to the wife's comments in mid video. Listen to how "empowered" she is as a woman. It's a horror story. This is not an untypical scenario. Thousands of men are caught up in this type of manner annually because women know that they can get away with framing men.
ZIMMY   
2 Aug 2010
History / Endecja - State Sponsored Anti Semitism 1935 - 1939. [138]

MareGaea: I learned that the myth that Communism was Jewish, a fable that somewhere in the previous era came into existence is still very vivid in the Polish perception. But can anybody explain why this is ONLY in Poland the case?

Are you really unaware that this is a common perception almost everywhere? Here is a typical anti semetic presentation: ... The 'tone' of this piece muddles any facts that may be present.

What does this man stand for?

He wants to take back Berlin.......
In the video he has a dildo in his right hand and a gun in his left hand. Makes me think he is right handed.....
ZIMMY   
2 Aug 2010
Love / How to Make (Polish?) Women happy? [96]

Here's how to make both men and women happy.
the-spearhead.com/2010/07/31/10-things-i%E2%80%99ll-teach-my-sons-about-women/#comment-35524
ZIMMY   
1 Aug 2010
History / Endecja - State Sponsored Anti Semitism 1935 - 1939. [138]

Probably every single element of Shoah movie was true.
Combined together and presented to some ignorant public it creates really anti-Polsh picture of Holocaust.

O yea, for example, in one scene a young Polish boy is seen pantomiming 'cutting of the throat' as the train full of Jews is passing him by on its way to a concentration camp. This was interpreted as some vial act instead of the probability that this boy was warning the passengers of their fate.

...and so it goes.
ZIMMY   
31 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

Your questions are about your opinion,

It's a well known fact that men in tv advertising are subject to being seen as dummies, stupid, etc. It is "politically incorrect" to show women in this manner. That's where the current culture is today. There have been very few exceptions to this as to make it a mute point. If you don't know this than you are not worth responding to - nevertheless I can give dozens (actually several hundred) examples of ads in the past few years showing men in a very negative light; very few exist for women; perhaps I'll do so tomorrow as I'm on my way to the beach.

In the meantime, another man's opinion; unfortunately true.

As to domestic violence opinion, I guess you disagree with hundreds of experts, the ones compiled by Fiebert. You must be right, while their "275 scholarly investigations: 214 empirical studies and 61 reviews" must be wrong.

stop providing sources written by conspiracy theorist lol

Like Fiebert? Yea, several hundred unrelated studies by academic professionals, most of them with a liberal bent were compiled by Martin Fiebert who had no ax to grind but wanted the objective truth. Perhaps you can answer specifically how so many studies have come to the same conclusion? Your mangina friend couldn't.

Anything you disagree with is a "conspiracy" even by the many women authors who have seen the light. Of course, you wouldn't know the truth even if it introduced itself to you, sat on your face and said hello.
ZIMMY   
31 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

It is pathetic that you pose in such an obvious way, no self confident person needs to pose.

Still no answers to my questions, eh? People who don't answer questions put to them are the real posers. I laid it on the line, but your method of discourse is to attempt to change the subject (a typical but cowardly liberal ploy).

Aphro is one of the many fine posters here.

She has not contributed to this thread except to deride those who have. That may be the definition of a "fine poster" to you but then you have that subjective "liberal gaze" which stunts real growth.

Quick edit; the only posing I'll be doing today will be at North Avenue Beach (Chicago)
ZIMMY   
31 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

you've got NOTHING.

Lol, easy to say, although stupid since my informative posts are here for all to read. I've given several examples let alone the Fiebert Studies. That's more than enough for now although there's plenty of additional evidence in reserve. I've asked Barney several questions which he and you are unable to answer. Until then, it is you who have given nothing.

One for the road: rense.com/general82/dom.htm

Do gays batter as well?

Of course and possibly in higher numbers than hetero couples.

From the link:

"Homosexual households are also more prone to domestic violence. For example: "The incidence of domestic violence among gay men is nearly double that in the heterosexual population," according to D. Island and P. Letellier in Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them (New York: Haworth Press, 1991). A study in the Journal of Social Service Research reported that "slightly more than half of the [lesbians surveyed] reported that they had been abused by a female lover/partner." (G. Lie and S. Gentlewarrior, "Intimate Violence in Lesbian Relationships: Discussion of Survey Findings and Practice Implications," No. 15, 1991.)"

Are you attempting a bit of male bashing with your "Shaming" language?

Just with you but not with Aphrodisiac because she has no shame.
ZIMMY   
31 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

I asked you to post "objective truth" several times

I've given examples which people see and read daily. You did not comment on them in any specific manner. Since you like to float a large cloud which allows you to dismissively ignore several points at-a-time, it would seem that pinning you down to one example after another is the way to go with you. I'll help you out; Why is it "politically correct " to demean males in ads but "politically incorrect" to do so with females? What is it about a culture that discriminates in this odd manner? What is the "objective truth" here?

what you did post you hadn’t read

Wrong again. What you picked out I don't dispute but it was not the major issue. You danced around the fact that women initiate violence as often as men in domestic scenarios. Inherently, you do not want to know this fact.

Calling me a liberal is not an argument

No, but it's the truth. Others should be aware of where you're coming from. After all, it's your "liberal gaze" on this issue that is at odds with reality.

you dont know how to approach this subject in an unemotional way.

Lol, thanks for the chuckle. (You just made me drop my cigar ash on the keyboard.). If enjoyment is considered an emotion, and it is, then perhaps you are correct.

provide solid evidence for what you claim.

I claimed what the Fiebert studies have proved and gave you a link for them. I suggest that you read what the introduction states; "275 scholarly investigations: 214 empirical studies and 61 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 365,000.

Feel free to dissect the various studies, many of them done by liberal academic types and in most instances, not related to each other so how can all these analyses come to similar conclusions. No liberal spin please.

This has become tedious.

Spoken like a true effete snob. ... but that aspect of character shows in your writing as well.
ZIMMY   
31 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

You posted an opinion ignoring the vast majority of the media

The vast majority of the media (in the U.S.) is liberal and as past CBS correspondent Bernard Goldberg noted "We accept at face value whatever women's groups say. Why? because women have sold themselves to us as an oppressed group and any oppressed group gets a free ride in the press. It's no secret.

Differing views of the same image (commonly known as the male vs female gaze) is necessary for a basic understanding of any visual medium this seems beyond your myopic view.

The tv ads, sitcoms, books and news reports are there for the "female gaze and the male gaze" to judge objectively. Your psychoanalytical babble gets into the world of the subjective which liberals love because objective truth is too raw, that is, too truthful.

With liberals everything is relative. There are no truths.

Speaking of the "male gaze", a professor in Toronto (some 8 years ago) was suspended for "Lookism". A female student complained that she was bothered by his alleged staring. The feminists wrote hundreds of letters supporting her and the school capitulated. This is the kind of "politically correct" power that feminists seek.

your hobbyhorse is based upon a predetermined view

You sound like so many blowhard elitist professors that abound. Fact is, my strong opinions are based on fact. In short, I overview scenarios, you seem to be caught in them. For example, the next tv commercial that I will see that shows someone as a fool will show a male. That's not some "gaze" that can be reinterpreted except perhaps by proponents of Michel Foucault who would be proud of all the nonsense happening today.
ZIMMY   
30 Jul 2010
News / Poland - the least liked German neighbour. [210]

I've frequently disagreed with BB but since I am a magnanimous man, I wouldn't refuse him buying me dinner and all I can drink for the evening. I'm just that kind of nice guy.
ZIMMY   
30 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

Yes Southern rape happens between two people when one person is not consenting, doesnt matter if they are married or not..rape is rape.

That's not quite true although feminists would like you to believe that. There is a difference between some thug attacking a woman violently, threatening her and then raping her and a woman who regrets having sex the next morning and thus calling that rape. The definition of rape has been so expanded by feminist organizations that it can mean almost anything now.

Just bored with the constant harping about Feminist domination.

You asked me the questions and I gave you examples. It's noticeable that you failed to disprove my media comments which are obvious even to the most casual observer.

As I have said, women have suffered abuse for years,

Yes, yes, we've been hearing that tired old song for forty years now. It's been the domestic violence card played over and over 'ad infinitum'. It's only when someone like me attempts to balance this refrain with objective analysis that feminists like you and manginas like Barney go ballistic. How dare men attempt that sacred 'victim status' platform that only women should have?

I asked if hitting back is fine, not restraining.

When the shoes on the other foot, misandrists like Amathyst always try to wiggle or spin their way out. People like her have not evolved sufficiently to be able to overview the full condition(s) of humanity, not just the sex they happened to be born into. They only see their race, religion, or in her case, gender as the center point of their beliefs. At least PGTX was honest enough with her answer which of course happens to be the correct one.

He was dressed up as a girl by his mother from a young age and made to watch "what ever happened to baby Jane" this was bound to have an affect on him sooner or later

You do a grave injustice to a woman you do not know.

Back to "Battered husbands" in Poland:

"Men hardly ever report abuse because they are ashamed of being beaten or humiliated by a woman. It is against a stereotype of a strong, tough man," says Prof. Dariusz Dolinski from the Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities. Men are also afraid that police will not believe them if they report that domestic violence was directed towards them.

Often, as in the U.S. when a battered man finally does call the police, as frequently as not, they arrest him anyway because he is the male. Feminists have no problem with this and even deny that men are ever abused.
ZIMMY   
30 Jul 2010
News / Poland - the least liked German neighbour. [210]

It's the Slavs who were the agressors the whole time, shoving poor Germans this way and that!!!

Poles should take back Berlin.........
Displaced Germans should be sent to the beautiful island of Haiti to mix with the friendly population who are desparately in need of sausage shops.
ZIMMY   
30 Jul 2010
Love / 'Battered husbands' - still a taboo subject in Poland [387]

So you cannot produce evidence

As far as media goes the evidence is all around you in advertising, sitcoms and news features. That doesn't need explanation, only a thinking brain. You remind me of the man who never saw the ocean. When he was first thrown into the Atlantic, he said, "why is there water everywhere?"

Betty Freidans groundbreaking book in 1963...

all the rest are not

That was a less than intelligent reply. Of course all the rest were not feminist male-bashing.
There are books on every subject. The point is to compare feminist anti male books with men writing anti female books. You aren't that dense.....

He is thinking about divorce but they have two children and he knows that she will do anything to seperate them from the father after the divorce.

That's the major problem. Men don't initiate divorce as often as women do because they realize how unfair the court systems are. Men don't want to lost their kids. Women are not as inhibited to file for divorce because the loss of children is not something that concerns them. Unless they are druggies or some kind of provable troublemaker, they'll get the kids, even if they are the violent ones during marriage.

nobody forced him to marry her. It was his own choice.

There has been a mini marriage strike in the U.S. as men have become more aware of the unfairness in marriage. (Paul McCartney, next time make a pre-nupt, better yet, don't get married).

dontmarry.wordpress.com