Study /
The worst of Polish education. No wonder Polish universities are bottom of the list. [142]
Lawyers make heavy use of fallacies.I remember I had a conversation with a distinct lawyer and he started argumentswith fallacies it was unbelievable.He used 3-4 fallacies together even if he could get straight to the point without using them.I recognized them quite easily and answered him in internet mode like it was a conversation in PF.His arguments were in level directed towards the general public no way he could convince me by them.After my objections he became quite angry and agitated.He started calling names,personal attack and did not leave me to speak anymore.
In general if you want to totally confuse a lawyer just change his perception of the audience.Just put the bar a little higher above his intellectual abilities and he will be crashed.Of course this is a refined fallacy as well.Lawyers and proffessors hate to admit that they represent the average or common sense so he will never use this argument of average and common sense.
Another easy way to beat a lawyer is to refuse to reveal the evidence for your claims until you like to present them.In this way the laawyer gets confused because he does not know if you have evidence or not and makes incorrect defense.This is the soviet method.It is common practice between lawyers to disclose their evidence to each other even as opposing parts before the trial it is considered to be a gentlemen's agreement.
In general I have seen the transformation of law students from normal people to arrogant pricks.Since I am aware of their intelligence status I like to expose them one way or another.Law lets in for ambiguous terms and you can really have a lot of fun.
