yes but nature is nature. you're assuming all catholics are perfect, i on the other hand know the reality.
I haven't assumed anything of the sort. I don't think you read terribly well. Go back and try again.
but there are plenty of people with whom religion doesn't sit well.
There always have been.
religion is on a decline, in general.
I know this is "popular knowledge," but it's also not correct. It's based on the false premise that unaffiliated religious people constitute the same confessional group as atheists, which, obviously, they don't. Statistically, diversity of religions practiced, including agnosticism and the unaffiliated religious, is expanding in most Western countries, but the number of believers in all three Abrahamic confessions is also increasing. In some places, certain denominational numbers have dropped of late, particularly among Protestants, but that does not hold true for the breadth of religions present.
puzzling how you think..
Hmm, yes, puzzling that you might write something, and someone who disagrees with it based on the evidence at hand says he disagrees. Very, very puzzling...
rofl, that's the funnies thing yet tonight. ok, cough up the dough bud. PM me for my addy, you can send me a blank $50 MO. thanks. :D
Perhaps. However, the evidence may be judged by anyone so inclined, from (a) the particularly awkward use of colloquial language by both you and crocker2 as though it were written by someone not used to speaking using the terms you each were using, (b) the juvenile nature, though crocker2 with a phony and contrived direction, of the messages posted in the same time span but never at the same moment (that is, unprovoked attack messages), (c) the identical session sign-in time of both you and crocker2 when neither had been logged in during the hours before, (d) the same being true with the exception of the sign-in time (no longer available) in the only previous appearance of crocker2 at this forum, and finally, (e) I tend to notice when someone calls me the very dated term "homie," as crocker2 did, and then only a couple minutes later, someone else calls me the similar, equally dated, and awkward term "homesteak," as you did in this thread.
haha, dude, u look lik one those fake businessmen. gurls go 4 da blak men anywayz, so who u foolin, foolio?
som funny sht brah. rofl
ye plk, u kno were it at bra, hahaa
dzady, dude, man, u gotta man up, nd fase da fact. al da gurlz want da blak choco!
Have you encountered many trolls in this forum that attack forum-goers and then, seemingly without precedent, complement a forum-goer?
And how many conversations happen on forums where both people call each other "brah?"
Well, perhaps you're not the same person, little guy, but anyone participating in this forum may be the judge of that for themselves.
If it can only survive by sucking the blood of a host, it is a parasite and people have the right to decide whether they allow parasites to carry on sucking their blood or not.
Right, another very mature take on this issue.