PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / News  % width1108

What did Poland get out of the wars and struggles for others?


HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
15 Dec 2008 /  #871
Victory Parade Number, issued June 15, 1946 has a long list of countries represented in the Victory parade at the end of which it states “Apart from the USSR, only Poland and Yugoslavia were not represented among our Allies".

That is what I typed in my post then Harry comes along and accuses me of lying, pathetically, too.
Harry  
16 Dec 2008 /  #872
For those of you who still insist on changing the facts.

You mean the Poles and Plastic Poles who have spent 30 pages of this thread insisting that Poles/free Poles did not take part in the London parade because they were not invited?

Celinski you don’t see history differently they are just pathetically bad liars. The Illustrated London News - Victory Parade Number, issued June 15, 1946 has a long list of countries represented in the Victory parade at the end of which it states “Apart from the USSR, only Poland and Yugoslavia were not represented among our Allies". But I’m sure they will dispute this article on the grounds that the reporter did not have his contact lenses on at the time or has taken a bathroom break when the Poles marched by.

You are lying yet again. Nobody has claimed in this thread that Poles marched in the London parade. You are not able to argue with the facts we present and so you attempt to claim we say things which we did not say. How utterly pathetic.

An invitation was extended to 25 Polish airmen who took part in the Battle of Britain and only to those men. Needless to say with the political situation such as it was they refused to attend on the grounds that they could not be a part of a ceremony from which Polish Army (loyal to the legitimate Polish government in Exile) was excluded.

Thank you very much for telling us this. We already knew it because on the very first page of this thread somebody posted “Actually there was a place for Polish servicemen in the London Victory Parade. Polish airmen from the free Polish forces were invited (even though no other 'free' forces were invited, only invites went to official governments, the airmen got a special honour to recognise their contribution to the war) but they refused to attend because they didn't think enough London Poles were invited.” That poster was me. Thank you for posting exactly the same information as I posted at the beginning of this thread. Should I call you a Jew because you agree with me? You told me that I interpret historical facts a certain way because of my “Jewish bigotry toward Poles”, now that you share my exact interpretation of the historical facts (i.e. free Poles were invited but refused to attend because not enough free Poles were invited) you must also be showing “Jewish bigotry toward Poles”. I suggest you pop down to you local Mohel and get a Brit Milah done.

Harry, May I suggest the usage of "she see's this history different".

You can suggest what you want, it won’t change the simple facts of the matter: no Poles attended the London parade because neither the free Poles nor the representatives of the official government of Poland bothered to turn up.
celinski  31 | 1258  
16 Dec 2008 /  #873
Celinski you don’t see history differently they are just pathetically bad liars.

I know this I was just trying to stop the usage of "liar". Must be a lot of guilt on their part to continue to try to defend such a angry manner.
Seanus  15 | 19666  
16 Dec 2008 /  #874
It stemmed from Churchill's lack of caring. As long as he had his glory, that was enough.

The Poles didn't come because they felt offended.
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #875
Should I call you a Jew because you agree with me? You told me that I interpret historical facts a certain way because of my “Jewish bigotry toward Poles”, now that you share my exact interpretation of the historical facts (i.e. free Poles were invited but refused to attend because not enough free Poles were invited) you must also be showing “Jewish bigotry toward Poles”. I suggest you pop down to you local Mohel and get a Brit Milah done.

I don't think you have jewish bigotry toward Poles, just typical british bigotry. The jews living in Poland were Polish. Get that straight. They were polish and discriminated against based on their ethnicity by government policy because of idoitic heartless bigots in Poland, which didn't include everyone. Pilsudski tried to change things but, unfortunately, it didn't work out.
Harry  
16 Dec 2008 /  #876
The jews living in Poland were Polish. Get that straight.

I'm entirely aware that Jews can also be Poles, thank you for pointing it out again.

I don't think you have jewish bigotry toward Poles, just typical british bigotry.

So you aren't anti-semitic, just plain old racist. Fair enough.
Piorun  - | 655  
16 Dec 2008 /  #877
I suggest you pop down to you local Mohel and get a Brit Milah done.

No thanks I’ll pass.

You told me that I interpret historical facts a certain way because of my “Jewish bigotry toward Poles”

I never said “Jewish bigotry” I said “bigotry”, be it American or British or whatever but if you’re Jewish and take it as such that’s OK too really a bigot is a bigot, it does not matter if he’s American, British or Jewish.

You are lying yet again. Nobody has claimed in this thread that Poles marched in the London parade.

If you did not claim that then it must be one big misunderstanding and few pages of needless discussion. Since the very first page of this tread you are doing everything in your power to put Poland and anything that has to do with Poland down, you will resort to any trick in a book, no matter how ridicules it might sound to discredit Poland. For instance, on Page 1 Post 9 of this very thread, you did not like the statement that Poland was the first country to fight the Germans and fought to the very last day of the War.

“You mean the old "Poland: First to fight" line? That isn't actually true is it? Well not unless the currently accepted history of the Gliwice incident is completely wrong and Poland actually did attack that radio tower. If Poland didn't, Poland would be second to fight because Germany attacked Poland and therefore Germany was first to fight.”

Now there is no way one could misinterpret to what the OP means when he said “Poland was first to fight” but you did not like that little but very significant word “first” in that statement did you Harry? So you go on and you make up this ridicules argument to what it actually means first to fight. FYI the statement you tried so hard to disprove is still valid because in order to have a fight you have to have someone to fight back otherwise it’s known as beating. If you wanted to be technical about it you would have said that Germany “initiated” the fight and Poland was first country to oppose it, but this would not do since it would still make Poland “first” to fight back. So like I said before you twist the things around, they became half truths, omitting a word here and there, in this case “initiate” and bending the facts to fit your point of view. For this statement you called me a liar. (You do that quiet often it seems). You do this throughout this thread and as a matter of fact throughout this Forum. So my question to you still stands, BTW you never did answer it. What is your shtick? What is your motivation for this since you live in Poland, If not just pure hatred and bigotry?

If you hate it so much GTFO.
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #878
So you aren't anti-semitic, just plain old racist. Fair enough.

If anyone is racist it is probably you which explains why you are here bashing. Your divide and conquer tactics don't work on me.
joepilsudski  26 | 1387  
16 Dec 2008 /  #879
Jews are not the center of the universe, although they would have you believe they are...People are not rascist because they don't worship Jews, or do not consider them 'special'...The Jewish culture is based on two pillars: 1) The overwhelming desire to accumulate money...2) Constant complaining.




HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #880
You are such a bigot. Do you know what the real Jozef Pilsudsky tried to do? You aren't being fair. I doubt you understand politics. You do not have the good of the human race in mind. There is this thing called "human rights" as the real Joe Pilsudsky was well aware. You could learn a thing or two from him if you opened up your heart some.
joepilsudski  26 | 1387  
16 Dec 2008 /  #881
I know what he did...He prevented the Jewish Bolsheviks from overunning Central Europe in 1919...Otherwise, the Communist virus would have overwhelmed the continent...What did Jewish Bolsheviks like Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kaganovich & Beria and all the others think about human rights?..And it is not about individual Jews, but about a certain mindset.
Kilkline  1 | 682  
16 Dec 2008 /  #882
The jews living in Poland were Polish.

Debatable. Some were and some werent, from what I've read. There was a large section of Jews in Poland who despite having ancestry going back a number of generations in Poland, couldnt speak Polish and knew no Poles. Many Jews would also refer to 'Poles' in the 3rd person, not including themselves in the definition. Other Jews would identify themselves as Poles though. Not a straighforward situation.
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #883
I know what he did...He prevented the Jewish Bolsheviks from overunning Central Europe in 1919...

Pilsudsky was a socialist. You have a very poor understanding of what was going on. Many people were impoverished in that part of Europe. Many people of all different ethnicities had very little. This drove the revolutions.

Pilsudsky fought Bolsheviks but you have to remember he had society in mind, he helped many poles of all ethnicities. You don't grasp that many Europeans are mixed with all kinds of ethnic groups. Semetic tribes, as well as Asians. That's the reality. He fought bolsheviks, not jews, okay?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
16 Dec 2008 /  #884
You don't grasp that many Europeans are mixed with all kinds of ethnic groups. Semetic tribes, as well as Asians.

Och nö...not your "all yurpeens have jewish ancestors anyhow" diatribe again!
(If it would be so there wouldn't had been those lots of pogroms nor the Holocaust)
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #885
You have some semetic and asian because of the Roman empire and mongol invasions. In your part of Europe, there's a lot of ethnic mixing and self hate because so many of you have been brainwashed into believing purer is better. Just because someone speaks German doesn't always mean they are German.

But Germans tend to believe they are.

You have assimilated semetics and asians into your family tree.

I thought I read somewhere that Slavs came from somewhere in Iran, originally, and migrated or something...so there ya go. That is what I am talking about. Thousands of years of migrating. All kinds of people migrating all over Europe. Europe sending millions to other countries too. You have to remember that. You Europeans have sent your masses out to conquer the world. I swear there is so much ignorance on this forum. It really does attract some of the most ignorant people. I don't know why that is. It's a shame.

You do realize Europeans have branched out and left the continent over the years, don't you????
LOL
Good lord. This must be a joke. You cannot be that naive.
celinski  31 | 1258  
16 Dec 2008 /  #886
If it would be so there wouldn't had been those lots of pogroms nor the Holocaust)

Quote

It was all Polish that were to cleaned out when Poland was first attacked. This changed to Jewish when Nazi's went after Soviets. This leads to the question of the number of Jewish Soviet military.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
16 Dec 2008 /  #887
You have assimilated semetics and asians into your family tree.

Why are you so obsessed with that? Do you hate Europeans? :)

I swear there is so much ignorance on this forum. It really does attract some of the most ignorant people. I don't know why that is. It's a shame.

Now aren't we poor PFers are blessed now that you have come to show us the light!
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #888
Why are you so obsessed with that? Do you hate Europeans? :)

You can't be serious!!! The real question is: Why would you associate that statement with hate??? How is it hateful?

History has shown us all you cannot keep people in one place. If someone really wants to go somewhere they will. It's a fundamental right. We all have the right to go where we want.
VaFunkoolo  6 | 654  
16 Dec 2008 /  #889
I swear there is so much ignorance on this forum.

Thats an understatement

But what do you expect on a Polish forum...?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
16 Dec 2008 /  #890
You can't be serious!!! The real question is: Why would you associate that statement with hate??? How is it hateful?

I dunno, you tell me?
You deny the natives of Europe their heritage...want to make them a mud pit of the world...for me that speaks of contempt and even hate.

Oh and Europeans who believe in their heritage are not self-hating, quite the contrary...they are very conscious about their past and roots and cherish them!
Piorun  - | 655  
16 Dec 2008 /  #891
But what do you expect on a Polish forum...?

Wow VaFunkoolo finely read something that he can actually understand, so he had to speak out.
VaFunkoolo  6 | 654  
16 Dec 2008 /  #892
It seems we have both reached an understanding
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
16 Dec 2008 /  #893
You deny the natives of Europe their heritage...want to make them a mud pit of the world...for me that speaks of contempt and even hate.

You have mixed heritage. Your part of Europe is VERY mixed and you have to accept it. You have to remember Europe hasn't always been like it is now. At one time the Roman Empire included parts of Asia and Africa and people who came from these lands lived in Europe. Germany is close to Austria and Austria is close to Italy and Rome was in Italy and Rome conquered many places. You were eventually conquered by Holy Romans which is why Germans became catholics, before the reformation. Then again, you germans have always been kind of disgruntled.
Harry  
16 Dec 2008 /  #894
Wow VaFunkoolo finely read something that he can actually understand, so he had to speak out.

Oi vay! You've got a lot to learn about Jewish humour before people will start thinking you are a proper Jew.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
16 Dec 2008 /  #895
You have mixed heritage. Your part of Europe is VERY mixed and you have to accept it.

Oh I accept it...but the case is I'm mixed with other Europeans! :)

The Romans surely wished to have Germania as a roman province and to settle but they came only as far as Cologne (fighting breaks with the tribes not withstanding). In the end it was germanic tribes who conquered and settled in what was Rome!

PS: The old Romans were Europeans to btw.....very germanic looking! :)
Just look at those marble statues...small lips, high straight thin noses, long
faces...Europeans! /March-Titans-History-White-Race/

You were eventually conquered by Holy Romans which is why Germans became catholics

Wasn't it more a religious matter? Is that now ethnical too???
(And only one half of Germany is catholic btw)

Then again, you germans have always been kind of disgruntled.

...don't you confuse that with straightforward honesty!
JulietEcho  3 | 100  
18 Dec 2008 /  #896

- Where about in Krakow? From the link you provided I can really place this cementary on the map...
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
19 Dec 2008 /  #897
I have a question. What about all the other slavic ethnicities in Poland, Kashubians, etc...are they denied their Polishness because they are not ethnic Poles? I read the book The Tin Drum. It said a Kashubian is too german to be polish and too polish to be german. If some poles are gonna be such purists, where do Kashubians fit in?
Softsong  5 | 492  
19 Dec 2008 /  #898
My understanding is that ethnically Kashubians are a West Slavic group. Since they resided in Prussia and Poland, some culturally identified with Germans and others culturally identified with Poles. Those who viewed themselves as German mostly were expelled, or left Poland. Those who were Catholic and viewed themselves as Slavic, stayed.

When I was in Gdańsk in October there were many souvenirs one could buy of Kashubian arts and crafts. I also ate at a Kashubian restaurant that served fish from the lakes of that area.

It looked to me that they were a nice part of Polish society. Their language is very similar to Polish, and with the passage of time seems more like a dialect of Polish.

On the other hand, they have learned to celebrate their uniqueness and special customs within Polish society.
McCoy  27 | 1268  
19 Dec 2008 /  #899
Kashubians have no problem with being Kashubians and Poles at the same time. Silesians are fucked up separatists but thanks God there's only a few of them. There are Lemkos ( Rusyns ), Ukrainians, Belorusians but there's less and less of them cause they are getting Polonized. Old generations are passing away and younger people speak mostly Polish, leaving hometowns and their people, moving to the big cities and mix with Poles. But on the other hand now, when we have one Europe people think that there's good to be different and are more willing to search for their roots. That's what's going on with people with jewish ancestry in Poland.

Their language is very similar to Polish

it's easier to understand czech or slovak than kashubian
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
19 Dec 2008 /  #900
I think it's fair to say many ethnic groups can call themselves polish. It's kind of like the US and Russia.

Archives - 2005-2009 / News / What did Poland get out of the wars and struggles for others?Archived