PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / News  % width1108

What did Poland get out of the wars and struggles for others?


Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #421
Within a few weeks where where they?

Where would you like them to have come from? An amphibious assault on Danzig perhaps? How was Britain supposed to get troops to Poland a few weeks after war was declared? Do remember that the last of your troops in Poland surrendered within five weeks of the declaration of war.

Is it a fitting memorial to have public squabbles based upon half truths, perception and general intransigence.

Here is a photo of what Poland considers to be a fitting memorial to foreigners who died in Poland fighting against the German army:
galeria.lidzbark.com/details.php?image_id=36&mode=search
szarlotka  8 | 2205  
5 Dec 2008 /  #422
The declaration of war is an intent. It may not be feasible to mobilise quickly. If Britain had somehow mysteriously managed to get troops into Poland we would have bene looking for a Polish Dunkirk in days. At that time the German Forces were the strongest and best equipped in Europe. They were using tactics never seen before. In short they were a formidable fighting force that even the Americans would have struggled against - at that time.

Ah America. Weren't they at Yalta too?
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #423
Harry, what am I??? A military genius Patton-like General???? I am not the one threatening war here. Common sense says if you threaten to declare war on someone you should have a back-up plan, non? In case you may actually have to make good on that threat?????

You are the one who is b!tching about how Britain did nothing. Perhaps the reason that Britain did little more than declaring war is because there was little more than declaring war that Britain could have done? Perhaps that's the case. Seeing as how neither you nor anybody else is able to say exactly what Britain should have done, it's pretty clear that there was nothing else Britain could have done.

I love how you are now complaining that Britain declared war on Germany. Obviously in your eyes Britain shouldn't have done that. I'm inclined to agree.
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #424
Where would you like them to have come from? An amphibious assault on Danzig perhaps? How was Britain supposed to get troops to Poland a few weeks after war was declared? Do remember that the last of your troops in Poland surrendered within five weeks of the declaration of war.

You would have had to march through Germany, of course!!! You were the one that declared war. It means marching through Germany. How else is it going to happen????

It's true, threatening to declare war and then actually declaring it means you will have to march through the country you have declared it on. It's common sense!! That's part of the deal.
osiol  55 | 3921  
5 Dec 2008 /  #425
Was it Harry who declared war? I'm going to have to tear a few pages out of a few history books now.

HatefulBunch397

Ronseal poster.

I really am going to attempt to leave this thread now.
szarlotka  8 | 2205  
5 Dec 2008 /  #426
I really am going to attempt to leave this thread now.

A wise tactical withdrawal. I'm right behind you.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #427
You would have had to march through Germany, of course!!! You were the one that declared war. It means marching through Germany. How else is it going to happen????

England??? 1939??? Marching through Germany??? Erm...do you think they would have been successful?
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #428
They would have had to try or their threat would have been totally bogus and empty. Which it was, anyway, for many years.
celinski  31 | 1258  
5 Dec 2008 /  #429
I love how you are now complaining that Britain declared war on Germany. Obviously in your eyes Britain shouldn't have done that. I'm inclined to agree.

They could have started by telling the truth? Orders were given to go to Poland and stall them, bs them into thinking were coming. This seems to have set how the forth largest ally in WW2 would be treated.
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #430
Orders were given to go to Poland and stall them, bs them into thinking were coming.

Oh look! Another foul lie from everybody's favourite Yank. Keep this form up Carol and Poland will doubtless give you an honourary passport (so you can keep the American one which identifies the real you).

You would have had to march through Germany, of course!!!

And where should we have started that march exactly?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #431
This seems to have set how the forth largest ally in WW2 would be treated.

Do you have some numbers for me?
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #432
And where should we have started that march exactly?

You would have gone through the Netherlands, to Hannover, Germany, than onward to Berlin. I am sure you would have had to capture Hamburg, too.

Britian didn't do anything only because they feared the public humiliation and ridicule of a possible defeat against Germany so they didn't even attempt.
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #433
You would have gone through the Netherlands, to Hannover, Germany, than onward to Berlin

And the Dutch were going to let us do that were they?

Try to remember that your own armed forces were already running away from the Germans in August 1939....
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #434
Try to remember that your own armed forces were already running away from the Germans in August 1939....

The US didn't declare war until the bombing of battle ships in Pearl Harbor and that was by the Japanese.

If the Dutch said no, you could have asked Belgium, I am sure they would have said yes!
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #435
Britian didn't do anything only because they feared the public humiliation and ridicule of a possible defeat against Germany so they didn't even attempt.

Not "Britain didn't do anything because assaulting German sea defences would have been suicide and a complete waste of the limited forces Britain did have" ?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #436
You would have gone through the Netherlands, to Hannover, Germany, than onward to Berlin. I am sure you would have had to capture Hamburg, too.

Britian didn't do anything only because they feared the public humiliation and ridicule of a possible defeat against Germany so they didn't even attempt.

Hmmm....saving one's soldiers to fight another day, with a better chance of winning, is more like it...
szarlotka  8 | 2205  
5 Dec 2008 /  #437
Britian didn't do anything only because they feared the public humiliation and ridicule of a possible defeat against Germany so they didn't even attempt.

an attempt to take on Germany at that point in time would have resulted in more than a loss of face. The casulties would have been horrendous and the defeat absolute. I guess you didn't major in military strategy?
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #438
The US didn't declare war until the bombing of battle ships in Pearl Harbor and that was by the Japanese.

I mean the Polish forces who were running away from the Nazis in August 1939.

Why did the USA declare war on Germany?

I guess you didn't major in military strategy?

That's Poles for you.
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #439
an attempt to take on Germany at that point in time would have resulted in more than a loss of face. The casulties would have been horrendous and the defeat absolute. I guess you didn't major in military strategy?

Sadly, that's part of war. That's the reality. Should Britian have taken on a responsibility they couldn't handle, ie: the declaration of war on Germany? Probably not. Without a concise plan, history has pointed the finger at Britian for declaring and not rendering.

Harry you are just bashing poles here after their country was heartlessly invaded. Nazis wanted to take every single pole, no matter what ethnicity, and put them in the gulag style KZ. How can you be so heartless?
celinski  31 | 1258  
5 Dec 2008 /  #440
Do you have some numbers for me?

I thought you didn't want me to link you to death? Well this one is good,

euronet.nl/users/wilfried/ww2/1939.htm

Oh look! Another foul lie from everybody's favourite Yank

I gave you the link the other day with all the meeting that took place, you'll have to go get them by pressing back.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #441
Without a concise plan history has pointed the finger at Britian for declaring and not rendering.

Again...it should have been clear for Warschau too! WHAT DID THEY EXPECT???
szarlotka  8 | 2205  
5 Dec 2008 /  #442
That's Poles for you.

No that's anybody with an axe to grind. The best discussion on this topic I've ever had, a real debate with fact, conclusions etc was actually with a Polish guy who was slightly better informed
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
5 Dec 2008 /  #443
It's the same old theme since nineteen-thirty nine.
In your head, in your head they're still fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are dying...

oh, sorry wrong thread.....
Harry  
5 Dec 2008 /  #444
Without a concise plan history has pointed the finger at Britian for declaring and not rendering.

No, not history, Poles have pointed the finger at Britain. The rest of the world (and history) have taken this as another example of how Poles generally deserve what they get.

I love how Poles criticise Britain for not doing enough and then in the next breath say how Britain shouldn't have declared war on Germany.
osiol  55 | 3921  
5 Dec 2008 /  #445
history has pointed the finger at Britian

More accurately: you have pointed your finger. Now please go and find some logic while I go and pour myself a large drink.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #446
I thought you didn't want me to link you to death? Well this one is good,

URL

Not to sidelongs essays by some unknown bloggers, but I LOVE stats and facts! :)
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #447
No, not history, Poles have pointed the finger at Britain. The rest of the world (and history) have taken this as another example of how Poles generally deserve what they get.

I think that's a heartless point of view considering the circumstances.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #448
Na ja....on the other hand you openly demanded the sacrifice of uncounted british soldiers during their hypothetical march through Germany...which would amount to suicide actually and wouldn't help you one bit I fear.

It might may you feel better but these soldiers, these armies would be sorely missed later.

GB should have made clear that this guarantee can't contain extraordinary military help - but Poland should have known that by pure logic too!
HatefulBunch397  - | 658  
5 Dec 2008 /  #449
Na ja....on the other hand you openly demanded the sacrifice of uncounted british soldiers during their march through Germany...which would mount to suicide actually and wouldn't help you one bit I fear.
It might may you feel better but these soldiers, these armies would be sorely missed later.

Because Britian said they would go to war if Germany invaded Poland...

verstehen Sie????
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11803  
5 Dec 2008 /  #450
verstehen Sie????

Some pages back I actually offered my belief that this declaration of alliance (France's too) was more like a bluff against Hitler.

GB+France+Poland = He surely wouldn't dare!

...well...bummer...he was a fanatic!

Archives - 2005-2009 / News / What did Poland get out of the wars and struggles for others?Archived