Who said about credibility?
Would you rant over and over about credibility or perhaps make some comment on the topic?
With respect I don't consider I am ranting, over and over about credibility. If it's not important to you that is your prerogative; however credibility it is important to me.
A source I would consider credible? Any particular subject?
Here is one example that should suffice which you can either take or leave: American Soldier
by General Tommy Frank; his memoir account of as commander of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the early period war on terror in Afghanistan has for me greater credibility than some 'reporters' opinion on same subject.
The question is how would you react if such article would be written by some Brussels propagandist?
The same if I felt the source appeared to lack credibilty, in my view.
Global Research claims it is offers alternative and independent research however this doesn't appear to be the case as the majority of articles seem very much biased pro-Russian propaganda. That is my view and you will have yours. I have nothing more to add.
Canandian Jew named Michel Chussodovsky,
Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.
and the moon landings were a hoax also ;-)