I have stated these information through valid information taken from 'Readers Digest' magazine
Sorry it's taken me so long to get back, but i've had things to do. Anyway, while i'm not disputing your information, you gotta admit Reader's Digest isn't really a definitive source, nor is it impartial. It's just one publication.
I have seen documentaries about how students from 3rd world countries (specially india and china) do better in education in USA and the other western nations
You'll get no argument from me on what you've seen in documentaries but again you've failed to take into account the scope of what I am questioning here. Large scale immigration isn't only from India and China, it's from Nigeria, from Vietnam, from Somalia, Congo, Romania, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Iraq and from Poland. What did your documentary say about students from all of those countries? And before you answer I'm well aware of the high standards of Polish students so gimme what your documentary stated about the other countries.
Just see the French football team...
You're being ironic right?
If anything that would be a strong case of indigenous workers losing out in favour of immigrant labour. Yes it is a better performing team, I'm not arguing against that (and for the record i couldn't give a rat's about footballers) but the discussion had been centered on the wheres and whys of dissatisfaction in host countries. So now France has a bunch of unemployed indigenous footballers with no market to use their skills and at present are on public assistance. How does that benefit the host nation again?
ts like, they bring diverse intelligence.. gives a country alot of power and variety of thinking dimentions. If you think about it deeply yourself, it will not be difficult to see the point.
I suggest you think about it a little more but from a different perspective.
You seem to be suggesting that immigration of the kind we'd been discussing doesn't bring any negatives along with it. Yet so many people seem to be suggesting there are negative effects, I guess they're just wrong or haven't seen your documentaries or read that article you did.
Let's see the comparison between how much only immigrants from 3rd world and developing economies bring into a given country in terms of the economy (filling labour shortages, increasing the local standard of living, helping to improve the infrastructure, contributions to education, science and technology) vs. the costs they bring with public assistance, legal issues, displacing local workers (more public assistance) plus language and skills training. So you might have a point but my hunch is that you don't.
That I dont think can actually work.
That's your opinion and I can't really agree or disagree unless i know what you're basing it on. Maybe in the long run they can't but don't tell them that.