Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Posts by Gunslinger44  

Joined: 29 Oct 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 14 Nov 2009
Threads: -
Posts: Total: 34 / In This Archive: 34
From: USA, Pittsburgh, PA
Speaks Polish?: Some
Interests: Travel, international business

Displayed posts: 34 / page 1 of 2
sort: Latest first   Oldest first
Gunslinger44   
14 Nov 2009
Love / Do not marry Polish woman [212]

What is wrong with experience?

"Experience" in this case means that many other men have inserted themselves inside her. I am not so stupid or judgemental as to expect or think that all women who get married are virgins, but if they make an ongoing thing of sleeping with many different men, then that there is a big, big problem.

Seriously, "experience"? Do you know how easy it is to teach a woman things like that? In all reality, the enjoyability of the experience (for both of them) is mostly reliant upon the man. And judging by what women tell me on this subject, men basically are not very good at sex. Done in 5 minutes? That's barely enough time to get started. So all this "experience" these women you speak of, boils down to the reality that they were simply used as an outlet of sexual urges by lots of other men. This in no way increases their value, in fact quite the opposite.

I am against sex before marriage, however I have made some mistakes, and I deeply regret them. Sex is something far too powerful, far too wonderful to be trifled with amongst those without any serious intentions.

Why is the polish blonde who keeps four secret lovers better?

She's not. She is worse.
Gunslinger44   
14 Nov 2009
Love / Do not marry Polish woman [212]

Yeah, the Jews have a different view towards sex than many Catholics. They see it as a natural giving of love and don't have the same hang-ups.

You cannot possibly mean religious Jews. Judaism's unbearably repressive view and practice of sexuality makes Islam's practices seem downright open and free.

Southern will be glad as Israeli girls are pretty hot :)

They ARE hot, I'll give you that, but as most of them are,....promiscuous in the extreme, their value to me as a man, is less than nothing. In fact I'd take a Czech over an Israeli. At least the Czech will whine much less. (yes I know all girls can whine, but I am pretty sure Jewish girls invented it)
Gunslinger44   
13 Nov 2009
Love / Do not marry Polish woman [212]

[quote=Gunslinger44]
and I hope to God Almighty that Poland does NOT go the way of America (or, even worse, Czech Republic)

Johncardwell?
What's wrong with CR?Much less sh1t there[/quote]

Who is Johncardwell?

As to Czech,...well lets just say I signed up to Lide.cz to chat with Czech women,...and what they say about Czech women is true. They are extremely promiscuous. I could hardly get to 2 responses from the same girl before it got (VERY) sexual. It is worse than in America. And that, my friend, is very, very bad.

Don't get me wrong, a healthy sexual appetite is a wonderful thing for a woman to have,...but without any discretion it is the worst possible trait.

Of course, if you are looking for cheap, meaningless sex (most "men" are anyway) then Czech is probably the perfect place for you. That is, if you don't mind the fact that most any girl you find there, is likely to have had 15 or more other men take a ride before you got to her.
Gunslinger44   
13 Nov 2009
Love / Do not marry Polish woman [212]

This is some wisdom here. The true quality women want a GOOD MAN, who is secure and confident. Just like quality men want a beautiful, healthy, gentle and caring woman who is "blessed" physically with nice proportions. Why? Because we want a woman who is fertile, will conceive our children, and nurture them, physically (breasts) and spiritually (heart).

If anyone here is thinking that the human species has evolved past our created design, that person is delusional. These are timeless concepts, and quite easy to grasp. People who try to "change the rules" on either end, will always end up unhappy. So quit living in denial, get with the program and start working on making YOURSELF a more attractive potential mate. I don't mean plastic surgery. Try getting off your butt and exercising, lifting weights, running, maybe enroll in some dance classes, martial arts. As for the money thing? No matter what you are good at, there is a way to make a lot of money doing it. Find that way.

And another note: Just BE a MAN! Don't whine, cry, whimper, suck up, etc. The modern world is so short-changed on men nowadays,...a man with working testes is like striking platinum ore.

a happy woman is a pregnant one with lots of sex and no bills to pay, i always say. can you provide this? ask yourself the question. if not, no, the quality women won't want you. their instincts won't allow them. tough. but important to remember: it is biology, and Nature - not the fault of women. we just obey our hormones like everybody else.

What the men here should FIRST ask themselves, is "Am I sexually attracted to a woman with narrow hips, flat chest, and strange facial features?" And in the same way, a woman is repulsed (generally) by a man with no apparent physical strength, no confidence, and little money. All those things are important for the security of her and the children she will bear.

there are always desperate ones, though. or drunk ones. or ones on the pill (and therefore obeying pigs' or mares' hormones). you might get lucky.

Interesting about the "pill". A woman who has cast aside her femininity for immediate sexual gratification is not acting upon natural instinct entirely, and is why many American women will "date" the most slovenly, trashy, jobless scumbags you have ever seen. Maybe it's the "pig" hormones? ;)

Though even such women admit that they DO want (at least eventually) a family, etc. And even the most pig-like among them show a vestige of their natural woman (being selective about what kind of trash they sleep with, sometimes) it is quite a sad state of affairs,...and I hope to God Almighty that Poland does NOT go the way of America (or, even worse, Czech Republic)
Gunslinger44   
11 Nov 2009
Love / Personal issues with two women, they want to be my friend - a Polish thing? [49]

Albanaich,

Wow.

Like RevokeNice said, shall we draw you a map?

Listen, girls don't randomly call guys up and say things like "I miss you" unless they WANT TO BE PHYSICALLY INTIMATE!

I cannot believe you are 55 years old and you need us to explain this to you. (I am not insulting you, I am just incredulous)

From all you've told, you're obviously doing everything "right" with the girls, and whether or not you were TRYING to attract them sexually is regardless of the fact that you HAVE done so!

They want you to be their "always and forever". If you cannot deliver, then resist any urges you might have, because everyone will end up badly hurt. But if you think you might want to date them then DO IT and quit asking about it on an online forum where you're more likely to get responses from guys who don't know sh*t about women, besides what their mommy told them.

People don't realize,...just how desperate the world of women is for real men.
Gunslinger44   
6 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

You are ducking again, Gunslinger. I asked you about the different stages characterising different growth phases. Why the need for those different labels when you could just say unborn child and then, after it emerges, is born? There are state changes and very material ones included within.

I am ducking nothing. Of course there are many stages of growth human persons go through. Not sure what you even mean by any of this.

Wow, blanket statements here. It is homo sapiens but a chimpanzee is almost homo sa...*snip*!

Now see, what you just did there is compare a monkey with a human being. You are discredited from any further discussion. You are an idiot.

Profitting doesn't form a large part of my thinking on the matter. Yes, there are ulterior motives just like on 9/11 but prove them.

Prove them?

"In April, the annual report of Planned Parenthood Federation of America revealed that the abortion giant had a total income of $1.02 billion—with reported profits of nearly $115 million. Taxpayers kick in more than $336 million worth of government grants and contracts at both the state and federal levels. That’s a third of Planned Parenthood’s budget.

And what market-distorting results do we get for those government incentives? 289,650 abortions in 2006."


Planned Parenthood is America's largest abortion provider, and is a "non-profit" organization.

Even the most simple concepts you cannot understand. You have either an underdeveloped brain, learned stupidity, or feigned stupidity. In any case, this is my last response to anything of yours, I cannot waste time debating with imbeciles.

You called my arguments silly and foolish so I question just how much you take them seriously. You claim to understand their pain but can't follow through when under profound distress through rape.

Because they ARE. Understanding reasons why someone might be inclined toward wrong actions, does not make them free to commit wrong actions.

Can't we call a spade a spade and murder, murder? Ignorance, no, you haven't answered this at all. I looked above and saw nothing. Please elaborate. You label it sth but won't punish it or qualify it. Pff....

It's the killing of a human child inside its mother. The mothers are told its "just a blob". Using common sense, this tells me that the mothers, by and large (and from much verbal contact with such) are unaware they are killing a human child.

Anyone with a brain can understand that this complicates things heavily as to the culpability of the mothers. No surprise that you cannot.

That book was way back in 1945 when abortion was illegal and times have moved on since then. The forward movement led to subsequent research by pro-LIFERS. There isn't a consensus anymore of 10 weeks but 23 weeks. I keep telling you this.

I told you, HEARTBEAT AT 3 WEEKS, REGULAR BRAINWAVES AT 6-8 WEEKS! And you cannot PROVE lack of sentience. What we CAN prove is that a baby, FROM conception, is LIVING, GROWING, HOMO SAPIENS! A HUMAN BEING!

SO it has human characteristics but you are completely ignoring the totality of the person concept. You narrow it down to your own perception which doesn't fully embrace other material factors. Address this please.

"Human characteristics"!? "Human CHARACTERISTICS!"!??? No, SCIENTIFICALLY, FACTUALLY, IT IS A NEW HUMAN BEING BABY INSIDE THE MOTHER, FROM THE POINT OF CONCEPTION! With a determined SEX, a determined HAIR COLOR, EYE COLOR, etc!

You continue to IGNORE Scientific fact concerning when human life begins. As stated because of your multiple refusals to acknowldge such, and your continuous illogical and even downright retarded behaviors,....I cannot and will not waste further time discussing this issue with you.

Stop ducking the meaty issues by blanket assertions. Your scientific focus is limited.

Wrong. My Scientific focus is right on point: The humanity of the child. Is the "being" in question of the order "Homo Sapiens"? YES! Is the "being" in question currently living? YES!

Smack-down. Now you get to shut the f*ck up.
Gunslinger44   
6 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

1) DNA guides from conception, ok. But guides to what and from what?!!

Oh spare me the "I'm stupid" act! Guides the NEWLY CREATED PERSON into a FULLY GROWN PERSON! Are you THIS dull, truly? The fact you would even ASK something like this either means you are making me have to repeat the basest of biology lessons to you for sport, or that you are so stupid you actually never understood them to begin with!

I think there needs to be a compromise here, right now. I unequivocally state that there is a guiding process to ultimate formation and delivery but the very fact that we name four different stages shows that there are meaningful phases changes. Like it or not, GS, definitions come into play and can catch us out. Murder as malice aforethought :) Zygote-Embryo-Foetus-Birth.

It is scientific fact that it IS a unique and GROWING HUMAN BEING INDIVIDUAL PERSON, FROM THE POINT OF CONEPTION! Viability and sentience are about as pertinent to this argument as the ability to survive on one's own, and consciousness are to a person OUTSIDE the womb! In other words, THEY'RE NOT! Now, I say it yet again, A NEW HUMAN PERSON IS CONCEIVED AT CONCEPTION!!! That is a fact. No one can dispute it.

2) That is a hard question for sure, GS. We must, on such occasions, stick with facts as best we can. It all goes back to personhood.

Not at all a hard question. The person to believe, in matters of right and wrong, is the person with nothing to gain, and demonstrable loss. It proves sincerity. Someone profiting from something, has demonstrable ulterior motives, and is suspect. Wow. I cannot believe that I just had to explain this to you.

Yes, it does all go back to the facts, and you continue to ignore them.

3) Not true at all. You ignored the physical element where the woman had to carry an unborn child of rape, you ignored the various costs of raising the kid (what if she was from a lower-class background?) and you also ignored the pain of childbirth which they may not want to go through when the baby is not from their hubby's sperm. I know what science says and I agree that the DNA is there at conception.

I "ignored" nothing, you liar. I fully acknowledge the pain, suffering of the women involved, and I feel for them,...as much as I can without actually BEING them. The fact is a NEW HUMAN LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION. You continue to call upon human suffering, circumstances, celebrity opinion, or whatever the hell else, I will continue to strike it down as immaterial to this debate. One could make any number of such cases against children living OUTside the womb.

However, none of this AT ALL changes the humanity and personhood of the child inside her. And that is the main issue. So keep on track, little soldier.

4) Let's wheel out figures then. Many contend that more people sought abortions when it was illegal. Before we get into that, you ducked the ONE question I wanted you to answer. If abortion is indeed murder, then why aren't you for the administering of the standard punishment for murder? What penalty would you give to doctors who carry out abortions if you were a lawmaker? What about the woman?

Yes lets wheel out figures. I presented mine. Where the f*ck are yours?

The reason I am NOT for the standard punishments for murder is because of the lies and deceptions, the ignorance surrounding the whole issue. I said this before, but you were not listening.

5) GS, it's a general consensus that sentience begins at 23 weeks.

Bullsh*t. abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_l ove_them_both_14.asp

"We state categorically that no finding of modern fetology invalidates the remarkable conclusion drawn after a lifetime of research by the late Professor Arnold Gesell of Yale University. In The Embryology of Behavior: The Beginnings of the Human Mind (1945, Harper Bros.), Dr. Gesell wrote, "and so by the close of the first trimester the fetus is a sentient, moving being. We need not speculate as to the nature of his psychic attributes, but we may assert that the organization of his psychosomatic self is well under way." "

The same logic drives the pro-choice argument about the fetus and abortion. If the fetus is not yet a person, abortion cannot harm the future person it will never become. The fact that the fetus has the natural inevitability of becoming a person, whereas a sperm does not, is a separate issue that we shall explore in a moment. But the basic point remains: potentiality is not personhood'.

I have bolded the flawed portion. From the point of conception, it IS a person, boy or girl, IT IS A PERSON, BLUE EYES OR GREEN EYES, IT IS A PERSON, BLONDE OR BRUNETTE, IT IS A PERSON, BLACK, WHITE, BROWN OR MULATTO! Science fully upholds this as empirical fact. NOT "POTENTIAL" FACT! Address this please.

6) I tell you what, I'm fed up with you ignoring the links I post. I found at least 5 websites to support my contention that many illegal abortions took place every year in America. I will post them after some time but I want YOU to try and see my side, as an anti-abortionist after all (with exceptions). If you can see where I am coming from, I will take this further. If not, it's futile!

Yes, I'm sure many illegal abortions DID occur before 1973. But you lament the "thousands who died and were disfigured" without citing a single source. Yes, I see where you are coming from, and I'M telling YOU, that it is a FALSE POSITION!

7) Why would the kid be ridiculed if everyone knew and told, GS? It's a life under God, isn't it?

Because kids can be cruel, I'm sure you know this.

NO, it is NOT back to "quality of life" it NEVER WAS about "quality of life"! It always WAS and always WILL BE about when NEW HUMAN LIFE BEGINS! The fact that many people grow up to be and do evil things, or to experience profound emotional and physical pain GIVES NO ONE THE RIGHT TO SAY THEY ARE FORFEIT OF THE RIGHT TO LIVE, AT ANY POINT!

Humanity strikes me as a concept of spirituality and philosophy.

What has a newborn experienced? How do you know it remembers anything? It only cries, eats, sleeps, and craps its shorts. Why not kill a newborn?

I could pound you with much tougher points, GS, but I'll let you out of jail...

Bullsh*t. You have nothing.

... by saying that we need to give most unborns the chance to find their own manifest path.

Yes, and we do this by LETTING THE CHILD LIVE!

Ah, let me shoot you down before you get ahead of yourself. She chose to be raped, yes or no? If you say yes then it's not a rape. It's forced penile penetration without her express and willing consent (Stallard defines it differently but ho hum).

Blah blah blah. Yet again Seanus, you think you will sway me away from the core issue, the child's humanity. It is a human being, regardless of ANY hardship imposed on him/her, or any of him/her surrounding people. Hardships in life may come. Always. None of them excuse wrong actions on our part.

I'll let others judge on how I've done in responding to you. I won't proclaim to have cut you down or call you jello or detract from the sanctity of life as an anti-abortionist. I'll just say that women, as ACTUAL tangible humans capable of making choices (can your embryo do this?) should be heard as those vested with rights. I care not for the dilution of rights!

I said your arguments are worthless, I cut THEM down with the sword. You claim to be "anti abortion" and "Christian" yet you continue in all arguments, as neither, and in your words you condone the behavior of the abortion industry.

One human's rights END where another another human's rights begin! That would be at conception, for those SCIENTIFICALLY and BIBLICALLY MINDED! Those who reject Science and God, their opinions are baseless, worthless.

I will say once again that we need to, um, in the words of Ezekiel 25:17 (Pulp Fiction), 'shepherd the weak through the valley of darkness'.

Ah, but "give the woman her choice" in this case means "let a child be killed by a sharp instrument, or by chemical attack". This I cannot countenance. And neither should you.
Gunslinger44   
5 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Seanus

The hardware is the body/brain (the physical component) and the software is the genetic program (DNA from conception).

This argument is not at all pertinent or valid. Why? The DNA is present in the beginning, guiding the GROWING BODY from the point of conception. To equate this to computers, you would need a "hardware" that's own pre-imbedded SOFTWARE was causing it to grow and expand in size constantly. There is no such thing.

And who are YOU to say that a fertilized egg is not sentient? How do you know it is not? At that point it IS a boy or girl, it already is decided the hair color, eye color, etc. The only true method to determine sentience in a pre-born baby is to actually BE the baby. But we also have facts, aside from the presence of all the DNA at conception, the HEARTBEAT AT 3 WEEKS, REGULAR BRAINWAVES AT 6-8 WEEKS. Like I said, only memories I really can remember at 5 years old and up. I guess before then I was not "sentient" eh?

And as for AI being "sentience" ie the Data (from Star Trek) example, AI can only have as much intelligence as a human has imparted into it. Even computer programs for "random" selection, are not truly random, and follow a PRE-PROGRAMMED logic. Programmed by,.....HUMANS!

Here's a FACT for you: at 8 weeks old, the baby will open its mouth, and jerk AWAY from pain-causing instruments. And THAT is only a demonstration that WE, being OUTSIDE THE WOMB, can perceive. Hmmm.

In summation, I DON'T WANT TO EVER HEAR YOUR LYING, BASELESS, FACTLESS "ARGUMENTS" ABOUT SENTIENCE, EVER! YOU CANNOT PROVE SENTIENCE DOES NOT BEGIN AT CONCEPTION, AND SCIENCE CONTINUES TO SHOW AWARENESS AT A LOWER AND LOWER AGE IN THE PREBORN CHILD!

Clear enough for you?

Where's my guarantee that they weren't paid off to serve an agenda?

It likely is the only one of its kind. The "choicers" are not at all concerned with such things, but only in espousing emotionalism of rape in general to further their PROFITEERING from the death of the unborn. Would you believe A) a group of people who support rights of pre-born babies, and are demonstrably willing to support all children, in word and in deed, emotionally and financially, regardless of the damage to their own pocketbook, or B) a group of people who rake in loads of CASH from the deaths of the pre-born in question?

Seems like a hard question to me,...

You don't want to treat it as a physical, social or physiological issue at all.

Oh I absolutely do. As a matter of fact, I have always brought religion as last in all my arguments. I have always called upon science and reason, (both creations of God) firstly. Read them, and tell me that is not true, I DARE YOU!

In the future, please do not BLATANTLY LIE like this again.

The stark and bleak reality of non-medical procedures is a damn sight worse than doing it with a professional hand.

The wicked will do what the wicked will do. But their evil deeds should be illegal to make them fearful, and so they can be rightly punished when they are caught carrying out their evil plans. Same as with any other form of murder.

But none of this changes the FACT that abortion rates climbed THROUGH THE ROOF when abortion was made legal, and the public was LIED TO by those who profit from it! But please, continue to tell me more lies.

And the Heroin junky is far more likely to die of AIDS from an infected needle, than if Heroin use was made legal. We should legalize and publicly subsidize his destructive behavior, like we do abortion?

How about the viability threshold being 23 weeks, coinciding with sentience?

No. 23 weeks doesn't mean ****. Immediate sentience not only does NOT prove non-personhood, but your "sentience begins 23 weeks" argument is a flat out LIE. But please, continue to bring it up time and time again. I know it makes you feel special, like you had ground to stand on. But don't look down,...you might realize that it's only a piece of drifwood,...and it's crumbling faster,...and faster....

In America, before abortion was legal, thousands died and many were disformed through the fact that about 800,000 abortions per year were sought illegally.

Where did you get your statistics, please? CDC tells me that in 1990, legal abortions rate had climbed to nearly 1.5 Million. So even IF we take your statistics (how do you compile statistics for something that is illegal, and if so where did the study come from, who performed the study?) then abortion STILL showed an increase by almost 100% from '73 to 1990.

But again, where are the statistics? And who are these thousands of women dead and deformed from illegal abortions? (and why should we feel bad that they died from seeking something that was widely accepted as murder?)

Please address these point immediately.

The kid itself will be ridiculed and feel dreadful, maybe even be driven to suicide.

How do YOU know she wouldn't see it as hers? Sure, the kid would be ridiculed IF EVERYONE KNEW AND TOLD! But kids are ridiculed all the time for things they have no control over. Doesn't TOUCH the fact they are HUMAN BEINGS and worthy of being defended!

So please, by all means, provide me with some research to demonstrate the horrible quality of life these children of rape endure. You won't. But even if you did, it wouldn't change the FACT of their humanity, which is the CORE of this debate.

It violates her privacy, having a child born of rape.

The rape violated her privacy, yes. The abortion would FURTHER invade her privacy, her womanhood, her emotional well-being, and the CHILD'S LIFE!

There. All your puny,wretched "arguments". All of them cut down by the sword and strewn across the battlefield like the refuse that they are. But please, send more.
Gunslinger44   
5 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

#296
Typical Gunslinger, pick the argument as polar opposite to his as possible and lay into it.

Not in the least. I didn't get into this for the "fun" of it (though it can be satisfying making murder-supporters look the fools that they are) I address points as they surface, though most of them are manure, straight from the horse's ass.

I have a f*cking life and a job to do, you're the one who keeps inviting me back to your thrice-resurrected, dead and rotting "arguments".

I've discovered new lines in 278, 280, 282 and 292 that will put him to the sword.

Bullsh*t. If you have, you would have told which ones. You're talking a big talk to make it seem as though your argument can hold a pint of water. It never has, and it won't ever. But if you insist, I will look at these posts and address, yet again, whatever it is you are talking about. I feel like a father whose bratty kids keep wanting to ride the merry-go-round over and over, but he's sick to his stomach.

How, GS, do you get round the fact that a religious body in the Church of England rightly morally condemns standard abortions (although I wouldn't adopt this is an absolute cut+dry position but a nice general one) but recognises 3 exceptions? (one being rape)

Are you speaking of the Episcopalian "church"? Doesn't matter which, I don't agree. The "church" is not infallible, and if they are too coward to call murder murder, then their opinion of the subject is anti-Biblical, anti-Science, doesn't mean crud:

"For you created my inmost being;
you knit me together in my mother's womb.

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
your works are wonderful,
I know that full well.

My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret place.
When I was woven together in the depths of the earth,

your eyes saw my unformed body.
All the days ordained for me
were written in your book
before one of them came to be." Psalm 139:13-16

Gunslinger44   
5 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

You just disqualified yourself as credible discussion partner. I will no longer blah blah blah blah,...*back into corner like the coward he is*

Why, because I called you names? Plenty more where that came from, and all true!

Nice cop-out. But I'll ask the question AGAIN, just to FURTHER demonstrate to anyone reading this that you REFUSE to answer the question based on the fact that it is devastating to your frail NON-logical "argument". I didn't ASK you about the EGG, I didn't ask you about the WOMB! I asked you WHAT PART OF THE WOMAN'S BODY IS THE FETUS! ???

Answer it.

GOD IS A CREATION OF MAN HIMSELF TO BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN WHAT HE COULDN'T EXPLAIN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST.

Says the simpering little effeminate with no back-bone. It's only because real men from other countries took a stand and went to battle against oppression and tyranny, that YOUR parents or grandparents were not killed with the millions of Jews slain in the Nazi holocaust. And there you sit, dishonoring every single one of them. You yourself are PROOF that natural selection is a lie. In a world of "survival of the fittest", how is a frail, cowardly little swine like yourself, afforded the right to live past a few days?

But, like I said, your opinion goes in the trash with all the other pedophiles, rapists, and murderers. Don't care.

Oh, and here's a quote from your hero:

I feel most deeply that this whole question of Creation is too profound for human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton! Let each man hope and believe what he can. - Charles Darwin

Isn't Science wonderful? There is a new DVD out called The Case for a Creator. But you probably won't look into it, because you are content living in ignorance and rebellion.

Just know this; one day you will die. When you die, your spirit will be taken to the Judgement Seat of Jesus Christ, and you will stand before the Mighty One of Israel, whom you have scorned. As the worm you are, you will cower in His awesome presence. An angel will open the Book of Life, and the LORD will ask "Is his name found in the Book of Life?" the angel will answer "No, my Lord, his name does not appear." then you will be sent to the Lake of Fire, where you will forever remain in torment, along with all the unrepentant, the rebellious, and the devil and his angels.

"Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books.

I know the Truth, and you have believed a lie. It's quite a gamble you're making, and the house always wins...

It not too late to repent and turn to Jesus even now,...not too late, until that last breath,...can you feel it,...slipping away?
Gunslinger44   
3 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Tell me, if you're so well educated, why was that if religion preaches love and understanding and WANTS TO SAVE HUMAN LIFE?

Like I said. Cowards and weaklings are everywhere, none of that changes the principles of Christianity. The "church" in America is mostly silent and afraid to speak against abortion. And for your information, genius-boy, Hitler's extermination plan was TOP SECRET EVEN AMONG THE UPPER ECHELON SS! Why? Because he knew people would oppose it, and it would destroy German morale.

The Japanese in America were rounded up like animals in much the same way here, only difference is we didn't SECRETLY kill them. Maybe because we had Christian leaders...

And so what if the pope prayed for swift victory over Soviet Russia? Everyone everywhere of all races and religions had better chances of survival under Nazi Germany. Everyone except the Jew, the Gypsy, etc. and as stated, the Church was not aware of the extermination.

Surely you won't mind anybody breaking into your house and certainly not use your gun when he's threatening you, as you "value precious life"?)

You're such a frail little man. Right to keep and bear arms is the people's assurance against tyrannical government. Why not read up on it? Because you don't care and you're a weakling and unable to understand such things as taking a stand against oppression. Ever hear of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising? Imagine if all the Jews in Europe would have been armed as Americans are. The only holocaust would have been the piles of dead Gestapo in the doorways. Yes we own weapons, whole stockpiles of privately owned arms. But to your fearful mind, that must make us violent, right? Don't make me start pulling out per capita murder statistics for US vs UK.

I value life, and if someone threatens my life or the life of any innocent person, that person is going to be attacked. I wouldn't "shoot to kill" I'd just shoot, and if it happens that the violent attacker is killed, then so be it. Perhaps it will put the fear of God in future wannabe thieves and murderers. Here's a news story recently, from 5 minutes from my home: thepittsburghchannel.com/news/21112300/detail.html

So you're basically saying that a woman who gets raped owes it to herself?

Haha! Funny man you are. I'm talking about "choicers" not rape victims. Isn't it "funny' that 75-85% of rape victims who become pregnant by the rape, choose LIFE?

Look into it genius, abortion is dangerous to the woman's LIFE, as well as her reproductive future, and it is deadly to the child inside her. That is the discussion here. Get with the program.

The eggcell is part of the woman's body, the womb is part of her body. She decides what to do with it. Not you.

I didn't ASK you about the EGG, I didn't ask you about the WOMB! I asked you WHAT PART OF THE WOMAN'S BODY IS THE FETUS! ???

I knew you wouldn't answer this one, you slimy piece of filth.

Indeed you have put nothing but obsolete nonsense in here.)

Wrong. You outright LIED and said I was drabbling on about a vengeful God. I never did. So it is you who are full of nonsense.

Whoah, that's quite some heavy language for somebody who claims to be so forgiving and valuing human life and so on. But, halleluyah! Have a look here:)

I have no patience for vermin like you. I am set against people like you, who encourage the decay of our culture from within, promote murder of children still inside their mothers. Don't expect nice language from me, you are scum. Like I said, people like you I lump in with all the other pedophiles, rapists, and murderers.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_Theory

And don't come up with that bullcrap that it's just a theory, so far I have seen lots more practical evidence of it than of the theory you're such an adept of...

You mother and father had sex, and their sperm and egg unites to make you. But who created the sperm? And the egg? Who designed all the sexual organs? Do you have any idea how intricate this stuff really is? How about I pull up next to your house in a brand new BMW, and say "Hey, look at this completely random product of evolution, it was created by unintelligent design and randomly assembled itself from evolving matter."

And THAT's how stupid YOU look. No, more stupid actually. The human body is light years more advanced than a motor vehicle, which takes thousands of INTELLIGENT designers, engineers, and assemblers to complete.

It's just a theory, weak boy, Darwin himself didn't subscribe to it. And a sh*tty one at that. "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." - Charles Darwin

Mmhmm....

2. Using derogatory language is strictly prohibited (unless necessary to explain the language's nuances). Posters who use derogatory language towards other users will be banned.

"you slimy piece of filth" is an example
Gunslinger44   
3 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

1) Gunslinger, I have a postgraduate law degree (LLM) and we have the same statement in court. It is a logistic formality and the judiciary knows that not everyone knows the Bible. You swear to tell the truth and the truth is that they took an option permitted by law. There! Satisfied?

Well then why not swear upon the Talmud? The Koran? For someone knowledgeable about the legal system,...you surely are clueless as to its origins.

2) Hitler was a Catholic, you moron! There are atheists like SeanBM on this forum whom I would place trust in. He is fair and you can see how balanced he is across the forum. He listens and is a moral man, though not a man of God. Just like my father. One of the most moral men I have had the privelege of meeting. He is a nurse teacher (my Dad).

Hitler WAS a Catholic. He was a social Darwinist with no official religion,...although many aspects of Hitler's 3rd Reich point to a Germanic pagan religion. A moral man, good. But "moral" by whose standards? Where do we get "morality" from? Hitler thought it was right and "moral" to murder Jews. Hmmm.

The reason your father is a MORAL man is because he has come from a CHRISTIAN NATION, where CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES are impressed upon the children from youth. At least that is the way it used to be,...but don't worry,...the atheists are quickly changing that,...and we see what direction the Free World is headed.

3) A separate party connected by an umbilical cord? LOL Wow, how independent. You have just made an utter fool of yourself and you know that, right? Harry even dubbed it as a leech/parasite but I cannot countenance that position at all.

Bullsh*t. The umbilical cord is a channel by which the baby is nourished inside mommy. And you know that, right? And how does baby get fed afterwards? BREASTS! then, a SPOON! "Wow. How independent."! Please address this, you blubbering toolbag.

4) Tactics, wow. Getting a taste of your own medicine then, sonny? At least I didn't put words in your mouth. How foul that was!

How about I say "Self-respecting people hate Jews." that would tell everyone what I was really thinking, unquestionably. And it wouldn't matter how furiously I back-pedaled, everyone would know and there would be nothing I could do about it.

You want that children conceived of rape should all be aborted.

5) No, those points were all valid. Most children can reflect on childhood, funny that yours can't. Let's ask a foetus, are you enjoying your childhood? LOL What do you get up to in there? When people reflect back on their childhood, they remember actions. Who remembers being in the stomach? Come on lad, give it up! Oh, and I have 4 words for you, 'I do not remember'. If we ARE us at conception then we'd remember who and what we ARE through memory. You sounded like you were only saying that we are human and that's obvious.

Can a newborn baby reflect on its childhood? No. Guess its not a child then, fit for killing by whomever "decides". Points not valid, as stated.

6) Physically and mentally destructive to who? To gay people as private and consenting adults? It is how they ARE. Do you think most people choose to be gay? My friend fought with it for years, going with girls who he couldn't really feel for. He is not damaged as he accepted what he IS. If you ARE, at conception, born with the gay gene then shouldn't you be afforded protection as you are a child of God? Being rather selective, are we? What did Jesus do with Maria Magdalena, a prozzy? He didn't turn her away, did he? Go on, tell me. What did John Paul the 2nd do to that guy who shot at him? He went to him and went right close to him. The American Association changed it for a reason.

There is no "gay gene". It never existed. It was a THEORY, which even the Scientific "elite" are now abandoning. But please, tell me more oh wise and learned one.

And yes, homosexual people are afforded the protections provided PEOPLE. I think the acts of homosexuality should be illegal and punishable, as they were until most recently. No, not selective at all. Nice try though, you dunce. Keep on ingnoring every point I make while coming up with new brainless schemes every 5 seconds, thinking I'll become so preoccupied with those that I'll forget the main issue.

7) Not knowing the joys of life is an acceptable result of abortion for all the reasons I have outlined. Simply put, that entity was not meant to be (child to be to please you).

So human suffering is reason enough to end life? Then why do you CLAIM to feel bad about the mother offing herself? I suppose that "entity" (another way to say A PERSON) was never meant to be either. The fact that she will never know any more joys in life is an "acceptable result".

8) Go and take it up with the doctors then. I merely said that we have to trust people but that we have to educate ourselves to the hilt like my Mum does before any visit.

On that we can certainly agree.

9) What if she doesn't want to be put through the agony of childbirth? There's a psychological reason for you. What if she is so busy at work through the rat race that she cannot take maternal leave? Social reason. What if she doesn't want the burden of lumping a foetus around with her for months on end? Practical reason. You just love putting women through extra hassle to serve your holier-than-thou agenda!!

Take these silly, foolish little pieces of "argument" of yours, and apply them to ANY PREGNANT WOMAN AT ANY STAGE OF PREGNANCY! They completely ignore the question of HUMAN LIFE, and of the MORALITY of abortion.

Example: Mommy is trying to get a new job,...but there's a problem, she has to take care of little Janey, and that day-care is so costly. Why put her through this "hassle", when she can just take Janey down to the dark man in the alley who can cut her up with a saw, put the pieces into a gabage bag, and throw it away.

"Practical" and "social" reasons! But I suppose, with you, where human life is concerned, "any excuse will do".

10) And the scientific community is very divided. That shoots you down in flames in a oner. Heard of medical science? There is a procedure there called abortion that has been developed ;) ;)

Ahh, but there are certain undeniable things upon which they all HAVE TO agree, due to overwhelming empirical evidence. Among those is A NEW HUMAN PERSON BEGINS WHEN THE SPERM MEETS THE EGG, ie AT CONCEPTION! So sorry, not a bullet struck, and I am looping to come up behind you and fire another heat-seeker at your fragile Sopwith.

11) That's temporary non-sentience, mudslinger. They still revert to becoming a fully functional member of society thereafter. We still possess sentience, it is just 'switched off' at that moment as we biologically need to sleep. The zygote and embryo don't have this sentience. It comes further into the foetal stage.

AHA!!! So you admit that human beings in a state of "temporary non-sentience" are not inhuman becuase of it. "Temporary" 1. lasting, existing, serving, or effective for a time only; not permanent: a temporary need; a temporary job. Would you say then,...that a baby inside the womb's "non-sentience" would be "temporary"? Oh wait, you would HAVE TO!! I am grinning so smirkily right now. Now I've got you nailed to the wall, you slimy piece of green Jell-O.

Here, 'Truth is, it's all about WHEN the baby becomes a sentient human being. That is, in my view, the ONLY discussion on the abortion issue that has any merit. If the baby is truly not alive until the baby is born, then "Pro Choice" groups are correct. If the baby is alive before birth, then the "Pro Life" groups are correct.'

What, first you say "sentience",...then you say "If the baby is alive"...? Wouldn't a HEART-BEAT from a HUMAN HEART have something to do with being ALIVE? Because that begins 3 weeks after conception. So is it, "sentiency" or being "alive" that constitute what it means to be a human person? I think you are confusing yourself.

I agree, it's centrally relevant you moron! Sentience is at 23 weeks generally. Without sentience, what is an entity? It's a developing child but isn't yet a human being without sentience, sorry.

Yes, it IS a human being. FROM THE POINT OF CONCEPTION IT IS HOMO SAPIENS AND NO OTHER!

I cannot continue such a discussion with someone who refuses to acknowledge Scientific facts proven long ago. Go back to High School and re-learn this.

12) Aha, "will be sentient" but isn't yet? That's all I needed to know, thanks. It hasn't reached sentience so, IMHO, as an embryo born of rape, it can be aborted as it hasn't reached personhood. No sentience, no personhood. Generally, though, I think that it shouldn't be aborted as it needs to be allowed to reach sentience. God made it that way that it had to move through phases to get there but rape is a special case and I stand by that. I am generally anti-abortion as I have said before. It is a window through which action, though regrettable, can be taken.

Sentiency, as has been proven, is not what constitutes personhood. Same as: walking, talking, hearing, speaking, independent survival, color, gender, height, weight, age, mental capacity. None of those are central as to what constitutes a "person". Now, you were saying?

13) Sentience is not all I have. I have outlined all manner of other material factors above and you know it. It's all there should you care to look (though you won't).

I have looked and I responded to all of your garbage you threw my way, though regrettably, as it has been such a waste of my time.

It's like a lion, chasing a chimp through an office building,....and the chimp just keeps climbing higher and higher,...throwing chairs and tables in the way in terror,...not able to realize that once he reaches the top floor he will be cornered, and not able to withstand the lion.

14) People do take a stand against murder and that's why murderers go to prison for 25 years. Duh! Not very perceptive today, GS.

Sometimes it takes "people" in general longer to come around, as will be the case with abortion, and its starting now. But that doesn't change the fact that today's world is rife with little fairy-boys who couldn't care less if a woman was being raped in an alley as they walked past it. They either wouldn't care, or their little heart would bleed but they'd be too much a coward to go take a crowbar and cave the rapist's skull in with it.

15) I keep telling you. Because it was not meant to be. Not by conscious design. Not through God's loving contract of marriage.

Plenty of people whom I PERSONALLY KNOW, are conceived outside of marriage, or inside of marriage by unplanned. And they know this. But I love them anyway. A person's origin has nothing to do with the fact that they are Homo Sapiens, HUMAN, made in God's as according to His word, and worthy of all the protections afforded! A person conceived by a rape IS NO LESS HUMAN THAN YOU OR I! I keep telling YOU!

Please do not tell your son. I was a child concieved by rape. I was a closed adoption but with help of search angel was reunited. I found bmom and was told at that time that she was brutally raped. I did not deal well with this bit of information at all.

Yes, surely it is a difficult thing, to not even be scratching the surface. I have said this all along, and everyone else knows it too.

There are countless numbers of other tales like these. Harsh reminders of your torment. Stop passing it off. Would you be prepared to meet all those born of rape who have lived lives of torment and not having biological parents? Those basta*d children would be ridiculed and you allow that in rape cases simply because you can't accept a SCIENTIFIC window through non-sentience to abort. You slimy toad!

Yes, I would in fact love to meet these people. So I could tell them, if they don't know already, just how much God loves them and is a Father to them regardless of how they came to be on earth, or who has scorned them because of it.

Would YOU like to meet them,...and seeing their faces, tell them about how YOU think they should have all been aborted and not allowed to live?

Now tell me, who is a slimy toad?

16) DNA patterns, I get it. AND? Don't you think that hasn't been thought about, you bellend? Go and announce your revelation to a kid, fool.

Apparently (again) you are unaware of what DNA is, I'm so sorry the public schooling system has failed you so, Seanus.

17) Our nature through genetics is not our nurture. Simple enough for you? Sorry, I had to keep it at grassroots level as you would struggle otherwise. We ARE more than just the sum of our parts. Can't you get that?

No kidding, as*hole. I already said this several times. It is apart, once again, from the FACT that as a human being, we begin AT CONCEPTION! Can't you get that?

18) I was addressing its practical application. Blanket forgiveness isn't the reaction of most people. Then again, you aren't most people, hickboy. Punishable under the law, now your neuron has fired. It took you a while. Let the law serve its purpose.

Yes, punishing those who act to harm others, the protection of human life IS the purpose of the LAW!

19) Again, how many times should repentance be allowed? We shouldn't treat them as murderers is my point and that is abundantly clear. The law in on my side here, as in most countries.

How many times? As many times as they are sincere in repenting. Isaid I don't treat them as murderers, even the ones who haven't repented. They are largely deceived and it would be insensitive.

What exactly is your point in all this?

20) Hypocrite, how? Look above to your posts :) :) :)

And you are a cross-dressing Transvestite. How? "Just look above to your posts"

Please connect statements and accusations with reality, and demonstrate the "how" to the rest of us. This you have not done.

Ehm, just to make sure about pro-life activists: they are basically a group of ppl who want to tell women what to do and what not to do. Are they in any form or way so superior that they think they have the right to decide what is good for women? It's a choice a woman has to make herself and religious nutters (yes, I repeat it again) have no business in intervening in this decision-making process.

Yes, surely it has nothing at all to do with the protection of human life, as I have only stated about a hundred times in sequence so far, and will continue. You know, I'm sure the good little Nazis thought similar things of Christians who hid Jews in their homes in Nazi occupied Europe. Damned Religious Nutters. Always out to ruin everyone's fun.

See, and this is the crucial difference between pro-lifers and pro-choicers: the latter respects the decision of a woman, be this abortion or no abortion, while pro-lifers don't respect the choice a grown-up woman makes to have an abortion and instead start to try and indoctrinate the woman with their views. I've never seen demonstrations where pro-choicers try to force their opinion upon anybody else and try to force every pregnant woman to have an abortion. Pro-lifers on the other hand try to force their views upon you every chance they get. Grow up, go to your church and pray for all those "lost souls", maybe it will help, or maybe not; I'd say it won't help much as far as divine intervention goes :)

No. The difference is that "lifers" believe human life is precious and should be protected, in the womb or anywhere else. "Choicers" are cowards and weaklings, even murderers,...they are those who are sexually promiscuous, perverse, rebellious, and how DARE anyone tell them what to do with THEIR body! No morality, just right to do as they please with no consequence.

"My body, my choice". The mantra of the "choicer". Well answer me this then, M-G,...what part of a WOMAN'S body, is the "fetus"? Go on, answer the question you sniveling coward.

In short: let the decision be the woman's, not some religious freak that keeps drabbling on about Jesus and some vengeful God - we don't need to live our life based on an illusion.

Yes, I have done nothing here but keep drabbling on about a vengeful and unforgiving God. Shows you haven't read a word. So shut the f*ck up about it.

You are such a fool, you sit there fat and lazy in your chair, and attack the very One who created you, and whose servants have lived, spoken, fought, bled and died to provide you a safe haven by which to mock and insult them. You are a pimple.

M-G (and time and time again they will come back and back and whenever you think the issue is concluded, they will be back again and on and on and on...Makes me so tired)

Yes, you have perfectly described Seanus. But you forgot to add that he also completely ignores when his "points" are struck down one after the other, and REFUSES to address the most pertinent ones.
Gunslinger44   
3 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

PolishCanuck,....what the hell do you know about anything? You're from Canada.

You apparently know nothing of radiation poisoning, fallout, environmental contamination, or anything else associated with the detonation of nuclear weapons. This is all aside from the simple fact that IF Russia would ever be so retarded as to do such a thing,...the worldwide repercussions would leave the entirety of populated Russia one massive, nightmarish firestorm, killing her population almost absolutely. The US and UK (at least) strategies for nuclear war is the use of many smaller nukes spread over populated areas, rather than one very large bomb making up the same yield tonnage. The reason being to maximize the resulting inferno, creating entire landscapes of firestorms which would destroy everything and everyone, leaving absolute death in their wake. The goal: Total Annihilation of the Civilian Population

Why do you think that there have never been any tactical nuclear weapons ever used against another nation? And no land wars waged against nations bearing nuclear weapons since their creation and proliferation? This stuff is to be feared.
Gunslinger44   
2 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

1) And what does that repentance involve as Protestants don't go to a priest for confession? To what extent is repentance a mitigating factor? It cannot assoilzie/exonerate the 'criminal' of wrongdoing largely as that would lay a dangerous precedent. ....Keep it out of the courtroom, though. It's a spiritual matter..

It involves you LISTENING!!! when I said it is confessed and forgiven by God alone. Prayer.

As to "keep it out of the courtroom",...well you must have about no knowledge whatsoever concerning the judicial system and how we have the good Laws we have,....and oopsie THE FACT THAT THEY MAKE YOU SWEAR UPON THE BIBLE IN THE COURTROOM "SO HELP ME GOD"!!!

Now, what have you to say to that, Mr. Brilliant?

You should care about the views of atheists and agnostics in shaping the law. Are they any less of a human being than you or I? Is their input to the democratic process any less valid? If anything, they are less 'charged' on the issue and that could produce a greater degree of fairness rather than serving agendas as those in the abortion business do. Agreed? ....... Fine, invoke civil disobedience concerns. If they reverse injustice then I am all for it. However, you are more likely to be arrested.

No, I don't care to hear the opinions of Atheists and Agnostics in shaping the Law. Someone who has no fear of God and no moral law to direct them cannot be trusted to have anything to do with shaping laws of nations. So yes, their input is invalid dreck if it differs from God's Law, which is my whole problem with abortion, which was introduced by Godless, wicked, foul murdering beasts.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao,....just to name a few examples of what happens when Godless men take over the Government. Human life is no longer protected. God's Holy Law protects even that child of rape.

You claim to be a Christian? Then read 1 Kings chapter 3,...and you tell me from whom men get Wisdom by which to govern peoples. And the Godless should then rule us? We can learn from history what happens when THAT happens...

Likely to be arrested for what, exactly?

The woman so that they have the choice to say only no to abortion? Elaborate please. Your right position is not others right position. There are many vested interests involved, admit it!

I already did elaborate. The CHILD inside her is a SEPARATE and INNOCENT party, worthy of all protections afforded a human person under the law.

4) Hitler got other people to do his bidding. ...Are you gonna further punish the woman by not even offering a choice? Who should be punished and to what degree according to your Moral law of God?

So? And?

The protection of the baby inside her is not intended to punish the woman, this is an emotional tactic on your part to make it seem as though I am an insensitive dog. This is protection of the new life, as stated several hundred times as yet, by yours truly.

And who should be punished and for what?

Mirriam-Webster takes a different position, citing upright stance, a large brain and spoken language, none of which are possessed by your 'child'. I can cite many more refuting your case but I won't overload you. I have more strings in the bow.

And I have ICBMs waiting in the silos, so sling that "bow" up and rattle your spears, because you are about to be obliterated.

By Merriam-Websters definition, a crippled child, a newborn child, or a mute child, or a mentally handicapped child,...none of them would be truly a child, and none would be protected under the law. Why do you continue to bring up "points" that shoot the arms and legs off of your already crippled, feeble "argument"? It's embarassing really,...in fact I am embarassed FOR you.

5) Ok, God's Word says sodomy is an abomination, a sin. What's your word? Have you no independent thought? Do you tell everyone around you to hold on and let you check God's Word every time they have a puzzler or ethical dilemma? Didn't God impute righteousness into Man in your opinion? (are you a Lutheran, a Calvinist or what?) You said above that you would admit your wife back in after repentance. Do you then agree or disagree with the Catholic (RCC) notion of synterisis (a spark of goodness)? Cutting to the chase, Catholics value good works. Isn't confession, in and of itself, a good work in your eyes? If so, why are you a Protestant? I guess you support Total Depravity. What is your take on infused grace?

I say it is demonstrable beyond doubt that homosexuality is both physically and mentally destructive and retarding to those who participate. That is why, until our most recent plunge into the abyss as a nation, Homosexuality was considered by the American Psychaitric Association to be a mental disorder? They changed it in the 70's,....just like abortion...

And blah blah blah. Look I just read God's word and apply it to life,...like it was meant to be. I'm not in the least interested in your diversion here. If her repentance is real, my forgiveness is real.

Unplanned children to be, born of rape, are often put into an invidious predicament. Mendacious is a good word where the identity of their true parents is kept from them. There are just too many counter arguments against your pro-life position.

So you are going to tell me that, based on FUTURE POSSIBLE AGONIES of the child, we should kill the NON-child to prevent that? And would you not be preventing them from all the POSSIBLE JOYS IN LIFE AS WELL? You are such a hypocrite.

6) The doctor doesn't compel them most of the time, he talks to them and runs them through the potential repercussions. At the end of the day, he is just a part of the process. It is the woman who seeks the abortion for whatever reason.

No. Doctors compel. They are known for this type of thing nowadays. That and asking if the woman wants her "tubes tied" IMMEDIATELY after giving birth. How nice and not at all self-serving of them.

7) Self-respecting in the sense of freeing herself of something that she never asked for and exercising her right to do so.... Are you then going to clear up the mess and adopt this unwanted child? Maybe you should rally round your buddies and prepare for this..

You said what you said. You revealed your true thoughts on this subject. Now lets move on.

Yes, I will "rally round" and prepare for this event that will SURELY HAPPEN, even though the chances of it are one in 150,000. Listen you creep,...IF this ever happened, I would have to deal with it then, and I would either raise the child myself, or if I felt someone else could give the child a better home, there would be plenty of people willing to adopt him or her.

8) "Stop the mad scientist?" I thought you were all for science. It is the basis of your whole case. Oh, you are the guy that hand picks scientific appointments, not based on their ability but on how much they support your line of thought. Gotcha!! It's all clear now!

Science is only the study of things God created. "Science" itself, the deeper they look points to a CREATOR. Science is my friend.

Ever heard of METALLURGY? I like Metallurgy,...cars,...trains,...airplanes,...even weapons for protection,...now imagine someone was using a METAL KNIFE TO KILL PEOPLE! Is my opposition to THAT indicative that I hate Metallurgy? No. You are an idiot, please stop coming up with idiotic arguments, it wastes both our time.

9) I've given a part above about personhood and all the definitions are against you. MORAL philosophers disagree with you. Sentience is directly related to personhood and personhood tests have many prongs. Are you aware of any of them?

I define personhood at the start of a new person; which is conception. Look, I already destroyed "immediate sentiency" as defining a person,...someone who is sleeping, or someone in a coma, or a child who will be sentient within a few WEEKS,...none are NOT A PERSON simply because they are not AT PRESENT fully sentient. Please don't bring this up again, I destroyed it too many times, I feel like I'm in a zombie movie.

Here, 'If we want to go from this to saying that the fetus is also a person, this requires us to show why it it should be regarded as a person (which, as we have seen, is no easy task).'

Because it is someONE WHO will be "sentient" in a matter of weeks. Anyone can see that. If it is cancer, call it cancer,....if it is PREGNANCY call it a BABY!

10) early embryos do not qualify for personhood. I suggest you get a hold of this paper. It shows the connection between sentience and personhood. We can have an individual debate on sentience if you wish.

No, I don't wish. I have a hard enough time getting you to realize that it is immaterial to the debate. But I understand it IS all you have....

11) 'Unfortunately, there is no consensus of when human personhood starts. People have different beliefs' often they regard their own belief as absolutely true and obvious. Even if there were, there is no agreement on the conditions under which an abortion of that new person should be allowed.']

Look, I'm not interested in a bunch of fairies who aren't willing to take a stand against murder,...its better off that such cowards label themselves so I know not to waste time on them.

12) this sums my opinion up nicely. Give the benefit of the doubt to the foetus in standard abortion cases but know that personhood hasn't been defined to reach broad consensus.

And why not "the benefit of the doubt" to the baby of a rape victim? Did something about the rape alter its DNA or make it someone NOT human?

13) If they have no bearing on personhood, what is the use of living? How does a status label preclude all experience which LIFE presents us with externally? Personhood is a human being? Well, I am a human being and I am living and learning different things in life. Did my code dictate that or did my choices dictate that? I was exposed to external stimuli. There are many ifs in life, not strict ways, and if I hadn't met my friend at uni, I wouldn't have gone to Japan etc etc. This was by chance, randomised and not precoded as you would have me believe.

Listen you tool, I conceded fully and heartily that who we BECOME has a number of different factors,...but as a NEW HUMAN PERSON, everything is CREATED IN OUR DNA AT CONCEPTION! OUR OWN UNIQUE DNA, WITH ALL THAT ENTAILS! Is there a simpler way to put this, so even YOU can understand? Obviously you are not in the least scientifically competent.

14) Reading into what you are saying, you would never have us move off of the starting blocks. Conception is the golden moment and we should freeze in this moment and not go out into the world and develop ourselves. That's what you are saying. Of course we will always be human, that is axiomatic. Ripe for killing? What, because they doubt? Pff... Who we are can change through time.

Explain how you have arrived at your brain-sludge conclusions please, you raving lunatic. We shouldn't go out and develop ourselves? Eh? Where did I say or imply ANY SUCH THING? I assure you, I did not. You are insane and I am quickly starting to realize just how much of a waste of time you are....though I am doing this more to let others know the real truth,...rather than because I think there is hope for you.

16) I understand forgiveness, alright. You take such a firm stance against those 'murderers' and yet you accept a 'murderer' back into your house. If I murdered your wife and blew up your house but then sincerely repented, would you truly forgive me? How many heinous deeds could I get away with? Does repentance have limits? Is it only perceived sincerity and then off the hook? Is it principle or number?

Someone who views Christian forgiveness as their playground to do whatever evil they wish, do not understand repentance or forgiveness.

Yes, I would truly forgive you. Though as punishable under the law, to the law you would be given, and you would accept this as a Christian. Jesus asked the Father to forgive the Roman soldiers who crucified Him,...while they were nailing his hands to the cross...

For someone who CLAIMS to be a "Christian" you surely do attempt to make a mockery out of its most profound and meaningful principles.

17) You revere marriage yet you'd throw it all away? She's bound to say she's sorry if she wants to salvage the marriage. This is what married partners should try to avoid, 'irretrievable breakdown'. There is a 'crime' left unpunished in your eyes. A heinous one at that. What if all women did the same? In your eyes, unpunished murder across the board.

Marriage is not above doing what is right. And I could not countenance an unrepentant murderess in my house. As of now, there is no law to punish women who get abortions, not to mention the fact it is so easy to lie to them and tell them it is NOT really a child. Knowing and talking to so many women who have repented of abortion,...as I said, they were unaware. Again, I am speaking from experience, and you are speaking from your *ss. Please stop doing that. The crime, on her repentance, would have been punished, taken by Jesus, just as every other sin.

18) In your beloved Total Depravity Protestant notion, there is the belief that sin is innate to man, that he will sin again and again. You have given women an opt-out clause. A confession can wash away murder, right? Let's be clear, that's what you are saying, right? If so, that's dangerous in that you could have a murderer do his thing and then just confess it all away sincerely. Murderers are of many types, just look at Dexter. Being serious, there are humane murderers according to you. Can you deny this as you regard women who abort as being humane and with no malice aforethought, you've said as much. Still murder in your eyes.

This could apply to any person for any sin ever committed. So pardom me for not participating in your diversion/mockery.
Not all women who abort do it without malice. Some people are different than others. Murderers come in all flavors. What is your point? I guess you did not have one, else we would have arrived at it long ago.

Over to you, Mr Hypocrite :) I'll settle for hippocrate in my case.

Mr. Hypocrite? You're going to have to explain how I am a hypocrite. Do this now.
Gunslinger44   
2 Nov 2009
News / If Poland is attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or not? [171]

If Poland will be attacked by Russia will N.A.T.O help defend Poland or just look the other way?

Poland is NATO since 1999. Yes, NATO will defend Poland unquestionably. Even if Poland was not NATO member, I believe US would step in heavy-handedly. There was talk of a US/Russia war over the Georgia/Ossetia crisis over the past year. It is surprising to hear how many Americans still dislike Russia, even young people. But people do not understand largely the implications of tactical nuclear weapons.

My opinion is Poland will be left alone as no one will help as Russia has nukes and by U.S standards are who has nukes it belongs to untouchable club.

Russia has a population of 140 Million, Poland 38 Million, 3.5 to 1, those are not very bad odds, considering the size of Russia. Factor in that Russia is flat broke, the fact that the US has 300 Million population, Germany 83 Million, UK 60 Million,...

The presence of masses of nuclear weapons possessed by many NATO countries essentially precludes the possiblity of any incursive military action by Russia, ever. And in the event that they are retarded enough to try it,...they would not only be defeated,...they would be utterly annihilated.
Gunslinger44   
2 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

1) I disagree. It got there through a heinous crime and we can't accept that. Tell me, are you a Catholic Christian? If so, in a standard abortion case, can you forgive the woman for having an abortion and then confessing her logic to a priest? What function does penance/repentance serve in your eyes??

Nope. Protestant. Repentance is confessing and fully regretting a sin, a change of heart.

Here, I've just unearthed this, "It is legitimate for the church to have its dogmas, but these dogmas must not be imposed on society as a whole," he added. a very interesting read.?

I should care about this why?

The church is but one player, Gunslinger. I could wrangle with my conscience over the issue but I'm glad that he thinks likewise as a devoted Christian. There are many vested interests in abortion and we need to take a rounded and balanced position.

No. We need to take the RIGHT position. That being that the baby is a human being and worthy of all the protections afforded a human being. Have you listened to a word I have said? Please don't waste my time like this...I truly have better things to do than waste words on fools.

2) It is easier for most to kill without seeing the victim, I agree with you on that. That doesn't make it right but I'm not talking about standard abortion now but abortion for a 14-year old rape victim. A kid if you will. 1973? I'd say that there was a thorough review of the issue and that conventional wisdom changed. Hardly rocket science!

The fact she was 14 or raped is immaterial to the fact the child is a living human being inside her. And I'm so glad to hear that "wisdom" for you is something that can flit about and change colors depending who makes the "laws". It's so nice to know that Hitler didn't really commit any moral trangress by killing the Jews en masse after all. "Conventional wisdom" had changed.

3) Can't you get it through your head the importance of the nuclear family and for a wanted child to be conceived through wedlock? That's normal. Are you against gay marriages btw? That's perceived as a sin, as is sodomy. She didn't plan that child so why should she be forced to bear and raise it? Why should she suffer from being invaded? Iraq has and multiple deaths have resulted from the stirring of the hornet's nest. Proud of that are you? Clown! Again, no malice aforethought and the courts apply legal rules and not God's Law. Let the church condemn and punish as they see fit in accordance with their vision but let the law serves its function/purpose.

Of course the family is important. It is the very foundation of functional society.

Yes, I am against "gay marriages". God's Word says homosexuality is an abomination.

She should be forced to bear the child, as it is a human child with rights afforded by God, if not man. But raise it, no. Oh so now it's only "unplanned" children who are ripe for killing then?

I am against the US invasion of Iraq or any other country. The US had been bombing Iraq for years prior to the 2002 invasion, resulting in over 500,000 civilian deaths. Rough estimate.

4) I can't control what those doctors do so it all boils down to trust that they follow the Hippocrates Oath and Helsinki Principles on ethical conduct. We need trust as humans, wouldn't you agree? Let those doctors be punished accordingly by whatever appropriate standards. Doctors are only human, they can be wrong. My mother often knew what was wrong with her better than her male doctor did. Still, we have entrusted them with responsibilities, one of which is to make the call on abortion. Deal with it!!?

Only fools trust a doctor who tell them to have an abortion. I could do nothing but persuade them otherwise.

5) I threw a hypothetical at you. If we can mass kill through AIDS (Detrick's own baby) then we can mass create through available science. You answered exactly as I thought. You'd allow all manner of social ills and horrible problems to result from the mass swelling of the population rather than avert the problem when you could. It says a lot about you.

You truly are a snake. "mass kill through AIDS" reference please, what the hell are you talking about? And to create masses of test tube babies you would need masses of women willing to partake of such an abomination. Like I said, love the children born, stop the mad scientist. It's simple really. Again you resort to ridiculous and unrealistic scenarios to try to snake around the real issue, THE PERSONHOOD OF THE UNBORN BABY!

And "all manner of social ills" what about the fact that there are 50 MILLION children murdered in America alone since 1973!

6) My wife pointed out my inaccuracy too. I meant to say physical restitution, sorry. Of course she bears the scars emotionally and I'm fed up with you trying to trip me up on this and say otherwise. From here on in, I say unequivocally that we must always have this in mind. Her welfare is paramount. Physically removed like it never happened, no reference to the emotional aspect which we agree on.

Of course she will bear scars, for the rest of her life she will. But it has been proven that the abortion due to the rape ADDS ANOTHER AND DEEPER SCAR!!! Oh but don't read anything about the actual STUDY DONE on this very specific subject, because that's not pertinent, is it!

Don't give me this "who, me?" sh*t, you piece of Jell-o. The OBVIOUS AND UNMISTAKEABLE implication is that a woman who DOESN'T get an abortion after a rape, doesn't respect herself. That was your intent and meaning, because this was always about YOUR feelings on the issue. And seeing as the facts are that 75-85% of these victims DO NOT get an abortion,...its nice to know how you look down upon them, after pretending this whole time it was about THEIR feelings.

8) A person starts at birth in the eyes of many. That's why we have the development of zygote-embryo-foetus building up to that. Define personhood. What are its essential features? If it not sentient, is it a real human? By the accounts of Glannon, sentience begins at 23-24 weeks,

Listen to me very carefully,...personhood is a human being. A human being's life begins at the point of conception, when HE OR SHE IS CREATED by a sperm and egg joining. It is how human life begins and I suggest that you go back to High School and learn about it again.

Are you honestly retarded? I said that SENTIENCY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PERSONHOOD! Look at the DNA if nothing else, and look at the obvious fact it is a growing BABY! "What are its essential features?" Please spare me the dumb act, you're good enough at actually BEING dumb that you don't need to ad lib.

Let's say that he is wrong and that sentience begins at 12 weeks, 89% of foetuses are aborted by then. By 23-24 weeks, virtually all in all likelihood. You cannot underestimate sentience. If an unborn child doesn't have the sensory awareness necessary to be dubbed sentient, then they are not yet a person.

I already threw away sentiency long ago. I know the grief process it complicated,...but you need to at some point recognize that sentiency does not constitute personhood. Hey, there are drugs that put people into comas, maybe we can just go about doing that to people, and then they will no longer be a person and we can do what we will to them!

9) Genetic make-up is one half of the debate and you didn't even address nurture there so what's the sense in debating with you

"Debating" would have to mean that you actually aknowledge themes and questions I have repeated to you over and over and over again. The person's genetic make-up (what makes them a BIOLOGICAL PERSON, and I say spiritual as well) is ALL PRESENT and GROWING at the point of conception. All other things which impact how a person TURNS OUT TO BE, can occur all throught their life, and have no bearing on their personhood at conception.

A new person is like a clean slate (and no, I don't mean a person is a piece of rock) they can input things into their own mind, or other people can, they can acquire emotional and physical scars, self-inflicted or otherwise. All those means nothing as to WHEN THAT PERSON STARTED TO BE A HUMAN, and THAT, Science tells us, begins AT CONCEPTION! And your "midlife crisis" thing only PROVES that our realization of who we are is irrelevent to the fact we are still a person. Otherwise the second someone "doubts" their identity, they are ripe for killing. Why would you bring up something that shoots the legs off your own argument?

I defined personhood several times already. Are you truly this dull, or are you simply making me repeat myself for sport?

12) Cleansing is important in cases such as dealing with a 14-year old rape victim.

Women feel even MORE "dirty" AFTER HAVING AN ABORTION! It dramatically increases their physical and emotional trauma! Read the study done on the subject, which you continue to blatantly disregard, SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS THE MOST PERTINENT PIECE OF RESEARCH REGARDING THIS ISSUE!!! So to hell with your "cleansing".

Surely there are hard issues out there. But do not expect me to wring my limp-wristed hands together and pity a pile of swinish monsters marching for the "right" to continue to murder their own offspring. Where are the tears for all the children who were never born, but cut apart and thrown away like trash? I assure you, the would-be mothers weep for them, and the ones who don't have pent it up so much that they cannot, but please tell me more about their "feelings" oh wise one!

Consideration of whether or not she and I would be ready to take on raising a child in such cisrcumstances. There are plenty of people willing to adopt a baby. Oh wait,...I see,...we should choose to KILL the child, but cannot choose to let someone else adopt it? Please don't go there.

If I felt that she was truly sorry I would welcome her back with open arms,...as God does for all repentant sinners. But it is God she needs forgiveness from, not me. Even after the fact, prior to her (possible) repentance,...I would be reaching out to her in any way I could. Just like God does.

So,...you are a Christian,....and you DON'T understand what forgiveness is? I thought I am supposed to be the insensitive dog here?

My wife has just called you an insensitive pig and that you should crawl back under your stone. You would do that to your own wife, after being RAPED? Wow, you have just demonstrated that it is YOU with the problem..

Wow. Have you told your wife about your "A self respecting woman would have an abortion" thing? Go tell some women who have given birth to their child conceived by rape, and love the child, see what they think. Mr. Sensitive.

Tell your wife I'm glad that she enjoys reading my material.

You are nothing more than a strict liability advocate who doesn't have the computational and analytical ability to see the bigger picture. The whole family dimension just doesn't count in your eyes, the whole Christian institution of marriage and the sanctity of choice either.

Yes, as I stated, without marriage you have a failed and rapidly crumbling society, so in fact I highly esteem marriage. But "Sanctity of choice"? Here's your "sanctity of choice, you swine!

impiousdigest.com/completebody10.jpg

I don't give a rat crap who I am "offensive" to,...if someone finds it offensive that I will not move one inch where it concerns sanctity of LIFE, then that person is someone whose opinion gets lumped in with pedophiles, rapists, and murderers, and if all of them hate me,...then praise God that I am an enemy of His enemies, and forever shall be.

It is God's word, read Psalm 139:

For you created my inmost being;
you knit me together in my mother's womb.

I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
your works are wonderful,
I know that full well.

My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret place.
When I was woven together in the depths of the earth,

your eyes saw my unformed body.
All the days ordained for me
were written in your book
before one of them came to be. Psalm 139:13-16


Yes, it does. Jesus died to cleanse us of ALL sin, to include murder. Its not up to me to "forgive them", but God, and He says He will, and He does. And umm,...yes that goes for ALL WOMEN who ever repent of abortion. In what way exactly is this unclear to you? I know many women who have repented of abortion,...and I dearly love them. Women in general are unaware that they have actually killed their own child in abortion, but they have extreme guilt,...and it can take decades to come to terms with it, even more so the older generation when the facts of humanity in the unborn child were more cleverly concealed by the abortion lobby.

Do you think God is stupid, and He cannot know the difference between true repentance and false? Even a discerning human person can see through such evil ruses.

Affections or good graces, love too? Isn't Love divine? Didn't God give us his grace, which is unconditional anyway? We can see much evidence of this in the Bible.

Yes, we certainly can see it, it is the main theme and purpose of the Bible.

You have abandoned your principles anyway by taking a 'criminal' back, right?

How exactly did I "abandon" my principles by accepting my woman back after she had repented? Aren't I supposed to be the insensitive one here? I should show Her less love than God Himself?
Gunslinger44   
2 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

1) Yes but I am talking about rape victims here, not standard abortions and that's where you are going wrong.

Abortion is the killing of a growing child in its mother, so the "how" the baby got there is immaterial as to the moral ramifications of abortion.

2) There are other threads for discussing this conflict

Yes, and I do not care to.

Its sure easy to have someone killed who you never have to even look at, isn't it now? Politicians and lawmakers are in general very biased and bent on steering society to their own Godless, empty version of a morality-free existence. Of course they agree that to murder a person we all can see is "wrong",...if they didn't they would be publicly ostracised. What say you to the fact that before 1973, abortion was illegal in the US?

Those emotional waves you are riding so high on, pertain (perhaps in lesser degree) to any illegitimate child. Maybe we should just go about killing all the unhappy children in the world. That will make the world a happy place, and you won't have to ever "worry" about anyone else's feelings ever again. Won't that be wonderful, you dear bleeding heart?

Personal unhappiness does not constitute the right to kill someone. This would go in the filing cabinet under D for "Duh".

5) Abortion is murder? Well, prima facie, and according to the definition you pick, it could be. That's why there is a need for consistency. As I said before, malice aforethought is not in the mind of the woman in most cases and you admitted that. Also, there is sufficient flexibility to say that, if the child is likely to have subsequent mental health problems, then that may be enough to get an abortion. Again, back to quality of life but I see your point that we can't pick and choose. We have retarded children and they have as much right to live as others. What would you say if sb went mad and went on a wild campaign to create millions of test tube babies? Would you accept the growth in population?

We now have evil "doctors" who will "inform" women as to POSSIBLE complications and or/abnormalities in their growing child,...and advise abortion. Downs Syndrone is one example. I know of several cases personally of such "doctors" advising such, the mother rejected it, and the baby is born healthy. Man wants to play God, and that never ends well. If it hadn't been for Courtney Love's violent protection of her baby from such doctors; Frances Bean Cobain would have been butchered alive inside her mother, under the premise that she would be abnormal due to Courtney's on/off drug addictions.

Millions of test-tube babies? What would you say if there was a giant tarantula that was 15 stories high and had laser-beam eyes, destroying the city of Los Angeles! Let's be more ridiculous, please? But to answer your retarded question, I would say not to kill a single one of the test-tube babies, but to stop the mad biologist.

No, it is NOT restitution. A woman who is raped without a child then is "devoid of that painful memory"? Wow. Shows just how ZERO you know about the psychological effects of abortion OR rape.

And you still provided no "stats" because like I said they don't exist and you are full of sh*t. My stats are not made up. Please explain how you have arrived at this brilliant conclusion, Holmes?

7) Again, you just need the humane mind to tell you how trauma works. Nobody should profit from this and I'm not impressed with either your deflection in this way or your reference to 'harping on'. We are dealing with a 14-year old girl and she needs a curator bonis and other professional help. We can't understate that.

Oh please tell me more, Mr. Humanitarian of the Year aka "self-respecting women of rape get abortions". You don't know sh*t, and to top it off, you judge women who choose to let their baby live to be lesser women for it.

We are dealing with a 14 year old. And also a "Few Week old". Both are victims of trauma and need love, care, and protection. Got it?

You call this rational debate? You continue to ignore the FACTS, while espousing your own baseless sh*t opinions and claim to be speaking for pregnant rape victims!

No, sentience is NOT relevant here. As far as genetic make-up, yes, who you are is determined at the point of conception. Science upholds this as absolute truth. People can change, for the better or for the worse, based on many different factors, throughout their entire lives. But as a PERSON, they STARTED at conception.

9) You say that who we are is determined at conception, right? Our whole self isn't and that's what makes the collective 'us', the ego and the id etc etc. Without plunging into the abyss that is Nature Vs Nurture, I have 2 words for you, MIDLIFE CRISIS. Also, what about those that become schizophrenic through LSD use or other causes? Those that were normal before I mean. Was that written in the genes too or did set&setting decide it? The environment is key here, not genetics (although I agree that drugs merely trigger the onset of schizophrenia in some). See the complications? I'm prepared to delve into them rather than taking black+white positions. I suggest you start doing the same.

Again you bring up something completely irrelevent to this discussion. I'll say it again, with Science having my back (facts, like I said) genetic make-up, to include ALL the code of the NEW HUMAN PERSON is DETERMINED AT CONCEPTION! The philosophical side of "who we are" has NO BEARING ON THIS WHATSOEVER! But nice diversion, it may have even worked on someone more dull.

And why is 12 weeks the "critical period"? What EXACTLY about "12 weeks" makes a person a person instead of a "zygote"? I can't wait to hear this answer,...that is IF you dare to even answer it.

Where is a child birth certificate 1 week before birth? What about children born in places or under circumstances where they never GOT a birth certificate? Are you really so fresh out of ideas, and have become so desperate? A cripple, a small child, or a mentally handicapped person cannot do many things that "people" can do. Once again you come around to defining whether someone is human or not by what actions or thoughts they are capable of. I know a fine chap named "Hitler" who thought in much the same way. Hmm.

So to kill the child is "cleansing"? Thank God that 75-85% of rape victims don't think the way you do (and the other 15-25% feel more dirty because of it), but you are their spokesperson, so I guess it doesn't matter what they think after all.

Are you still so dull? Abortion of a living human PERSON is MURDER REGARDLESS OF THE MEANS BY WHICH THAT PERSON WAS CREATED! The woman needs healing for her trauma, ABORTION IS ONLY MORE TRAUMA FOR HER! Abortion = deeply hurtful, possibly deadly for mommy, and almost always deadly for baby.

12) Your last para is loose and bears no relation to what I wrote. Just a rant really.

Well I am glad to hear you are a Christian, and that you are "mostly" pro-life. But I draw the battle lines with no quarter given at abortion, as I'm sure you can see. Just because we "encounter death" does not mean we should create death, and certainly not against a completely innocent one.

With all I have I would try to convince her to let the child live,...possibly even raise it as our own (this would take much consideration) but upon receiving all the facts of life,...if she still chose to abort the child, I could not continue with her. If later she regretted and repented, I would receive her back,...but not before. What you have essentially asked me is "Will you abandon your principles handed to you by God, for the affections or good graces of a woman" and the answer to that question will always and invariably, God help me, be a resounding "No". But thankfully the chances of this (God forbid it) happening are not only virtually non-existant, but the chances of her wanting death for the child are even less than that.
Gunslinger44   
1 Nov 2009
Love / What do Polish women think of feminism? [99]

I'll defend her. True. When most of patriarchal males doing sex with their wifes their wifes are counting flies on the net of spider at the room corner. These women have to stay silent due to fear as they are under pressure of such male society who dont have brain, but, physical body only. (btw, she did a good stirring by a truth. bravo.)

This has got to be a joke.

I would agree that by what I hear from women from all nationalities, men could use some serious help in the area of making love,...but for you to say the woman is doing anything to keep her mind off of it? That is ridiculous. In my experience, women want sex just as badly, or worse, than men want it.

As to the "counting flies in the web",...well your statement says much more about you and YOUR unfulfilled sex life, than it does about men in general. Which would go for any feminist who would say similar things.

Like if I were to say:

"Women are nothing but ****** and pigs" (I would never say such a thing, this is an example).

To the discerning person, this would translate as:

"I am unmanly and socially inept, I could not satisfy a woman with all the Viagra in the world,...and the ones desperate enough to date me quickly flee when they find out what I am really like".

You see? :)

One should accept the reality. Female world have been sleeping (have to be kept in sleep forcefully) for a veryyy loong timeee. Only these brothel houses being operated forcefully by male world are enough to see somethings wrong. As a male, would you like your life to be spent in a house by being fuc*ked by many fat, dirty, smelly women coming and going every hour? Misery lifes.

This is foolish and incorrect thinking, and as a man I take extreme offense to being lumped in with vermin and swine, pimps and johns.

Prostitution is evil and degrading to women. Men who consort among such, and especially men who partake it enslaving the women in such manner, are not men at all, but cowards and devils.

Real men want a wife who is feminine, who loves them and will care for the home, the children, and them. A real woman loves this role, and would accept no other. Like I said previously, so very many feminists are now regretting wasting their lives without children, and without being a home-maker. A woman who is driven to be the bread-winner and to abandon her position of home-keeper,...is just as repulsive and counter-intuitive as a man wanting to give birth and breast-feed children and stay at home mothering then while the woman works. It is something scornful and abominable.

A woman, by design of her body and spirit, is meant to compliment the man, be his helper, she is not created for leadership. This is why it is women who are enslaved as prostitutes,...and not the other way around, because they are the weaker,...and the reason they are enslaved and used,...instead of loved and protected,...is because of cowardly and swinish "men" do not know how to love a woman,...and men who should be putting an end to such activity have abandoned their position of leadership,...for the comfort of the reclining chair and the HDTV.
Gunslinger44   
1 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Like I said, I could not care less what some useless, self-serving swine with a robe has to say about it. At the point of conception, it is a new person in growing stages. Most women do not even know they are pregnant until 8 weeks after conception, at which point the baby is about 2 inches long, fully recognizable as human. The heartbeat starts at 3 weeks.

You are being dishonest in calling the baby a "will likely be". Wrong. It is an IS. The possibility of miscarriage is completely irrelevent here. Same as would be the case with a post-natal human child, the possibility of SIDS or any other killing agent does not affect the humanity of the child.

The fact you would attempt to use such dishonesty makes me question your intentions. Most women do not know they are pregnant until about 8 weeks. 88% of abortions are committed between 6-12 weeks of pregnancy, with virtually NONE at less than 5 weeks. And like I said,...the heart-beat starts at 3 weeks, regular brain waves at 6-8 weeks. Let's put it this way,...no one has an abortion unless they know there is a person growng inside them. If it's "only a blob of tissue" then why is it called "pregnancy" and not "cancer". So please, in the future, spare me this "what baby?" bullsh*t, OK?

2) You are confusing the militant wing of Hamas with normal, everyday Palestinians who are not aggressive by nature. Anyway, kids should be well-nourished beings.

Most of them will not express their true feelings concerning this, but Islam is well-known as a murderous religious entity, the founder of the religion was an outright murderer and pedophile. Palestinians are ok people in general, but like I said, if the situation were reversed,...were it not for the fear of retribution from the rest of the world,...I think the Palestinians would exterminate the Jews systematically just as Hitler did, but perhaps with less "mercy". Judaism espouses the same type of "anyone else is fit for killing" ideals (read the Talmud), but is much more tactful about it, Islam is more honest as to their true nature. Who would I feel more "safe" among, religious Judaics or religious Muslims? The Judaics. They might hate me in their hearts,...but they are far less likely to act on it.

3) They don't have malice aforethought, right. Therefore, it doesn't fit the definition of murder as you have claimed that abortion is. Wanna try and meet the definition of infanticide then? This is definitional stuff and concerns the nature of crimes. I'll give you the legal definitions as this is my specialism from uni.

How is it not clear to you yet that I don't care about how the "law" defines murder? Murder is the wrongful intentional killing of a human being. Not malice, anger, hate, or any other emotion need be present. The most proficient killers in history are those who express no emotion in doing so. The whole problem is that it is "legal"! Where the "law" fails to protect innocent little ones, I am forever a sworn enemy of that "law".

Infanticide is murder of an infant. To me that is a small child, whether post- or pre-natal. Science tells me a new human being starts growing AT CONCEPTION.

4) First off, I don't assume either way if you have considered that point or not. I don't 'think' that at all as I don't know you. You are just a forum user like I at this time. Gunslinger, please don't turn it on its head. I am well aware of the love and support that many adoptive parents provide. That's in no way in question. However, there is no substitute for real parents, right? You didn't address my questions directly at all. Wow, you could be a legislator ;) ;) ;) God gives us all love, yes!

Please tell me what questions I did not directly address? I tend to go for the intended meaning, rather than to waste time with endless word-ology, which is a waste of both our time.

5) Ridiculous, Gunslinger! Suicidal thoughts are the corollary of being raped for many. Rape is the proximate cause and abortion is then restitution. What is a "completed rape"? ....."Murderous social plague"? You have just admitted above that it isn't murder, albeit tacitly. Why on earth are you discussing numbers when I am discussing principle? .....Emotion driven as opposed to robot driven? I'm a human, are you? Are the two, reason and emotion, mutually incompatible? According to you, I don't even feel for the woman anyway but am somehow selfish in addressing practicalities.

A completed rape is vaginal penetration. Simple. I thought you would understand that. I never admitted that abortion is not murder,...as a matter of fact, I stated that abortion IS murder, several times, quite clearly, and without stuttering, I also implied it heavily throughout this discourse. And I will do so again: Abortion is MURDER!

I am bringing up numbers that prove that you were WRONG about YOUR numbers. This always has and always will be about principle for me. But don't ever think that I won't bring up statistics to back up what I say, when you continue to speak FOR the women in question, assuming their emotions FOR them! Abortion is NOT restitution! Look into studies done on this subject (do a search, I'm not going to be your homework-monkey here) concerning women's feelings on this subject. The baby is human and worthy of protection regardless of the mother's feelings, same as any other post-natal child, but the fact is that MOST RAPE VICTIMS WHO BECOME PREGNANT BY THE RAPE, CHOOSE TO LET THEIR CHILD LIVE! 75-85% OF THEM!

I have emotions, I am human. But human emotion does not constitute morality. Abortion cheerleaders will constantly harp upon the emotions of the easily-swayed idiotic masses about the "rape and incest" victims, who represent less than 1% of abortions. They do not tell you about the depression, guilt, of abortion,...how the women suffer silently for years and years with it,...not feeling able to tell anyone or talk to anyone. The abortion Industry MAKES BIG CASH OFF OF THIS! They aren't here to "help". If you have ever had any discussion with women who have come to terms with the guilt of abortion,...the pain inside them is profound and certainly very real. But please, you know all about their feelings, so continue to harp on it.

Sentiency is meaningless as it concerns a growing person (not to mention the fact it RAPIDLY loses ground AT LEAST at the point of brain waves, 6-8 weeks). Personhood begins at conception. Who you ARE (at the very LEAST biologically speaking) is determined at conception. Why not make "intelligibility" a constituent of personhood, or how about the ability to survive with NO help outside of themselves,....the ability to keep a steady job,...how big your car is,...your race,...? The thing these all have in common with "sentience" is that NOT ONE OF THEM MEAN SH*T as it concerns what a human person is! I not only wiped out sentience with one dismissive stroke,...but I stamped it into the ground with my boot and **** all over it.

7) Easy answer for me. I don't give a toss what she is concerned about, her stats matter. 89% abort within 12 weeks according to those stats. The remaining ones, well, abortion is not black&white so, without further knowledge of the specifics of those cases, I care not to pass judgement.

And I already stated, Science AND GOD (fancy that) say that personhood begins AT CONCEPTION. So 89% of abortions are committed between 6-12 weeks. So what? Like if someone told me "Well, did you know that MOST infanticides occur before the child is even 2 weeks old?" WHO CARES!

8) OK, I'm prepared to admit that my stats were way too high (I only surmised after all) but, based on one source, I am not going to believe that yours are any better. How do I know that those views weren't extracted to serve an agenda? Where is my guarantee?

No. Your stats were not "too high", they were non-existant. Mine are real and based in fact, and I presented them.

Yes, surely we pro-lifers are a self-serving lot. We uphold children, financially, emotionally, and in all other ways,...while the "choicers" either abort for convenience or money, and abortion industry gets rich off of their murders. Your "arguments" are irrational and foolish.

It stands to reason that many women would get an abortion after rape if they are self respecting individuals.

Nice. Here you show your true colors. This was and always WILL BE about YOUR FEELINGS concerning this subject! And it was so very touching, heart-warming even, that YOU HAVE CALLED EVERY VICTIM OF RAPE WHO CHOSE LIFE, LESS OF A WOMAN FOR IT!

You aren't and never WILL BE the victim of rape or pregnancy, yet you place your own putrid "feelings" in place of THEIRS? How dare you!

9) I think you were ignorant as I was referring to that link which you likely didn't even read. Hmm, "in reference to the link 2 paras above" is not clear enough for you??? I wasn't talking about the pro-life lobby as a whole.

I know and consort with other anti-abortion people regularly, to say that a large portion of them are medical personnel (either nurses, or doctors) would be an understatement. Oh, you weren't talking about "the pro-life lobby as a whole"? Oh sorry mate my bad, I guess you were only talking about the part of them that is NOT medically accredited. How transparent and self-serving of you. And no I didn't read your link, abortionists are murderers and liars. They have and continue to lie about anything, so long as what they actually DO remains largely unknown to the public. And you have proven in this thread that YOU are willing to use dishonesty to "present" your case also.

10) I thought, firstly, that you'd recognise what wink marks meant. Secondly, that it was taken from a play you no doubt know, Jesus Christ Superstar, in the 39 lashes scene..

No, I didn't recognize it. I have no need of trivialized and irreverent representations of Jesus Christ.

So, what is "the real truth"?

M-G, let me answer your question. The pro-life lobby have neatly circumvented that problem. They have introduced laws which expressly forbid the adoptive parents from revealing the identity of the kid's real parents within a given time frame. They want to normalise the relationship with the kid at the expense of, da da, the truth. Is that the "real truth", Gunslinger? LOL Seek and you shall find ;0 ;)

Nice one. You favor cutting the child to pieces with a sharp instrument, and then sucking the pieces out with a vacuum,...yet the "pro-life" lobby attempts to introduce laws (that are not lies or deceptions) which protect the childs mental well-being, and you look upon that scornfully? All this time you have been parading as though you were in favor of the child's feelings? Smiling and holding flowers out, with a bloody knife behind your back. Do me a favor; don't keep ****ing down my back and tell me it's raining.

I'm done with you. You have proven to be exactly the selfish sort of vermin that is prevalent among the Free World's "menfolk".
Gunslinger44   
1 Nov 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

The real truth is that many legislators from around the world have ruled it to be legal and we should try and at least hear them out

Legislators are known scumbags almost universally. If you know the facts about abortion, just how very human the child is, how hellish and abominable the act of abortion is (I dare you, go see some videos of an abortion,...I won't even watch those), and the fact that "rape and incest" cases constitute less than 1% of the 4000-a-day (which I also oppose obviously) abortions done in America alone,...then no,...I do not care to hear what some fat, overpaid, pompous piece of rat filth legislator has to say in favor of it.

I'm a humanitarian guy who protests stances against the Palestinians and any other oppressed peoples. I would also like to see conceived babies emerge as well-nourished, healthy ones. However, we musn't let that blight our judgements.

Well good then. I also oppose the oppression of Palestinians. I also oppose the Palestinian view that they "own" the land (I mean as a whole, not those who are deed holders), and its undeniable that Palestinians want all of Israel to be theirs. The whole Israel and Philistia (Palestine) thing has been going on for millenia, Israel, oppressive as it is, is I think far less oppressive and murderous than would be the Palestinians if they had the upper hand. Not so much because of ethnic reasons,...but because Palestine is muslim. Islam is the bastard religion of a pedophile murder, and it shows in the conduct of its people all across the world. But I digress... :)

Gunslinger, I want you to address these issues:

1) Do you really think that most women have malice aforethought when making the decision to abort?

Absolutely not. I would say virtually none of them have malice aforethought. I know this from experiences in anti-abortion field.

2) Is it fair and natural to the kid to allow the situation to arise where they must ask their adopted parents who their real parents are? Is it fair to keep that as a secret from them? How would you like to hear that you were a bast*rd child not born out of wedlock and love (as God would have it) but out of a heinous crime such as rape? Depending on the sensitivity of the child, that could lead to infinite torment and a collapse of their identity. After all, the purpose of life is a life of purpose. I don't know about you but part of that purpose involves a rich family life with parents who wanted me and still want me. Their love and support is invaluable and priceless to me. What sentimental feelings has that child born of rape? Does quality of life have no meaning to you??

Haha! Seanus, I love you man. Because I can tell you have actually put some thought into this, ie you actually do care. And I love that you think that I have not thought about such things before.

Surely the thought of a child growing up knowing he or she was the product of rape is a terrible thing, to say the least. My words could not do justice the all the pain involved in such a situation. But I know of so many people, who God bless them they would adopt a child with any disabilities, and with any background, and have, and continue to. Why? Because they are Christian, and they understand that real and deep love comes from God, and is in spite of all the dirt, filth, and pain that surrounds us as fallen people,...and especially in cases such as this. Real Christian people know and understand God, the fact the God the Father sent His only Son Jesus to die for our filthy disgusting sins, and to cleanse us thereof,...shows truly, that God loves, even who we think is most un-loveable.

"Sing to God, sing praise to his name,
extol him who rides on the clouds -
his name is the LORD-
and rejoice before him.

A father to the fatherless, a defender of widows,
is God in his holy dwelling.

God sets the lonely in families,
he leads forth the prisoners with singing;
but the rebellious live in a sun-scorched land." Psalm 68:4-6


3) Also, check out suicide.org/rape-victims-prone-to-suicide.html. It says that 33% of rape victims are prone to suicide so that's a further danger in and of itself. Wouldn't you want to drop the burden by aborting? The kid will always serve as a harsh reminder by being carried around in her belly.

Yes, rape victims are more prone to suicide. That is a separate issue entirely from abortion.

Here are statistics compiled. Of approximately 150,000 completed rapes per year (obviously something like this fluctuates, but not so extremely) a very very liberal estimate of 500 of them will result in pregnancy. This means that a woman who is raped (regardless of whether this be statutory, assault, or other) has a 0.33% chance of becoming pregnant. And of that extremely liberal estimation, 75-85% of the mothers choose to have the child. Hmmm,...do you think that MAYBE the abortion Industry is USING poor rape victims to spread their murderous social plague?

physiciansforlife.org/content/view/492/26/

Look into it. Your speculation on the issue is meaningless and emotion driven.

Another issue, foetal sentience. What awareness does it have of termination?

In the event of a nuclear attack, victims in the hypocenter of the warhead strike zones feel nothing. They are merely vaporized. Awareness at time of death is not a constituent of what makes murder wrong. In the future, please do not use such bogus premises.

'Ann Furedi, director of the Birth Control Trust, is more concerned about the psychological impact that this kind of speculation could have on women: 89 per cent of aborted foetuses are less than 12 weeks old, only 1.2 per cent of abortions are carried out when the mother is above 20 weeks pregnant, usually because of foetal abnormality', taken from a brilliant article

Abortion has severe psychological impact on the would-be mother, regardless of whether she was the victim of rape/incest (extremely rare) or otherwise.

What Ann Furedi is "concerned" about, is this sort of real information going mainstream,...putting her out of a job,...and inciting the wrath of the people against her for the murder she profits from. What a filthy, pestilential, swine of a woman. And my my, she is married to the leader of the Communist Party in Britain. Frank Furedi is a Hungarian Jew. Nothing against Jews as a race, and I know plenty good ones,...but damn if they aren't ALWAYS at the forefront of everything communistic and murderous. I see this not only in positions of abortion "leadership" CONTINUOUSLY,...but also universally among smaller activist groups.

I surmise that the number of aborted foetuses for raped women would be even higher, between 95-100%.

Wrong. Here is an article that goes into that, and much deeper. It lets the mothers speak also. MOST women who are the victims of rape, choose to have their child. Remember, that child is part of them, probably looks a lot like them etc.

afterabortion.org/rape.html

NOT ONE of the pro-life lobby had any meaningful medical expertise?? Doesn't inspire much confidence!

I would call you a dirty rotten liar, but I know you just were ignorant.

aaplog.org
physiciansforlife.org/content/view/61/30/

And did you ever hear of Ron Paul?

This is just off the top of my head. The pro-life "lobby" is CHOCK-FULL of experts in the medical field, most specifically those involved in Ob/Gyn areas.

We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? ;)

I am not of the persuasion that truth is relative. If that were true then there would BE no truth. No. Truth is absolute, rock-solid, cannot be moved, harder than diamond, far surpassing all physical and spiritual barriers and attacks. The winds of Time cannot change it, nor can the schemes of false and designing men alter it. It stands.
Gunslinger44   
31 Oct 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Seanus, honestly man, I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to say?

It is precisely BECAUSE I value God's creatures,...and very especially humans, whom He made in His image, that I am here "debating" with a bunch of selfish goons from hell, on an internet forum no less.

Did you know, Seanus, that Hitler himself stated that one of the main reasons for gassing the Jews, was that there was less suffering involved than via other means? He just wanted "rid of a problem", he believed they were not human. Surely there is much darkness surrounding the whole abortion debate, but the facts are there for those who care to read up on it. Many women don't even know they were killing their own child, and after many years of emotional torture, come to terms with that fact. There are far too many variables to lay generalizations about on women who have abortions (a lot of it has to do with irresponsible and cowardly "fathers") but people in general who speak in favor of abortion, are selfish cowardly abominable pieces of sh*t, and as stated, their worthless opinions go in the sh*t-dumpster, where they belong. Over 50 million of America's children cut apart and thrown away like trash,...and watch how many of these selfish vermin swarm onto a single rape case to tout abortion as the savior of the afflicted. Spare me.

In the eyes of God, killing an innocent human being (and who is more innocent than a baby?) is murder, regardless of whether the emotion of "hate" is present. I am not at all interested in Scots Law, or any other law, only God's Law. Seanus I hold nothing against you, but don't expect me to change my views when I know the real truth. I cannot.
Gunslinger44   
30 Oct 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

ou don't like abortions? So don't have one. Simple.

Not really. Considering that it is a living human child, and worthy of protection regardless of what Satanic "laws" are passed in whatever country.

Of course it didn't know its mother. It didn't know anything: it wasn't capable of thought!

A baby has normal brain waves between 6 and 8 weeks from conception. How do YOU know it wasn't thinking anything? All a baby in the womb knows is that it is warm and safe. A newborn baby is certainly not capable of intelligible communication, so are you going to tell me that infanticide of a post-natal baby is OK because it cannot talk or show signs of intelligence beyond that of an animal?

Come to think of it, I have no discernable memories further back than age 5,...I guess someone could have taken a giant metal instrument,...cut me to pieces with it,...and sucked me out of my bed with a vacuum cleaner,...and no moral transgress would have taken place.

Or should we use the "viability" argument? A child cannot survive without help from parents until probably 7 years old (guessing here, it would differ depending on the child) so I guess anyone who is proven to not be able to survive without outside help, is ripe for killing. Which would include you.

But here's an idea: inside you are two perfectly good kidneys, two perfectly good lungs and two perfectly good corneas, all of which can be transplanted into people who have none. Once you have used your body to give life to people who need it, then you can criticise people who refuse to do the same. You do give blood as often as you medically can, don't you?

Do I need to have been a Jew, or hosted Jews in my house, to say it is wrong to murder a Jew? The simple fact you condone abortion tells me exactly what kind of selfish piece of monkey-sh*t that you are, so I don't want to hear some sanctimonious bullsh*t from you about "your" requirements for someone to have a right to speak the truth. You sure do have a mighty high horse for someone who advocates the killing of children inside their mothers. You DO nothing, you stand for nothing, you ARE nothing. I lump people like you in the "Sh*t" bin, along with all the other pedophiles, rapists, and murderers. Your opinion is sh*t to me. Like if a child-molester came up to me and started telling me I shouldn't say pedophiles should be killed, I not only would not give a sh*t what he had to say,...but all my energies would be preoccupied in NOT beating him to death where he stood.
Gunslinger44   
30 Oct 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

I'm not sure what you're saying:

1. Abortion is okay for non-Christians?

All mankind will be judged by God's Law alone. I myself would be found guilty on that great day,...except Jesus died for me, in my stead. So no,...abortion is not "OK" for anyone. I oppose it in all its forms. It is murder.

2. You want to impose your religious values in the law and make non-Christians abide by them?

Absolutely. It's already been done in America, it's where we got our real and good laws. Ask the Founding Fathers.

God's Law is above man's law, just as the heavens are above the earth. "Thou shalt not Murder" "Thou shalt not commit adultery" "Thou shalt not steal" "Thou shalt not give false testimony"

Where exactly did you think laws came from, anyway? God's Laws have proven to be peaceful, loving, kind,...promoting harmony. Man's laws = sh*t. Everytime Congress gets together nowadays,....I cringe wondering what piece of filth they are about to foist upon us without our consent or acceptance.

Anyway, I have to go but please be sensitive to the feelings of the woman, Gunslinger.

Look Seanus,...I understand that this woman is severely traumatized for life, truly I do. And I can understand someone wanting to be "rid" of being pregnant from such an evil occurence...

However,...I refuse to allow the emotionalism involved cause me to consent in my heart to the killing of that child. The child is not at all guilty. And there are so very many people who are willing to adopt a child,...a child born under any circumstances.

Inside her, was a little baby,...who knew nothing of the reason why it was there...but only knew its mother. That is why the people were gathered to try to stop this from happening. It was love.

I am so very tired of dealing with "choicers" that it makes me want to vomit. They are, bar none, the most selfish, evil lot of cretinous monsters that I have ever encountered. The women, because they are heartless and selfish, and hate their own womanhood,...and the men because they are irresponsible cowards who don't want a child getting in the way of their frail, putrid "success", new HDTV, car, bag of chips and fat disgusting belly full of food. Anything that takes their mind from football when they aren't at work, is the devil to them. They are fat, effeminate, swinish creatures,...who have forsaken their position of leadership, except when it concerns who controls the remote to the TV.
Gunslinger44   
30 Oct 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Again, the person who doesn't agree to this nonsense, is being accused of having no knowledge at all.

Well,...I am wrong? I cited that YOU said:

"For the first 12 weeks it's nothing - no foetus, no baby, nothing but a few cells that are splitting and splitting.

And then I stated some SCIENTIFIC FACTS that prove you are DEAD WRONG.

I think the evidence is damning, really.

And incidentally,...your cells are still splitting to this day. A newborn baby's cell are "splitting and splitting". It's called "growing", its what happens in LIFE. Death,...is what happens when masturbatory pseudo-intellectuals, such as yourself, reduce a living human being to scientific terminology. It makes it easier to kill them that way. To you, and to the masses of MTV drones who are too lazy to use their minds, let alone their hearts.

And I really like how you did not address a single point of mine. But only to spread some propaganda about Christianity being a brainwashed cult, and obsolete.

But you know what,...I took what you Godless heathen adore so much, Science, and I beat the sh*t out of you with it. God MADE Science, and you would try to use it against Him? Laugh! Tell me,...how does it feel?
Gunslinger44   
30 Oct 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

Hm, not even when those Ukrainians were killing them merrily? What is strange about your reasoning, is that you blame 1/3 of the Communist for everything the Commies did. I bet if it were Ukrainians who were 1/3 instead of Jews, it would be "those pore subjugated Ukrainians, they couldn't help but join the Commies."

It is not "strange reasoning". It is pure reason and rational thought. The Ukrainian does not hold hatred against the Pole, neither the Pole against the Ukrainian. Both are very agricultural nations,...and the people both very moral and God-fearing. (but no one is perfect, now are they?) Now, as to the Russian,...I know many Poles who still hold anger against Russians in general. This I do not blame them for.

Enter Bolshevism,...utterly raped, pillaged, plundered beautiful Russia,...then with blood on its fangs and lust in its eyes, turned on Russia's little neighbor, Ukraine. When this beast was done glutting itself upon the blood of Ukraine, the remaining people lived in such fear that the only hope for survival was subjugation. Did Ukrainians kill Poles? Yes. But not for nationalistic reason. Not for any "idealistic" reasons. Simply because they were in every way raped by Bolshevik Communism, and under its rule.

There were plenty of Jews who actually HELPED to gas to death their friends and neighbors. This was widespread in all the death-camps. Does this mean that Jews hate Jews? No. It is people, beaten down by horror and death all around.

That is not at all to excuse the Ukrainians who helped to kill anyone wrongly, Jew (there were many Ukrainians working in the death camps), Pole, or any.

And that is not the point. The point is that Bolshevism, Communism,...are JEWISH ideas, created by JEWS, loved by JEWS, and carried out largely....by JEWS! The proof in undeniable, fact-based, irrefutable.

So there you have it. The largest killer of human life in the 20th century; is Jewish Bolshevism.

Regardless of it being this same JewWatch (dumb name for a site) site, here are some more facts:

jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-Jewish-Bolshevism-Bolsheviks .html

And don't give me this "oh no, I won't read it, because blah blah" cop-out. Its just the facts. You're just afraid to face the music.

I kind of don't blame Jews for hiding this kind of stuff. It tends to cultivate anti-Jewish sentiment.
Gunslinger44   
29 Oct 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Do all these noble warriors of morality take care of the unwanted babies that are being born in this world? Hm, bet they're not at home when these come calling. Don't give me that religious bullcrap about how a person starts at the conception. It's nothing more than an eggcell that gets penetrated by a semen. For the first 12 weeks it's nothing - no foetus, no baby, nothing but a few cells that are splitting and splitting.

Yes. They do. I just told you that. I myself, as well as many others, have gien and continue t give out of our good fortune, to those in need, to include unwed mothers. Not to mention the fact we pay into Welfare, which does the same.

Careful, your brilliance is showing. It is scientific fact that personhood begins at conception. New DNA, hair color, eyes, personality. A new person. How did you think YOU started, anyway?

And "for first 12 weeks its nothing"? ARE YOU MENTALLY CHALLENGED? Or do you just normally bring half-baked ideas you've collected from the air, to a discussion such as this? Like bringing a knife to an international Thermonuclear show-down. Here's a medical fact for you: Baby's heart-beat begins 21 DAYS after conception. At 12 weeks the baby is kicking, about 2 inches long or so, and his or her kidneys are making pee.

It's the woman's body and it's up to her to decide what is happening to it. Not yours not some 2000 year old God who is not of this age anymore. Grow up and look around. It's a free world and ppl are free to do what they want.

Really, genius? Then tell me,...what part of the woman's body is the Fetus (which is Latin for "little one")? Tell me,...and no I don't need the medical term for what body part of HERS that baby is, just tell me in layman's terms (seems to be all you cn deal in anyway). Go on. What is the name of the WOMAN'S BODY PART, that is the baby?

Haha! You think that God is 2000 years old?

Who has done this and carried it through,
calling forth the generations from the beginning?
I, the LORD -with the first of them
and with the last—I am he." Isaiah 41:4


Yahweh is from the beginning, and He will be for all of eternity. Read the Bible.
Gunslinger44   
29 Oct 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

why don't you guys hate them as well? Why is it only the Jews?

Umm, who said anything about us hating Jews? This is a history lesson.

As to the Ukrainians,...they had already been thoroughly beaten-down with the Red Hammer, cut down with the sickle. It is estimated that 9 Million Ukrainian civilians died as direct result of Stalin's orchestrated famine against them. The famine was orchestrated by Lazar Kaganovitch, a Jew. Where do you ever hear of this 9 Million Ukrainians dying? You do not.

Christians were persecuted and murdered at the hands of communist Jews, in very large numbers,...Ukraine is just one shining example of this. Bolshevik-subjugated Ukraine was not even a shadow of the Ukraine she had once been, but she was thoroughly posessed by the demon of (Jew-created) Bolshevism. Poles know this, and is why they do not largely hate Ukrainians.
Gunslinger44   
29 Oct 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

So don't tell me that it's just because some of them joined the Communist Party. Some did, indeed, but the vast majority of members in ANY Communist Party of the world consisted of locals, not Jews.

"Some"? That is a heinous misrepresentation of the truth. Hoffman compiled a list (I don't know who's site it is, or their beliefs,...but Hoffman's research is entirely truthful and accurate to anyone who knows how to look for such info: jewwatch.com/jew-communists.html#anchor4458

My,...that's quite a lot of Jewish Communists,...isn't it...

To say that "maybe there's something to..." the concept that there at least "were" Bolshevik Jewish groups out to murder Christians en-masse,...would be a bold understatement.

Do you see how many Jews Stalin had working for him,...in various, specifically anti-Christian murderous capacities? But don't take Hoffman's word for it if you don't want to,...go do the research yourself.

Like I said, I love Jews. But Juda-ISM is nothing but evil, all the time. Ever look into Kabbalah? Ever read the Talmud, even just a little bit? Jews of Judaism are enemies of God, God even says so Himself! Just read through the prophets (all the books between Song of Songs, and Matthew) they were turning away,...to dark magic, to idols,...to their own "laws" which they put ABOVE God's Holy Law,...as is still the case today. The smart Jews turn to Christianity,...the REAL Israel. The foolish, wicked Jews, continue in their filth,...and keep suffering for it,...but instead of returning to God in repentance,...they become yet more rebellious!
Gunslinger44   
29 Oct 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

There is no proof whatsoever that the American or other European Jews made dealings with Hitler as far as not sending them over. They did get refused though, but that was mainly based on the fact that back then Germany was not at war with them yet and they didn't want to upset a "friendly" nation.

There are documents of correspondence between American Jewish groups and leaders of those under Nazi control. The Jews themselves did not want their own "over-running" the nations they made their home. They did not deal with Hitler direct, so far as I know, but this was years ago I read about this stuff,...and honestly it is a lot of information.

They did not get refused so as "not to upset a friendly nation". How would it "upset" Hitler, to be rid of the very people he had so desperately been TRYING to get rid of? That's not even a cop-out,...it plain don't make no sense. They wanted out because Hitler was tooling up to get rid of them in whatever way, and the Jewish leaders knew this, on both sides of the Atlantic. The Western Jews refused to help their own in deadly peril,...therefore the blood-guilt is also upon their own heads.
Gunslinger44   
29 Oct 2009
News / JEW YOUTH SHOULD CLEAN UP THEIR ACT IN POLAND [420]

I own a copy of "Mein Kampf". That doesn't make it fact-based.

No, it doesn't. But that fact that Hoffman's site has Talmud passages, which demonstrate how depraved and evil the Talmud's teachings really are, and I have the Talmud, and was able myself to look up and confirm that these passages are real, and in no way are misrepresented,...THAT is what makes it "fact-based".

If you were to state me a passage from Mein Kampf, verbatim,...and I owned Mein Kampf (I actually don't) and was then able to look up and confirm that it exists as-stated,...then your statement of the passage being in Mein Kampf,...would be a fact.