PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Posts by Mattewoflv  

Joined: 13 Jun 2008 / Male ♂
Last Post: 20 Apr 2009
Threads: -
Posts: Total: 8 / In This Archive: 7
From: New York City
Speaks Polish?: yes
Interests: Sailing, Scuba Diving, Football

Displayed posts: 7
sort: Oldest first   Latest first
Mattewoflv   
4 Jul 2008
News / Poland: the 51st state of America [119]

I saw someone state something about Kosciuszko turning in his grave because Poland has such good relations with America?

Well the history proves that Kosciuszko was one of the leading foreign generals that helped the Americans in many wars. He was infact used as a forign diplomat for America. So, if anyone Kosciuszko would be very happy to have Poland as a 51st state, since he was very very well respected in Poland and America, as he fought for American independece (as well as Polish).

However, at the end of his life, he left Poland because he couldnt take the fact that the Polish were divinding their own country up (partion), so he left to America, and I belive he die somehwere other then Poland, (his body was later moved back to Poland for burial)

So to make my point short, even tho the Poles are sometimes very anti-american. The new generation of Poles have been influced by American culture so much and so many Poles have moved to AMerica, that it wouldnt be hard for this 51st state to become true (if only the EU allowed for it hehe)
Mattewoflv   
19 Apr 2009
News / Racist text book for Polish schools [130]

Sokrates:
Sokrates

Are you tolerant towards people of different colour?

As is seen here blacksoul is a racist. You define people by color you are a racist, dont even try to argue against that. People are naturally racist and you cannot change that about them.You have a case of mild racism. Differently, extreme forms of racism is the worst since it destroys society.

Also, who needs to be Tolerant? How do you define Tolerance? If we define tolerance YOUR way than you will by default be INTOLERANT to other peoples values. This can happen because if your "TOLERANCE" prevents/destroys the majority of the values of the Poles than you yourself became a dictator of your values. You cannot be tolerant to the whole world, that is just a lack of culture, morals, character. Just because some European countries prefer the English/ American mode of "TOLERANCE" does not mean Poland has to. Throughout history Poland has ALWAYS had a different view of freedom than the Americans have. If you read the SECOND constitution (declaration of independence/democracy), which may i say was written by POLAND, than you will see how different Poles view freedom. It is very similar to what Poland is trying to do now. By no means is Poland obligated to follow some other peoples views on "Tolerance". Instead they follow a path of isolation and cultural preservation, which in turn helps in the right of self-preservation.

If Poland decides they want to have a Catholic country who likes to uphold traditional values, than geuss what? The Poles have the liberty to do so. If they deem that Islam is going to harm their people than Geuss what? They have the right to defend against that with Racism if needed.

Dont forget that since Racism is human nature it serves a purpose. That purpose is the categorize people so that your mind can make decisions quickly. This comes in handy when people are trying to avoid being killed in the pursuit of the right of Self- preservation.

Therefore, Even though extreme racism is bad, Basic forms of it exist and should be used when the environment deems it necessary.

As long as the Poles respect foreigners if foreigners respect them than I see no problem with them doing what they want. They are at liberty to do what they want!
Mattewoflv   
4 May 2009
News / Abortion - how is the Polish government going to deal with this issue? [273]

grethomory:
Something you were born with....it's yours to do with it what you want to....good or bad..it's yours....

When did "I" get the body exactly? Did I have to be 100% out of the birth canal before I had a body?

Good question, Awnser that one Grethormoy
Mattewoflv   
7 May 2009
News / Chairman of TVP flies the racist flag for Poland [51]

Lol Harry well you seem to act Jewish. Mabye its in your blood an you dont know it.

And btw, about your nation of bigots. I have not heard anything about this story. It really is a minor thing and so far your just making a rock out of sand.

you could have found many, more international comments, that are racist and more signifying than this guy who said monkey which is clearly a slander used as a general slur, NOT AS A RACIST ONE.

You live in Poland right? So you should know that monkey is not a racist comment but a word to describe someone that is stupid.

Just because people take things out of cultural context does not mean anything.
Mattewoflv   
9 Jul 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Putting aside rape and health problems

If that female does not want to have that "parasite" in her, than she shouldn't let a device such as the male reproductive system dispel live "parasite" sperm anywhere near her! So let me think... whatever sexual actions this girl is doing there is a mutual agreement of pleasure here. With your logic the male sperm and the female egg makes up 50/50 parasites. Therefore everyone has a parasite inside them... Unless they have their reproductive organs cut out.. Harry do you have your organs cut out? I mean If you have your ball sack on you than you have half of a parasite in you right?

Anyways, so when the couple engages in sexual matters they are dealing with their own parasites (according to Harry's Mentality). When a male releases his sperm, its because the girl initiated this right? Therefore, Mr. harry Your definition of Parasite is Flawed. Because this interaction is a mutual ism, WHERE BOTH PARTIES BENEFIT. Dont forget the fetus is half the mans and half the womans.

If the female becomes impregnated, the 50% of the male and 50% of the woman make up 100%. And alas, (if we continue Harry's thought process) we have a parasite inside the woman! But it was not the fetus's choice to implant itself in the uterus was iT?!?! IT was the mutual agreement of pleasure that both parents had. Therefore the fetus cant be a dam parasite because it never had ambitions to "suck the blood" of the mother. This fetus was put onto this world, if he/she wanted it or not. Moreover, with your ideas Harry, you can very easily say that the mother is being the parasite when it does an abortion. The Fetus is an innocent human being, no choices made. The mother has a choice and her choice is to deprive the child of life, therefore making the mother a parasite!!

If a female engages in any sexual behaviors, (which are natural) than this sexual behavior is not for pleasure at all. This sexual behavior is an action to make Baby's! The final cause or creation of sex is not for pleasure but for procreation! Since society portrays sex as a pass-time, what you have is couples who are irresponsible, aborting babys because they are too stupid or ignorant to understand what sex is. Sorry but if anybody is surprised they get pregnant if they engage in SEX, IS PLAIN STUPID!! You Have Sex, You face the consequences. Without this principle society can never run, because all we would have is immature citizens!

Mateusz
Mattewoflv   
11 Jul 2009
News / 14 year old rape victim from Warsaw denied abortion! [348]

Wow Darius some solid points there :O

i want to see some pro-abortionist respond to that.

May I add that Biology greatly leans towards a fetus actually being a living, thinking, being...