News /
March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]
BBoy, I am disappointed with you and all those who are so stubborn about the whole "homosexuality predates this and that and yet humanity didn't die". Since I am responsible for bringing the survival of the species aspect of homosexuality forward I feel I need to make sure it gets through the all those minds resistant to logic, and frankly, understanding of simple words.
Sorry that I disappointed you, that wasn't my intent! :(
But belittling your adversaries when your arguments aren't accepted won't help you
or your position...
Homeosexuality obviously has not cause extintion of human beings, and possibly of no other species. Perhaps it will never cause it, perhaps it will. I simply do not want to argue about the future because no matter how much material we have, predicting future is good for the nostradamuses of this world.
Why looking in the future?
One main argument of homo-haters is that it's unnatural because it goes against the instincts of species preserveration and reproduction.
If it would be the case research would have been able to find some species who died out because of excessive homosexuality by now, don't you think so too?
But they didn't, no such case is known!
The point where I mention that survival of the species shows how homosexuality is an aberrant behavior is only to illustrate the point. The purpose of sexual intercourse in humans (on biological level) is procreation. Homosexual intercourse does not fulfill this requirement. Hence, it is against life. The use of organs in homosexual relations results from mistaken sexual identity. MISTAKEN, i.e. not expected, i.e. not normal.
Life means sex? Even animals are affectionate with each other without having sex.
Other arguments that I cannot call by names other than silly (not to use stronger words) are : homosexuals are naturally the way they are. So is cancer, ebola, HIV, bubonic plague etc. Just like homosexuality, they occur in nature naturally, none of those caused the extinction of the human race, and yet a person with one or more of those conditions is considered sick.
No...YOU consider it sick like a disease...you and other mostly religious people.
Many people do not!
In big parts during mankind's history people didn't care much about homosexuality either way...only the churches made it a crime! But that time is nearly over anyhow as churches are losing their importance...
Similarly, rapists are just the way they are, so are murderers, thieves. None of these caused anywhere close to an extinction of human race so they should be considered OK.
The difference being CONSENT!
As long as two grown ups are both on the same level they can and should do what they want...a rapist or a pedophile should lose his nuts or worse if I had a say!
I am not comparing gays to murderers, and I hope it is clear that I am merely ridiculing the automatic acceptance of a status just because that status exists. After all the reality was such that homosexual relationships were illegal in the UK not such a long time ago. That was the reality, i.e. things were the way they were. Anybody willing to protest the changes gay movement forced? If so, why not accept the anti-gay movement? If so, why make any changes at all? Why kill bacteria? They have feeling, you know? ;)
The status of homosexuality being taboo and called a bad thing people need to be cured of (or being prayed for) is the unatural thing! It should be corrected!
And again, as for the touchy feely comments, nature does not care about feelings. When a human body is consumed by cancer it is not a pretty sight. A person looks terrible, ugly, terrible stench is sometimes present and above all it hurts for long periods of time.
As does rough sex? :):):)
There is also a lot of hurt every time we have fun and some meat is present during a feast. Animals are killed but most do not think twice about that. (no, I am not a tree hugger, and I do eat meat).
Nature is not to be confused with some big hug that's meant to make us feel good. It's a system that is neither good, nor bad, pretty or ugly. It just is. The living, bilogical part of nature exists and continues to exist because individuals give life to new individuals. Homosexuals, in their pure form, are incapable of this. This the nature of homosexuality is against life, but not necessarily a major, nor even minor, contributor to any possible dangers of the extinction of the human species.
So then why do you have a problem with homosexuality? It's the same - it just is!
A side note, perhaps Marches of Tolerance for gays and lesbians should be accompanied, or followed by Marches of Tolerance for families. You know what I mean? The old fashion way where there is a mother an father and children and they are the real and primary providers of all needs of their offspring, insted of allowing the TV and youtube to do the job?
I'm all for support for families, especially for children!
But as in nature homos aren't responsible for the extinction of a species they are not responsible for the fate of families!
And to conclude....homos are such a tiny percentage, they don't hurt anybody, they are not to blame for the plague, for the rain today or for the financial crisis...why not just let them be!