PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Posts by Bratwurst Boy  

Joined: 2 Apr 2007 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 27 Nov 2024
Threads: Total: 8 / In This Archive: 2
Posts: Total: 11834 / In This Archive: 3273
From: Berlin, Germany
Speaks Polish?: No
Interests: his helmet

Displayed posts: 3275 / page 69 of 110
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Bratwurst Boy   
26 Oct 2008
News / Dealing with constant insults against Polish [323]

I was only referring to those Germans that Hitler was referring to that did not want to assimilate into Poland. If they assimilated totally into Poland then Hitler would not have used them as an excuse to invade Poland to "protect them" against the Poles. Assimilated Germans in Poland would not need "protection" by Hitler

Well...why didn't the Poles assimilate totally during the partitions?
The millions of dead later would have been avoided...
Bratwurst Boy   
26 Oct 2008
History / Where did the stereotype of Polish people being stupid come from? [131]

Germans were jealous of the Poles. Polish culture evolved faster, with democracy and Spiritual focus.

Erm...you are catholics!!!

One poster thinks Germans hate Poles, the next one says Germans are jealeous of Poles...you really seem to think the sun turns around Poland only, don't you? :):):)
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

Well...borders changed all the time in history...
Who knows about borders in hundred years from now...:)
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

Prove it! We only have your word for that... :)

Here! *waves Bratwurst at Shelley* See?

:):):)
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

Oh pleaaaseee...you are just obsessed with military Germany!
And it isn't a tongue breaker like "Przyjaźń"! How do you get that out of your mouth???

You definitely need more vowels...
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

bratwurst is a good name for some kind of military heavy equipment [:

...and MY Bratwurst is the best! :):):)

The Polish for Munchen is Monachium.

"Monachium" is polish??? Are you sure? Sounds latin to me...
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

There isn't much difference phonetically....
Bratwurst Boy   
23 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

Holland is lost...such a mud of foreigners now, who would want it back!

The Teutons may never have 'dominated' Poznań, however, practically every major (and even some minor) Polish cities or towns still bear historical German place names given them by their supposed 'conquerors', e.g. "Poznań" = Posen etc.....

And??? What's your beef with that?
The german names are much nicer than the polish ones...just compare the nice sounding "Breslau" to the polish "Wrotzwaw"...puleeeze!

:)
Bratwurst Boy   
22 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

"God hates fags"???

How would they know....what a stupid poster. Really reinvents all my prejudices I have about christians (and muslims)!
Bratwurst Boy   
21 Oct 2008
History / Where did the stereotype of Polish people being stupid come from? [131]

I'm not paranoid, you kraut. I'm just stating a fact.

Okay...we detest you...we can't stand you....you are all just blah!

Feel better now?

:):):)

I'm curious, what is your purpose on this forum? I don't think you live in poland and are clearly not polish. Have you ever even been to poland?

Well...my family lived for centuries in Silesia!
My ancestors are buried in this soil...
Of course I have a huge interest in the development of the once border territory...

And on the other hand Germany is such a big part and such a recurring object of discussions one german voice is absolutely needed here! :)

A canuck as you has which reason to be on this board?
Bratwurst Boy   
21 Oct 2008
History / Where did the stereotype of Polish people being stupid come from? [131]

I'm not sure how the germans view other nationalities, but poles are treated poorly.

Well, didn't hinder millions of Poles in the last hundred years to come over and settle here...they still do! Why should we hate you??? Don't you think we have better things to do? What's so special about you?

Is the "We poor victimized Poles"-paranoia kicking in again??? Do you like that so much???
Bratwurst Boy   
20 Oct 2008
History / Where did the stereotype of Polish people being stupid come from? [131]

Germans do hold a lot or responsibility though.

crap not true

Agreed!

Where are the dumb-russian jokes then? Or the "insert any enemy of the Nazis"-dumb jokes??? Why should the Germans have singled out the Poles and busied themselves with inventing jokes about you?

Conclusion: Crap theory!
Bratwurst Boy   
19 Oct 2008
History / Drang nach Osten. [79]

Well...what about polish "Drang nach Westen"???
The whole of today Germany/Poland was once the realm of germanic tribes. Now look at the history...you came and came and shoved and pushed and came and shoved and pushed!

Germans were only taking back what belongs to them!

Just my two cents to that so not controversial thread....there are undeniable facts that WE WERE HERE FIRST!

Today, seventeen years or so following German reunification, Poland is still demanding from a reuinted Germany that certain former occupied areas be "returned" to Poland,

Erm....and which ones??? I never heard of that....

that German school books kindly NOT refer to Gdańsk, Bydgoszcz, Olsztyn, Szczecin etc. as Danzig, Bromberg, Allenstein and Stettin-:)

Why not?
First the english refer to Nürnberg as Nuremburg for example but most importantly no germanic tongue survives a "Bydgoszcz", a "Olsztyn", or a "Szczecin"!

...and anyway...now everybody can go and live where he wants. Isn't the EU just great? :)

*leaves thread bored*

PS:

Don't cry Würstel (BB) you are not alone:

There is no need to cry anymore....:):):)
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

I do not have a problem with homosexuality at all. I am not homosexual, neither do I care whether homosexuals exist or not.

Well...the most sensible thing I read all day....
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

(not that homo is right... but I get why so big messeges)

I really doubt you get any thing....dude!
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

BBoy, I am disappointed with you and all those who are so stubborn about the whole "homosexuality predates this and that and yet humanity didn't die". Since I am responsible for bringing the survival of the species aspect of homosexuality forward I feel I need to make sure it gets through the all those minds resistant to logic, and frankly, understanding of simple words.

Sorry that I disappointed you, that wasn't my intent! :(
But belittling your adversaries when your arguments aren't accepted won't help you
or your position...

Homeosexuality obviously has not cause extintion of human beings, and possibly of no other species. Perhaps it will never cause it, perhaps it will. I simply do not want to argue about the future because no matter how much material we have, predicting future is good for the nostradamuses of this world.

Why looking in the future?
One main argument of homo-haters is that it's unnatural because it goes against the instincts of species preserveration and reproduction.
If it would be the case research would have been able to find some species who died out because of excessive homosexuality by now, don't you think so too?

But they didn't, no such case is known!

The point where I mention that survival of the species shows how homosexuality is an aberrant behavior is only to illustrate the point. The purpose of sexual intercourse in humans (on biological level) is procreation. Homosexual intercourse does not fulfill this requirement. Hence, it is against life. The use of organs in homosexual relations results from mistaken sexual identity. MISTAKEN, i.e. not expected, i.e. not normal.

Life means sex? Even animals are affectionate with each other without having sex.

Other arguments that I cannot call by names other than silly (not to use stronger words) are : homosexuals are naturally the way they are. So is cancer, ebola, HIV, bubonic plague etc. Just like homosexuality, they occur in nature naturally, none of those caused the extinction of the human race, and yet a person with one or more of those conditions is considered sick.

No...YOU consider it sick like a disease...you and other mostly religious people.
Many people do not!
In big parts during mankind's history people didn't care much about homosexuality either way...only the churches made it a crime! But that time is nearly over anyhow as churches are losing their importance...

Similarly, rapists are just the way they are, so are murderers, thieves. None of these caused anywhere close to an extinction of human race so they should be considered OK.

The difference being CONSENT!
As long as two grown ups are both on the same level they can and should do what they want...a rapist or a pedophile should lose his nuts or worse if I had a say!

I am not comparing gays to murderers, and I hope it is clear that I am merely ridiculing the automatic acceptance of a status just because that status exists. After all the reality was such that homosexual relationships were illegal in the UK not such a long time ago. That was the reality, i.e. things were the way they were. Anybody willing to protest the changes gay movement forced? If so, why not accept the anti-gay movement? If so, why make any changes at all? Why kill bacteria? They have feeling, you know? ;)

The status of homosexuality being taboo and called a bad thing people need to be cured of (or being prayed for) is the unatural thing! It should be corrected!

And again, as for the touchy feely comments, nature does not care about feelings. When a human body is consumed by cancer it is not a pretty sight. A person looks terrible, ugly, terrible stench is sometimes present and above all it hurts for long periods of time.

As does rough sex? :):):)

There is also a lot of hurt every time we have fun and some meat is present during a feast. Animals are killed but most do not think twice about that. (no, I am not a tree hugger, and I do eat meat).

Nature is not to be confused with some big hug that's meant to make us feel good. It's a system that is neither good, nor bad, pretty or ugly. It just is. The living, bilogical part of nature exists and continues to exist because individuals give life to new individuals. Homosexuals, in their pure form, are incapable of this. This the nature of homosexuality is against life, but not necessarily a major, nor even minor, contributor to any possible dangers of the extinction of the human species.

So then why do you have a problem with homosexuality? It's the same - it just is!

A side note, perhaps Marches of Tolerance for gays and lesbians should be accompanied, or followed by Marches of Tolerance for families. You know what I mean? The old fashion way where there is a mother an father and children and they are the real and primary providers of all needs of their offspring, insted of allowing the TV and youtube to do the job?

I'm all for support for families, especially for children!
But as in nature homos aren't responsible for the extinction of a species they are not responsible for the fate of families!

And to conclude....homos are such a tiny percentage, they don't hurt anybody, they are not to blame for the plague, for the rain today or for the financial crisis...why not just let them be!
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

It's rather ironic tp hear that from the man whose people dies out. Yeah... I mean Germans (as well as Russians)...

Quality instead of Quantity! :)
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

Just because it puts an end to your family (procreation).

To swarm the environment till it suffocates isn't "natural" either.
That would happen if every living being would only think of getting babies as much and often as possible!
Just take it as natural population control...:)

I could understand that line of thinking with an endangered species...but not with humans.
And I really doubt that in history an animals species where homosexuality also is quite "normal" ever died out because of that and not rather because the ever growing population of humans destroying his environment or just killed it to the last.
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

Not sick... What is homosexuality then? How would you call it? "Different way of perception of a beauty" or what? :)

Why not?
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

That wasn't the question Sasha!
You made it sound as if gayness is something contagious...I just wanted to make sure!:)

and than pray for them.

Yup...as if god had no other problems!
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

It could be. Just think of your kids beholding such "parties". It would inevitably affect or infect them. It's said that only part of gays are gays by nature.

You want to say that it could hapen that I go to a party with the wish tho stick my d'ick into a girl and come out with the urge to stick my d'ick into an man???
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

I'm personally ok with them as long as they don't affect or "infect" naturals (or "straight" as it's said in english).

You think it's "infectious"?

I don't care if people are gay, but why do you have to have a freakin parade everywhere in the world announcing it?

Well...this discussion here shows why they feel the need to do so.
If it wouldn't be a such a hotly discussed topic there wouldn't be a parade...
Bratwurst Boy   
17 Oct 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]

There is one cultural norm... one traditional norm...and the other 'natural norm'. The natural norm is same. And the natural norm is our refuge... but maybe its difficult for some people to understand.

Well...mother nature has never had a problem with gays!
Or else homosexuality would really never exist in the first place, not between animals and not between humans...

But it were only always some humans who made it a problem...mostly religious types...says all, not hard to understand at all!

That, of course, is an uninformed statement. Homosexual relationship were accepted, and even encouraged in ancient Greece and Rome. Both cultures were deeply religious..

Okay...I didn't want to spell it out so clearly but the christian religion, as of course Islam and Judaism too - the so called "book religions" aren't the epitome on intolerance not for nothing!

They worked hard for centuries to earn that label...

So when people speak of religious prejudice they very rarely mean the old greeks...

Generalized spoken...the demonization of homosexuality started with the rising of these religions and it will end with them.
(But we can already see that most secular, non-religious people of today have no problems with gay's at all...that number is rising).

And no...mankind won't die out because of that! :)