PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Posts by truhlei  

Joined: 15 Jul 2007 / Male ♂
Last Post: 29 Sep 2007
Threads: Total: 10 / In This Archive: 7
Posts: Total: 332 / In This Archive: 276
From: Moscow Russia
Speaks Polish?: no unfortunately
Interests: Szlachta Militia Majestas

Displayed posts: 283 / page 5 of 10
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

As to Gasprom, that is another western idiotism. Monopoly is always dangerous. Competitive gas pipelines from Central Asia should exist. Nobody should trust even a loal Gasprom if it is Monopoly. The comparison with Microsoft is quite evident.

But is that Russian duty to construct alternative pipelines? Why there are no real steps? Only discussions. Since 90.

'90s were after '80. It is quite important think you should notice. You were to weak to protest we join NATO.

We are discussing gentleman agreement of 1989 violation. Without pardons and compensations. The violation that may justify retaliation.

We can discuss about everything, but we all know what kind of game Putin is playng right now ...

Are you really sure?
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Figures, no body gave us any figures. It is just natural choice to do business with developed countries. But I m sure that we have chosen good way. Some things we could do better, but all in all our situation isnt bad.

It is not bad in Russia now. Average salary of USD 500. 7% annual growth.
As to Poland and Baltic states, the EU potential was hardly enough to admit these former socialist states. Russia was isolated. Despite the gentleman agreement tha Nato won't expand, the expansion took place. NATO thought Russia was unable to protest by being weak. Now Russia can do much because USA have problems in Iraq-Iran and also can't protest. We had good teachers of cinical approach and pragmatism.

Now we meet the results of such isolation. That could be a better way for the West to spend all force in Russia. States between the West and Russia in this case wouldn't have any other way than to the West even without any help. That wasn't done. That is not my fault as well as the fault of those near me/ Western leaders had more possibiliries to influence within Russia in 90 than we, the ordinary Russians. We don't want to listen to these idiots again.

You should put on the table what you can give and what do you want to take ...

From the West Russians want to take only the right to travel without visas. As to economic relations, they seem to be more profitable with Asia.

What to give in exchange - that depends upon the West. As to butaforic bombers, they can be back without any problem/ As to the rest of demands, I don't know them.

I feel that our discussion doesnt stick to reality. because the reallity looks like that:

bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markmardell

Oyr discussion sticks precisely to this reality. What Russia must do and what can it get in exchange. Something for common understanding.
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Honestly your Economy in isolation or with the partenrs like Mongolia or Turkmenistan ... will lost in long term.

Russia has many contacts with different Nations. No embargo in relations with Japan, North Korea, China and many, many other states. Know-how penetrates from all these countries and Russia has today 7 per cent of annual growth.

As to EU states there are lots of contacts and quite a good investments into Russian Economy. The West isn't interested in Russian isolation but if that occures, there is still Asia.

Do you think making threads to some EU members, killing others citizens, embargo to others is a good way for Russia.

That is a world practice. Iraq is one of such examples and Russian policy is quite moderated and limited. The majority of humanity is of the same opinion.

So it is in your business to have good relationship with whole EU, when you have some arguments. Later again nobody will belive you ... (like in '90).

Nobody believes anybody in business or politics. Only today interest rules.
If Russia becomes weak nobody will take into consideration its past loyalty.
If Russia represents interest the West will forgive much (not all, but look: Russia isn't so cruel now).
The West has contacts with Pakistan. What about its loyalty to western values?

You have your gas and petrol but every year there are more and more technologies which will make it just another coal. For example there are cars on hydrogen

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_vehicle

Now it is more expensive than your gas but in close future ...

In close future only efficient Electric Vehicles are possible. Electricity also requires gas because there are few Nuclear Power Stations in Europe (except France).
Much may change to 2025 but humanity will have less expensive goods in general by that period. Russians will need less money to live in good conditions as well as the rest of the world.

Look:
Gas engine with gearbox and injector are all of some USD 2000. For resource of some 150 000 km.
Electric motor for 1.5 million km (!) is of some USD 150-200.
IF EV appear Russians will loose smth on gas but cars for them will become less expensive.

I m not going to beg you to become EU partner ... honestly it is in your business. Look how do (more or less) isolated countries develope ... and how do it countries with free market. We have some expierience, we have given our 38 mln market to explor by western comapnies, they opened their market for us. Import and Export increased about 23% (in 2006) so it was good deal for both sides.

The same thing occures in China. Nobody pays attention to its behaviour. The same thing with many other states. I don't think the West is able to impose different rules to Russia.

If you think any new possibilities can appear. More possibilities than Russia has today, please talk about them with figures. If it is more profitable than today Russian behaviour, I'm sure Russians will change their mind.

Now you only mention smth. mentioned 20 years ago.
It is a good way to have a detailed discussion.

There would be more tourists in your country

Lots of tourists in Egypt despite low democratic lewel.
Few tourists to Russia in any case. Russia doesn't represent by its cold seas a great interest to mass visitors.
No reason to change relations with the west.

When your reputation increase you can get a lot of concessions ... which would satisfy your citizens, stronger your economy. You could get some know-how ...

Facts and figures are required. You are 20 years late. Such dreams are only for Homo Soveticus. Who will trust again and again?

It is just better to be open, and in my opinion West is the best choice for Russia, but to get status of special partnership it is important to met some criteria.

It is clear. Only one question: What can I get fron special partnership (some first 1000 benefits for society) and what are these criteria (some 1000 points). Russian siciety didn't receive these two lists. Have you ever seen them?

Those criteria are good thing for Russia citizens as well : human rights, more domocracy, free market ...

More democracy? What are the new democratic provisions I need the West can impose here?
Human rights? What kind of my human rights EU is able to defend. I'm not Chechen rebel. I'm not criminal. I'm middle classer. The West will impose tax reduction? No, because western people pay much to support lumpens. The EU will defend my right to receive information? I have this right using Internet. My authorities promote Internet to province, to all schools etc.

EU will help me to stop the expansion of secret service. military or law enforcement bodies officers and their relatives and clients? In what way if it is still in action even in EU states such as Poland (see Jaro Kaczynski speech on anticommunism in Sorbona).

Smth like Pospolitoje Ruszenje or US militias of states is required for that in today Russia. I have never heard such advices from the West.

There is a question if Putin wants it, In my opinion he has other vison of your country ...

He subordinated his activities to common Russian opinion. The opinion that the West isolates Russia and it is more profitable to limit political subordination to the west is registered by Lewada Center since 1994-95.
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

trade barers, you could get some concessions for your products ... quite important thing.

Which concessions?
1. Russia doesn't find it easy to be in competition with China in export. If Russia is able to do that later it won't require concessions. If not, protectionism won't save Russia by being quite limited.

2. Russia is more interested in export to developping states. Such states don't impose their rules as EU. They welcome disidents.

Well, have you heard about any figures concerning concessions potential profit? I haven't. Doesn't it seem strange that the West doesn't mentiones about that?

Traveling/students exchange. Just right now our citizens takes oportunity to travel throught the Europe, a lot of young people are going for student exchanges to EU countries.

This also exists despite collisions. EU needs Russian readmission activities. So it has to open its territory to these classes of Russians. If EU putd obstacles Russia will stop fighting against ilegal imigrants transite.

So the EU has already sold its permition to travel in exchange of readmition.
Russians are sometimes idiots but it is uneasy to sell them twice the same thing
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Ehhh Russians and Germans nothing new ... but even Germans last time pretends to not beeing seen as your man in EU ...

Few Russians think Germany is its representative in EU. The point is that sympathies exist despite current relations. Russians are good to ordinary Americans and internal US civilization despite the conflicts between states.

What do you think, you will make embargo on Poland, other economical sanctions for some EU contries, and ther will be no reaction ...

No, I don't think so. I think West reaction doesn't frightens Russia. Nobody looses here anything while EU reacts

I m sure Russia has chosen way on which all in all will lost ...

Details please. What can Russia loose? Reputation in EU? Is it profitable to have reputation in Europe?

Maybe it is quite hard to notice on this forum (Brat Wurst isnt representative for germany), but there are more and more signs that EU will hold (more or less) but one line in relationships with you.

How can I suffer from this line? What can I, the man in the street, ordinary Russian loose? Explain it to me, to other Russians and we will change our mind

EU now stoped some of your investements just because you have chosen your own way ...

I didn't invest anything. As to Russia in general, it can survive without these investments. Some adecuate and limited measures against EU and gas-money exchange goes on.

More investments in Russian economy.

Russia GDP is about Holand and Belgium GDP so Russia isnt so strong as pretends to be.

I don't pretend to be strong. That is the imperialist past.
I pretend to be invulnerable. I pretend to gain profits. The West doesn't propose any good profits or benefits.
You are of different opinion. Well explain it to me.

In my opinion your isolation (you will see it in nearest future) is your own choice.

Russians felt isolation in 90. Any western measures today won't permit Russians to feel it in the same degree today.
As to choice, Russia voted in favour of pro-west orientation in 90.
It may vote again but only if you show benefits.

Dont be surprised when Polish general will become head of NATO commiete with German support ...

Do you really think such prospect can frighten Russians?

Ehhh Russians and Germans nothing new ...

Many new things. No imperialism. No agression.
Only business.

Russia in EU is just not posible !!!

It isn't possible forever!!!
EU isn't the organization of high industrial states as it was before. Many poor relatives appeared. Russia won't receive anything by participating in such organization.

Only special relations are possible. Russia will keep loyal to EU and open more spheres for western polititians ans businessmen. If EU invents profitable proposals.

Nobody is going to respect EU by the only reason of its existence.
Russia had good and pragmatic teachers in the West.
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

But there is the other option, you just want to get some influence on countries which belonged to your emipre in the past.

Yes there are old fashioned people in Russia and by low demographic lewel the percentage of old and conservative people is too high. They are thinking about their youth when they were stronger. They have sometimes a romantic view on Soviet superpower not because they are imperialists but by the reason they were younger some 30 years ago. That is quite common with all old people.

Authorities have to take that into account because they are voters. But in general Russian authorities try to get rid of expensive friends abroad. Today Belarus is one of such examples.

The best way to destroy superpower ilusions is to show that "friends" are parasits. That each Russian can gain more if Russia doesn't have dependent states. That enemies are more inexpensive than friends.

But USA and EU don't help Russian authorities in such propaganda. They state that Ukraine should be dotated by Russia and pay for gas 2-3 times less than Poland. Nobody took care of Poland in early 90 when world gas prices were established although the internal Polish situation seemed to be a real disaster. Ukranians today have an average salary of some USD 250-300 and world prices may signify only some USD 15 of reduction only. You see very few Ukranians want to pay 15 dollars for independence and they are supported by the West.

Do you think it is easy to persuade any Russian that the loss of "friends" is profitable if the West requires for them both freedom and dotations?

Your regime fits you by stories like this

That is not the regime. That is the most liberal and proeuropean Russian singer in 90 Oleg Gasmanow. He is the example of dissapointment it the West.

What is more he provokes other countries, and when they react he is showing him self as good boy form this story. And you think you need him.

1. Nobody provokes Ahtisaari to impose Kosovo independense despite the agreement with Serbija. That may create a bad precedent and Russia is afraid. That may awake some extremists who want to declare Abhasia and Osetia independence from Georgia and Russia will have to pay for their liberty. That was the western idea about Kosovo.

2. What are the USA and some European states doing in Iraq? Did Russia provoke Iraq occupation?

All you need is democracy, and Russia is going in other direction.

All we need for today are moral and money.
Nobody is interested in democracy in misery and accompanied by gay manifestations.
Money was the main idea of Russian politicians and businessmen supported by the West in 90 when Russia was weak. Their activities were highly estimated by western politicians despite they thought about profits only, not about liberty.

Why are you astonished when the rest of Russians also want to have a share of profits and don't think about democracy?
Why are you astonished that Russians become anti-west when they notice that profits are possible without west orientation?
Are you sure democracy will mean anything even in the West if living standards go down?

So thats why for example he is not going to solve problem of Kaliningrad, because unsolved issue of visas for Kaliningrad citizens makes his regime more popular.

There were many attempts to solve Kaliningrad challenge. But EU never proposed a regime similar to West Berlin visitation by West Europeans.

All you need is democracy, and Russia is going in other direction.

The new law adopted following Putin's initiative permits only parties' lists at parlamentary elections. That creates a basis for strong pluralism.
Russian authorities don't create obstacles for internet access. That defends the right to receive information more than any other legal provisions.
There are prospects for more freedom but it is quite uneasy to create a free society in a state separated from the West. Russia has to make all the way toward free society using its own force only. The west has a reputation of non-profitable adviser.

As to relations between Poland and Russia, I don't see any prospects for today.
Poland taken separately from EU isn't mentioned by Russian mass media. The man in the street think a pure Europe begins away from Poland. Poland is only Kresy of EU. A poor relative of western Europeans.

Germany is the symbol of western civilization for today Russians.

As to East EU members in general...
Well, Russia is more interested in their hostility.
Russians (note: of different political views) are going to persuade the West that its special attention to these states accompanied by isolation of Russia in 90 lead to Russian inverability. And that possible problema with Turkish state is also of the same nature.

Sooner or later the West will look for the reasons of its disasters in relations with the rest of the world. Such idea will be up to day. Russians are away and Poles are near. That is a common rule that punishment is not for guilty but for those nearby.

Such activities are more profitable than improvement of relations. For today at least. In situation when obsolete approaches governs.
Poland may reject such prospects only by inventing new clever initiatives.
Please comment on my low-cost post. That seems to be relevant

Lukasz, please answer: Which new profits besides money for gas Russia can receive from the West.
Why should the man in the street be interested in good relations with the West.
No demonstration of that view appeared in Russia in 90. But there were many mistakes commited by EU as well as Russia.
Well...
Let us try again. But what about benefits? What about proposals. What about interests of ordinary Russians. Do you imagine such interest? I don't.

Read this article published in Guardian
guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2171414,00.html
truhlei   
20 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

I think that deals like everything or nothing, or relationships like Love or Hate. Are so typical for our region

As to visas, nobody requires an inmediate solution. The point is that EU doesn't even proposes a clear visa ban programme for at least 10 (!) years, that may include strict mutual obligations.

... ehhh but I see Russians have chosen (or rather Putin) option: "if they dont want us we dont need them..."

Quite a logical conclusion for a state that can survive without obedience to western rules. I don't think Russia is the only EU neighbour that started travelling away from the West. Turkish state is going to act in the same way after East European countries were admitted to EU and Tirkish people weren't despite 40 years of attempts to integrate.

Your country reputation is very weak, Europe decided to stop your expansion in EU (Gazprom investemnts).

Russia has field ror retaliation measures within its own territory. Many Endowments already felt that retaliation.

We all know the western countries are not going to invade Russia, you have to sell gas/petrol for Europe. We have noticed you are quite worried about China, you try to show you with them as an ally. But we all know about you are more woried about China than europe or USA ...

Not so for today. That is quite an obsolete stereotype.
Russia has good relations with China and we are interested in business with that state.
It is uneasy to imagine the motives for possible China invasion.
But even if it is possible, EU won't help Russia. So Russia doesn't have more interests in EU than in China.

You need west, you feel part of European civilization, so maybe it would be much easier to play using western rules.

That is the greates mistake.
Nobody needs EU as symbol only. European history, culture of previous centuries are in books we all can read. To live according to 10 testaments is the best way to feel yourself a part of European civilization.

As to western rules today they correspond to traditional western civilization less than today Russia.
There are Russians that don't think much about 10 testaments.
But they also think that to play despite western rules is the best and shortest way to feel part of civilization. I.E. to gain money, money and once more money. Civilization is for those who can buy it. Every day such people see confirmation of this idea.

Russians could see what type of people was promoted within the state during all 90 under western protection. No ilusions about plyying western rules and feeling part of civilization.
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

you show it in TV, our relationships become better, and you can stop embargo without thread your society will consider your goverment move as capitulation ...

Lukasz, Russian government isn't afraid such capitulatior image in case of Polish meat.
Some 95 per cent of Russians don't even keep in their memory the meat embargo. If it is declared that embargo is over, 95 per cent will forget it next day.

Nobody knows real reasons of that embargo but it is not the question of mass interest. People think they can gain nothing from EU countries except gas-money exchange routine. That's why people aren't anxious about problems in relations with any EU state.

Only if a nice proposals appear in the West but in exchange of improved relations and more western penetration, Russian society will start thinking.
As to free travel for Kaliningrad residents and people from 50 km zone, that's good for a very reduced number. The rest will stay indifferent.

Don't try to offend Jaro. Anything but not my beloved Jaro.

He is better than the majority of European politicians. But so unexperienced.
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Please pay attention to my question.
I didn't ask what is on in Russia. I only asked why should I the Russian take into account EU opinions if I get nothing from these countries, even travel without visa.
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Money doesn't interest Russians who go abroad (if it is between some 10-30 euro. The main challenge is that a Russian has right to travel without any permission as we travel to Turkish state, Syria, Egypt and soon to Israel.

As to 50 km... Each West European could go to West Berlin through GDR territory, not only those who lived some 50 km from GDR border.

There is the rule: EU opened - Russia dependent.
EU closed - Russia independent.
Why should I pay attention to the opinion of states that give me permition to visit them if there are lots of states I can travel without visa and that don't express their opinion on Russian policy?
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

This proposal is always on the table. And Poland was never the initiator of visa regime as well as Bulgaria, Romania, Cyprus or Slovakia. But it is nor sufficient for EU.

Please pay attention to my low-cost post
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

My opinion is that benefits Russia requires can be given only by EU in general. The main is the right to travel without visa. But as for today it is impossible to reach even Kaliningrad by car without visa. Smth worse than West Berlin status before 1989.

For that benefit many problems can be solved
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Everybody already knows that. But what can the West do with Russia? As to Poland... Well, can do everything.

I didn't write Russia has a good reputation. I wrote only that Russia doesn't depend upon its reputation in such grade as Poland
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Some countries have higher leaders than Jaro Koczynski. These leaders know how to provoke Jaro to veto non significant Russia - EU treaties by banning Polish meat import.

A gratuite step because meat is abundant in world market. And East European EU members gain a reputation of scandalists within the EU.
truhlei   
19 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Today is the most favorable period in Russian history of the last 100 years.
Only imagine that Russia has more gas profits than the former Soviet Union in 70 but without arms race, expensive "friends" all over the world and even some 40 per cent of former Soviet population.

That is not forever but everybody knows that now. People aren't primitive, they have experience of gas price fall.
Now all active Russians try to gain more money and to create economic base for future that may be less favorable. A great attention to infantil education in active families is one of the main signs of this period. Children should get ready to live in hi-tech society. Responsable parents who are short of money by different reasons spend nearly everything for babies' education.

School system is divided now into streams and more active and busy children are separated. There is a real democracy between them. Although their parents are from families with different income, no snobbery exists in advanced streams and schools.

That is the reality for some 15-20 per cent of population. The rest is less developed. There are many lumpens and people that depend upon alcohol.

The main challenge now is to teach 15-20 per cent how to resist and establish control over society.
That is the reason why Sarmat idea as well as Victorian British phenomenon are of great utility.

There are some other problems. But they aren't typical with Russia only.
One of the main challenges is the lack of low-cost. Although it is clear that sandwich-panel cottages for USD 17 000 as well as cars for some USD 2500 are quite possible in case of a worldwide initiative to create them, nothing similar to Ford T, Citroen 2 CV or Levittown exist now in the world. Even Nicolas Negroponte's initiative to create a laptop for USD 100 didn't receive an adecuate support by ruling circles all over the world.

That in not only the challenge of Russia. I think there are many potential low-cost consumers in Poland, Romania or Bulgaria. There are many people even in rich states who don't want to pay for an expensive cottage during some 25 years.

As to democracy, much depends in Russia upon a bipartisan political system but for today the opposition lead by Kasianov or Kasparov is a real zoo, not a respectable force.

Relation with the west:
Russia was isolated from the West Europe in 90. Isolation means invulnerability. Russia doesn't depend upon the EU or the USA. The West doesn't propose any new profitable or at least interesting thing. So the relations may be limited.

Relations with Poland:
Poland is EU member. Poland isn't free in its activities. It is limited by EU subordination.
Poland can elaborate new initiatives within the Eu concerning the relations with Russia, but it is not as easy to insist in them as to use right to veto.

As to Polish vetoes, Poles use right to veto in order to stop not significant treaties between Russia and EU that doesn't damage Russian business. It is impossible to make Russia respect Poland in this way.

Russian intellectuals think that in 90 Poland and Baltic states didn't have any choice. They could integrate the West even without any western help if Russia was the object of western attention.

USA and EU chose a different way. They concentrated attention and help in Poland and Baltic states and isolated Russia.

Poland may elaborate some clever initiatives in order to improve EU relations with not Russia only but the whole world as well as to soften world tension.

Today measures are quite obsolete. Mew means are required and Poles are clever enoug to find them.
For example the initiative of international low-cost cottage and vehicle projects. That may permit people all over the world to feel civilization without income increase. Cottages may permit a wide migration tha can prevent many ethnic conflicts without military interference.
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

It was our choice and our neighbours decided to stop it, because they were scared that their own societes would ask for the same we gave our ... so they invaded Poland ...

I'll separate two events: Reforms in RP and Rp partitions. Although Russia, Germany and Austria insisted in preventive antirevolutionary nature of the partitions, nobody can be sure no other reasons couldn't be invented if reforms weren't carried out.
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

We shoudnt compare it to French revolution or to 1917 in Russia. Where society decided to change everything ...

In Russia the revolution of February was limited by detronement only. The rest wasn't revolution.
In RP all ideas concerning strong state that could resist three black eagles meant only militarist state and mass repressions.
If RP events were only an evolution, why 2 bishops were murdered?
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Do you really think all the blood rivers run in France because nobels were against reforms (many voted in favor) or that was the transition from absolutism?

The only measures to defend Polish-Lithuanian independence by revolution could carry to mass repressions and militarist rule
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

this constitution was accepted in most of all local parlaments so not only some "strange liberals" supported it ... crushing majority wanted it.

I told you only that Quorum didn't exist in Central Sejm. Imagine that all Powiats adopt smth. now. Will it become a law without Parlament adoption?

As to majority. That means nothing if we discuss Truth, not popularity.
The majority of Frencmen were also revolutionary or semirevolutionary in 1789 as well as many Russians in February 1917. At least they weren't sufficiently loyal. That doesn't mean that revolutionary steps were positive.

Empty churches in EU it is just a choice of its citizens.

Make publicity of drugs openly and sell them without restrictions. Convince everybody by TV some 24 hours daily that drug dreams is the best in the life.

Some 90 per cent of the youth may become drug-dependent.
Convince by TV people that everybody should be racist. You won't recognize the society in only a year.
If adulterium is quolified as normal in each film, wery few people will follow 7 testament.
That is the explication.
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Ehhh, history shows that our reforms were good but just to futurous in this part of Europe ...

The reforms in paper were good but even RP as independent state was unable to fulfil them. Constitution of 1791 proclaimed the King as Intouchable and Irresponsable but the majority didn't have the respect even towards majestas status.

The liberties were proclaimed but even clergymen didn't have right to live

I dont consider my self as good christian ;) but I think it is possible in Poland, France, UK.

As well as to be a Jew in Middle Ages, i.e. to live in Ghetto. Post-Christianity rules everythere and some reservations for Christians.
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Yes there were 10 times menos nobels in France than the number of szlachta in RP.
But as to revolutionary process, is was similar in RP and in France.
To make RP strong enough to resist three black eagles meant to spend all resource for army, and have really a terrorist regime and blood rivers because many people could oppose to such militarist regime.
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

So I see you are really inspirated by sarmats and nowadays by Ligue of Polish Families.

Sarmatism is the same for politology as Roman Legislature for Judicial science. The difference is that the importance of Roman law is recognized by the world. As to RP politics, it is falsificated.

As to League, that is quite a marginal movement and very unexperienced, romantic. Nobody should vote in favour of such movements if some better parties exist. Parties that also defend moral but in more efficient and realistic way. I don't see such movements.

In XVIII century our society decided to change our system and it was right because this direction was proprer to make our country stronger, our society more democratic and people more free ...

These are only words. Facts represent quite a different thing.
1. Constitution in 1791 was adopted in ausence of quorum. A good beginning for free society.
2. Two bishops were killed. Who was able to assure the right to life of other people if traditionally intouchable bishops became victims?
3. A democratic society can't admit secret ideologies. Secrets are possible only to defend State security, business in some cases and privacy. No secret ideology. Polish reformist leaders such as Kosciuszko were masons, i.e. recognized closed ideology.

You wrote about the plans to make RP more democratic and people more free. But there was no difference between France in 1789 and RP in 1791.

Look at the list of Catholic Saints. A great percentage are French martyrs of the late 18-th century. Is that the freedom and democracy?

Our society just wants to live in EU and all arrguments are just about what we contriubute in, or take form EU.

I don't think there are reasons for economic isolation, customs, borders or portectionism in trade.
The point is that new technologies, economic and trade integration aren't the reasons why people should abandon 10 testaments.
Why should Poland forrow post-Christian concept of today EU states. Why shouldn't oter EU countries follow Polish Christians?
Isn't that the main idea of League?
truhlei   
18 Sep 2007
Life / You know you're Polish when... ? [111]

I'm going to ask one more question to foreigners that think they have Polish ancestors:
Are you vsure your ancestors were really Poles? They were Roman Catholics and spoke Polish? Not sufficient to come to the conclusion they were Poles.

It should be known that RP before partitions was divided into two parts: Poland (Crown) and Lithuania (Litwa). Lithania untill 19-th century is smth. different than today Lithuania. It included also today Belarus. Its residents were not only today Lithuanians but also slavs from ancient Kiev Rus.

There were Roman Catholics among Litwa residents and Polish was the official language since 1696 but that doesn't mean people in Litwa called themselves Poles even being Roman Catholics and speaking sometimes Polish.

Only in 40-s of 19-th century the idea that each Roman Catholic Polish speaking person is Pole appeared. That idea wasn't so common with Lithuania-Belarus residents before. It shouldn't be common among people with ancestors from Belarus or Lithuania now because Luthuania and Belarus states are in the political map again.

Foreigners with origin in RP. Learn better from what place your ancestors are. If from Litwa, you should come to the conclusion the y weren't Poles. They are called Litwins
truhlei   
17 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Puzzler,
You describe situation as if Poland is among wild animals. Well, I could think in the same manner if I were Pole.
The point is that a good Sarmat approach is not to accuse wild animals, not to write the history of damages (if your neighbors are wild animals they won't understand you). The only way is to look for adequate measures. That was the approach common with all szlachta. To cry and condemn is quite a chlop behavior.

Besides that you condemn Lukasz for his ignorance of Polish History. But where can he get a truth? In the books of popular Polish historians. Some of these booka are edited in Russian. A pure Polonophoby. Only romantics since 1791 are heroes. Anarchy in the past.

Puzzler first clean Polish history. The Sarmat period.

There might be truth to this, Russia is land of vast spaces, if one didnt like the government and its rule there was always space ito migrate. Thats why aboriginal people of Siberia could maintain their way of life, until communist rule I think ?

Not only space. New activities also. Since 16 century Russians had many possibilities to change profession or business. Each generation new ways opened. No reasons for intensification.

In Finland peasants had to intensify their own land and fishermen their fishing abilities. Some left for USA. The rest had to resist violence in their own land.

re: I read his books and I am finding them rather russophobic, it's enough!

- Really? Any specific examples of this alleged 'russophobia'?

Konstantinek seems to read other Norman Davies books.
Puzzles, I shall repeat: Davies main book should be in Internet. Poles should fight for the internet representation of their history.

Puzzler especially for you.
Two books were edited in Russian during last 3 years.
1. The History of Polish People by Wladyslaw Grabenski in Minsk in 2006. That is a nice book written at the beginning of 20-th century. But it is common view.

2. Historia Polski by Michal Tymowski, Jan Kieniewicz, Jerzy Holzer in Moscow in 2004. This book repeats many stereotypes on RP history and strengthens the opinion that Rp was a looser. The book was edited using financial support of The Institute of Book (Programme of translations) from Poland. As it is written in Russian (при финансовой поддкржке Института Книги - Программы переводов). The have the copyright.

Any questions on Polonophoby within neighbouring states?
truhlei   
17 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Lukasz wrote:
Think that we suolud be quite pride that when other countries in our part of Europe were definitly leaded by absolute rulers, we evaluated form more or less anarchistic country to one of the most liberal systems in all over the world ... The problem was we were to weak to defend it (we were attacked by Russians, Prussians and Austrians)

The best political system was in Poland-Lithuania in 16-17 centuries.
In 18 century Bar confederacy, Enlightenment and later Romanticism destroyed everything.

As far as I know the Constitution was adopted without quorum. A good beginning for a new democracy. When people started to protest Constitution partisans killed two BUSHOPS. A real clone of French revolution

We have never had a revolution (violent overthrow of government).

The Russians had it.

That's the truth. But that refers to 16-17 centuries. In the late RP Bar confederacy arrtempted dethronement. 1791 also was the beginning of dethronement. No differences with France in 1789.

No locality toward even majestic status

XVIII century cirsise of ou system, than one of the most liberal reforms in all over the world, unfortunately stopped by our neighbors

The most liberal RP was earlier. Royal power was limited bur King was untouchable and irresponsible. Rokosz was possible only against royal decision not against himself. There were no dethronements.

Bar confederacy and Enlightenment were two violations of RP system, not the progress.

There are powerful forces, both inside and outside, working against us. Many Poles seem not to notice - or not to be willing to notice - this.

The main threat for today is moral one. The concept of post-Christianity.

Quoting: ConstantineK
Objection!!! Alexader I gave Poland nice constitution, which was abolished only after uprising and revolution attempt during the rein of Nicolas I! Moreover Kingdom of Poland never been included in the Ru Emp but just was united with Emp by personal Union, even such "despotic" tsar as Nicolas I was crowned apart from Russia, in Poland as constitutional soverein! All have been changed only after your grandfather's uprising, so you cant refer on the fact that you had't right to change your life. You had absolutely liberal constitution!

I object too. The Poland you are writing about was only small part of cultural or even ethical Poland.

To tell you the truth that was the cultural and ethnic Poland except German and Austrian parts.
Other territories in Russian Empire away from Polish kingdom were from Litva. Poles don't recognize them as Polish now. Poland has border treaties with today Belarus Ukraine and Lithuania.

So the rebel of 1830 was absolutely vane. Its participants murdered not only Russians but also their Polish commanders (more realistic).

Oh yes, I m not so sure if you even solved problem of illiteracy in eastern part of your country.

Lukasz what do you know about Russia? Eastern part of our state is quite developed. It is Japanese partner.

ok maybe I will show it form the different point, there was focus made on Kamczatka during Abramowicz as a governor there

Abramowicz governs Czjukotka not Kamcztka. Very few people live there. No problems in financing of this region

You know your way of thinking is just so hard to understand, but it shows your imperial way of thinking, You conquer countries, and try to place under the command of your government, You use several ways to make your aim real, by force or by encouragement.
It doesn't play any difference to you.
You know, but we just don't want anything to do with you on political level ... And you will never break us ... even by economic sanctions , threads or even force.
You should just accept it.

We accept it. The West will cope with you.
The time when Russians thought about superpower is behind. Money is better.

Ask Ukrainians what do they prefer, EU or union with Russia :))))))

Russians also prefer Ukraine integration into EU. That will make EU more devil.
The point is that Russia is unable to understand why Ukraine has to pay for gas less than Germany, as it was stated by USA and EU in the late 2005

Ah, so that's what the KGB media talk into the Russkies - that those Polish nobodies dare to aspire to be the bridge between the Holy Matushka and Europe?

The mass media in Russia say nearly nothing about Poland. Poland is ignored today. Russians think there are more strong and influent states within the EU.

re: As I wrote he [Norman Davies - P.] has wife of polish origine!!!

- And what would this signify? Do you suggest that Davies lies in his books because his wife is Polish? Prove it.

Pizzler first convince Davies copyright owner to permit the scan of his book and its appearance in Internet. Everybody should have an access to such books. That shouldn't be limited by commercial interest
truhlei   
17 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

As to challenges in democratic development Russia is in 1850 now

I make hints about that nobody in Russia wants to waste our human and other resources to rebuild our zone in europe.
Czeczenia
Politkowska

Politkowska was USA citizen. She received American citizenship in 90. Russians don't trust people of the sort. They have an opportunity to emigrate while we will cope with the consequences of their human rights defense activities.

But nobody was interested in her murder. Only possible Chechen rivals. She defended human rights of Chechens but it occurred that all her protagonists were from some tribes and other tribal leaders were indignated.

Poles will soon learn more about Chechen challenges when the number of Chechen refugees grows. Receive them all please and show us wild Russians how they should be treated.

- If so, why do Russkies go hysterical when the Yanks consider installing their missiles in Poland and Czechia, or when the Baltics want to tear down Russki war memorials (those memorials should be torn down for their horrific ugliness and kitschiness alone)?

Nobody seems to understand in the whole world what does anti-missile mean and why it should be installed now when Iran is so away from building efficient missiles.

As to memorial in Tallin, its replacement was also condemned by Jewish Simon Wisiental organization.

And wasn't it you, clown, who babbled in one of your posts about Rossiya's having a growing appetite for grabbing Poland back?

Take it easy. There is no Imperialist or Communist idea in Russia today. Only money. That is the reason why Poland doesn't attract Russia today.

As for 'always' fighting with somebody or something, the history of your country shows all too plainly who is the constant aggressor and bully, not just towards your immediate neighbors, but in such remote places as Cuba and Angola.

What are Poles doing in Iraq today? So long away from their home

As for a 'complex,' isn't it you, Russkies, who have a deep-rooted inferiority complex towards 'the West'?

Such complex exists but only toward the west bank of Oder. This is the similarity between Russians and Poles

Another Russki liar, puffed-up with chutzpah and at the same time with the ever-present muzhiky inferiority complex.

Puzzler do you really think your behavior is quite szlachetny if you call muzyk an intellectual only because he has an opposite opinion. That is not the behavior of a szlachcic

What would you say about the genocide you, bandits, are committing in Chechnya right now, while the German-ruled EU winks at it?

I would say that some 20000 ethnic Russians dissappeared in Chechnya between 1991-1994

re: Poles were always anarchistic

- Interesting indeed, Lukasz. I think that the Polonophobic German and Russian propagandists of the past would be happy about such a statement coming from a Pole.

But your word choice seems to be due to your weak grasp of English, so perhaps you should be forgiven.

No, in reality we Poles have never been anarchistic, nor rebellious towards our own state. (Our rejecton of absolutism of the monarch is something different from 'anarchism').

Such ideas exist in my head as only suspected. I suspect that RP civilization is exemplar.
The point is that Polish historians falsificate Sarmat history. Away from Poland only their opinion on Sarmat state-looser is known.
A good idea to condemn Polonophobic ideas in Russia or Germany while Polish books on Polish history are full of idiotism

Anarchism and terrorism are actually Russki inventions (re: Bakunin, Kropotkin, the tsar assassins, the Bolsheviks).

You forgot Red fraction of Kalinowski in 1863
truhlei   
17 Sep 2007
History / Poland-Russia: never-ending story? [1341]

Poles were always anarchistic, and we know what the freedom is ... Russians were autoritarive and their citizens dont even know how it is to be realy free (even in their own country)

Russians know how to be really free. But they have always an extensive way: to leave for the North away from bureaucracy or to the South. Each epoch gave new opportunities for freedom and busibess: the fight for fertil lands in the South in 18 century industrialization in 19 century. Mass migration from opressed by kolhoses villages to cities in 20 centiry. As a result the Irish phenomenon. As in Ireland all active people left for USA and there were few people within the country able to resist British dominium. In Russia people didn't usually resist the strong violence. It was more profitable to leave for place less controlled by authorities