The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Home / USA, Canada  % width posts: 48

PolishAmericanReview's review of current events in America


MediaWatch 10 | 945
19 Jul 2013 #1
Here is an interesting review of current events in America by a Polish American website named PolishAmericanReview.com

polishamericanreview.com/par_014.htm

I find it quite interesting.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
19 Jul 2013 #2
I find it quite interesting.

So you find comments like this 'quite interesting'?

White Liberal Supremacists

-And God knows NBC-TV for decades has been using false imagery and slurs to slander us Polish Americans especially in the 1970's & 80's (The Polish American Guardian Society ALMOST won its lawsuit against NBC for NBC's anti-Polish defamation).

(comment : the fact that they lost in court suggests that NBC actually didn't do such a thing)

Jerzy Janowicz Awsome Winning moment - Wimbledon Quarter finals

in Sept. 1939. Poland fought BOTH huge nations...who together outnumbered Poland's population 7 to 1.... for 5 weeks before surrendering.

Can't even get their facts right - as I recall, Poland never surrendered.

..

It has to be said - this website does a far better job of insulting Polish-Americans than anyone on PF ever did.
jon357 67 | 16,836
19 Jul 2013 #3
So you find comments like this 'quite interesting'?

Doubtless since the writing style, including the inappropriate use of capitalisation, is identical to his.
OP MediaWatch 10 | 945
20 Jul 2013 #4
(comment : the fact that they lost in court suggests that NBC actually didn't do such a thing)

A court found OJ Simpson innocent so I guess he's innocent. LOL

Can't even get their facts right - as I recall, Poland never surrendered.

So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets? I didn't know that.

.
..

It has to be said - this website does a far better job of insulting Polish-Americans than anyone on PF ever did.

I highly doubt that. You have done a pretty good job just by yourself insulting Poles on the PF forum.

This website defends Polish people and also has many positive stories and youtube videos on Poles, which appears to insult your sensibilities.

In my opinion, you should be one of the last people judging what's good for Poles, since you feel anti-Polish hate joke websites are fine.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
20 Jul 2013 #5
A court found OJ Simpson innocent so I guess he's innocent. LOL

Found innocent by his peers. Who are you to argue?

So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets? I didn't know that.

What part of Poland never surrendered do you need explained?

Anyone with an even basic grasp of 20th Century Polish history knows that.

This website defends Polish people and also has many positive stories and youtube videos on Poles, which appears to insult your sensibilities.

The website doesn't do anything to defend Polish people, in fact, it does a great job of portraying Polish people as being backwards village racists. Any website that goes on about "Liberals" and promoting "White Supremacy" is, by nature, trash.

In my opinion, you should be one of the last people judging what's good for Poles, since you feel anti-Polish hate joke websites are fine.

Do I?
OP MediaWatch 10 | 945
25 Jul 2013 #6
MediaWatch: So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets? I didn't know that.

What part of Poland never surrendered do you need explained?

Well I agree the Poles in their hearts never surrendered.....but different parts of Poland stopped fighting at different times against Nazi and Soviet forces.

If you feel Poles never surrendered or stopped fighting then maybe you should tell that to all the history web sites like this one.
history.com/this-day-in-history/poland-surrenders

I know Poles are fighters but I never realized the Poles never stopped fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets and are still fighting today. That's a new one on me

;-)[/quote]
MediaWatch: This website defends Polish people and also has many positive stories and youtube videos on Poles, which appears to insult your sensibilities.

The website doesn't do anything to defend Polish people, in fact, it does a great job of portraying Polish people as being backwards village racists. Any website that goes on about "Liberals" and promoting "White Supremacy" is, by nature, trash.

So its a thought crime to talk about Liberals? Where are they promoting "White Supremacy"?

MediaWatch: In my opinion, you should be one of the last people judging what's good for Poles, since you feel anti-Polish hate joke websites are fine.

MediaWatch
Do I?

Yes you do. That's why you posted them before and took pleasure in them. Do you have to be so coy?
jon357 67 | 16,836
25 Jul 2013 #7
That site looks stupid and I feel like I'm hurting my eyes from browsing it.

Yes, very much so.

Any website that goes on about "Liberals" and promoting "White Supremacy" is, by nature, trash.

Just nutty stuff from America. Mediawatch's own tinfoil helmet site.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #8
Well I agree the Poles in their hearts never surrendered.....but different parts of Poland stopped fighting at different times against Nazi and Soviet forces.

There was never a formal surrender by the Polish. It's basic, basic Polish history - Poland kept fighting until the very end and even beyond. Nice to see that you think that Poland was cowardly and just surrendered within weeks.

If you feel Poles never surrendered or stopped fighting then maybe you should tell that to all the history web sites like this one.

Oh dear. Is that what you learn in school?

The website itself makes it clear that while Warsaw might have surrendered, the Polish did not. Do you need to learn about what the Armia Krajowa was?

So its a thought crime to talk about Liberals? Where are they promoting "White Supremacy"?

It's your website, you know where they are just fine.

Yes you do. That's why you posted them before and took pleasure in them. Do you have to be so coy?

Proof?

Just nutty stuff from America. Mediawatch's own tinfoil helmet site.

It's so nutty that MediaWatch can't even get basic Polish facts right.

Nothing new of course, he takes great pride in humiliating Poles.
OP MediaWatch 10 | 945
25 Jul 2013 #9
MediaWatch: Well I agree the Poles in their hearts never surrendered.....but different parts of Poland stopped fighting at different times against Nazi and Soviet forces.

There was never a formal surrender by the Polish. It's basic, basic Polish history - Poland kept fighting until the very end and even beyond. .

Like where? The website says first off "Poland Surrenders".

history.com/this-day-in-history/poland-surrenders

Did you not read that?

So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII? I didn't know that. When do you think they will stop fighting? LOL

When was "the very end"? That's when you said Poles fought until. Then you said they fought until "even beyond". Which is it? The very end or beyond? And what were those points in time??

Stop if with your fake sympathy for Poland. You know you hate Poland. All you have ever done is attack and find fault with Poland and Polish people for all the years you have been on the Polishforums website.

MediaWatch: So its a thought crime to talk about Liberals? Where are they promoting "White Supremacy"?

It's your website, you know where they are just fine..

Its my website? Like I designed and wrote all that stuff on that PolishAmericanReview.com website? Oh why thank you very much for that complement for thinking I can do all that! LOL But no that wasn't me. But I do like that website. If a Poland-Basher like you and the other Poland-Bashers don't like it, then it must be a fine website LOL

There is NO White Supremacy on that website. You won't give examples of it because you are lying as usual. You would only like that website if it attacked and slandered Polish people. Just admit it.

Nothing new of course, he takes great pride in humiliating Poles.

Yeah right. You're the one (and john357) with all the tinfoil anti-Polish conspriacy theories and the one who loves to humiliate Polish people. All you have ever done is bash Polish people in the years you have been here. If Jews criticize Poles here....you take the side of the Jews. If there is an issue between Poland and your favorite nation Russia....you take the side of the Russians. All you ever do here is try your hardest to find fault with Poles while professing your fake sympathy for Poland.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #10
Like where? The website says first off "Poland Surrenders"... Did you not read that?

Oh dear. MediaWatch, please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Let's start :

On this day in 1939, 140,000 Polish troops are taken prisoner by the German invaders as Warsaw surrenders to the superior mechanized forces of Hitler's army.

Straight from your link. Poland didn't surrender, only Warsaw - and if you knew anything about WW2 Poland, you'd know that the plan was always to retreat to a strategic area. The surrender of Warsaw didn't mean the surrender of Poland, and if it did, what was the "cursed soldiers" all about?

So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII? I didn't know that. When do you think they will stop fighting? LOL

As far as Poland is concerned, the war only really finished when the last President of the Government-in-Exile, Ryszard Kaczorowski handed over the symbols of his office to Lech Walesa. Successive actions since have reaffirmed that position that Poland was still not at peace until 1992 - as mentioned below.

When was "the very end"? That's when you said Poles fought until. Then you said they fought until "even beyond".

I suggest reading about the "cursed soldiers" and the Government in Exile. Again, basic history for anyone interested in Poland.

Anyway, the end point was 16th January 1992. That was when the "Treaty of Good Neighbourship and Friendly Cooperation" was ratified.

pl.wikisource.org/wiki/Traktat_mi%C4%99dzy_Rzecz%C4%85pospolit%C4%85_Polsk%C4%85_a_Republik%C4%85_Federaln%C4%85_Niemiec_o_dobrym_s%C4%85siedztwie_i_przyjaznej_wsp%C3%B3%C5%82pracy_z_17.06.1991_r

Stop if with your fake sympathy for Poland. You know you hate Poland.

Strangely, I think it's you that has the problem with Poland. You seem determined to portray Poles as being backwards village dwellers - while even insisting that they surrendered very quickly and ignoring the existence of the resistance movements.

Its my website? Like I designed and wrote all that stuff on that PolishAmericanReview.com website?

We know you wrote it, because it features exactly the same writing patterns as you have. The random capitalisation is but one giveaway.

There is NO White Supremacy on that website. You won't give examples of it because you are lying as usual.

Edited it, have you?

I wonder when you're going to apologise to Poland for insisting that she surrendered.
Harry
25 Jul 2013 #11
Like where? The website says first off "Poland Surrenders".

The title on that page is wrong.

When was "the very end"? That's when you said Poles fought until.

The conflict between Poland and Germany ran from 1 September 1939 (when Germany invaded Poland) until 8 May 1945: on that day the German Instrument of Surrender was signed and officially ended the conflict.

The conflict between Poland and the USSR ran from 17 September 1939 (when the USSR invaded Poland) until 30 July 1941: on that day the Sikorski–Mayski agreement was signed and officially ended the conflict.

It is shameful that people who claim to be in the slightest bit Polish know so little about Polish history.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #12
on that day the Sikorski-Mayski agreement was signed and officially ended the conflict.

I don't think in Polish eyes that either of those treaties count - but either way, it shows how utterly ignorant MediaWatch is if he thinks that the Poles surrendered after 5 weeks.

Strange how the same nonsense is found on his website, isn't it?
Harry
25 Jul 2013 #13
I don't think in Polish eyes that either of those treaties count

The one from 30 July 1941 certainly counts: it was signed by the Polish prime minister!

it shows how utterly ignorant MediaWatch is if he thinks that the Poles surrendered after 5 weeks.

Now there is a shocker: North American who claims to be Polish is utterly ignorant of basic facts about Poland! Never seen that before, have we.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #14
The one from 30 July 1941 certainly counts: it was signed by the Polish prime minister!

That's a question - was it ratified under the rules of the Government-in-Exile?

As far as I understand it, Poland seems to regard the Government-in-Exile's decisions as not being binding?

Now there is a shocker: North American who claims to be Polish is utterly ignorant of basic facts about Poland! Never seen that before, have we.

Definitely shocker!
TheOther 5 | 3,711
25 Jul 2013 #15
if he thinks that the Poles surrendered after 5 weeks.

Why does it matter anyhow? The Polish forces got crushed by the invading German and Soviet forces, and after a few weeks everything was over. Resistance movements existed in almost all occupied countries, even though their armies surrendered to the Germans.
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #16
Well, speaking purely from the common Polish point of view - one source of pride among most of them is that Poland never formally surrendered. It's what lent legitimacy to the Armia Krajowa and subsequent resistance movements. I think in the minds of the Polish, while the territory was lost, sovereignty wasn't - hence why the Government-in-Exile continued in London just as the Free French did.

MediaWatch is being amazingly ignorant of Polish history if he believes that Poland surrendered.
Harry
25 Jul 2013 #17
That's a question - was it ratified under the rules of the Government-in-Exile?

It was indeed ratified under the rules of the G-i-E.

As far as I understand the actions of the G-i-E are recognised as legitimate by Poland if taken before the TRJN was set up.
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
25 Jul 2013 #18
suggests that NBC actually didn't do such a thing

I'm sure you weren't following those events blow by blow back then. Alll it proved was that the big bucks were on the TV network's side to bankroll pricey big-time lawyers as well as various forms of behind-the-scenes pressure.

Only the very naive believe rich and poor receive equal treatment in courts anywhere. Unless one happanes to belong to a PC-supported showcase minority. Can a court-appointed lawyer compete with a heavily bankrolled pricey top-shelf attorney?
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #19
Alll it proved was that the big bucks were on the TV network's side to bankroll pricey big-time lawyers as well as various forms of behind-the-scenes pressure.

Expensive lawyers do tend to get results - that's why they're expensive.

showcase minority

Could you name some?
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
25 Jul 2013 #20
Any website that promotes lefty-liberals and their PC fairy tales is by definition pure rubbish!
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
25 Jul 2013 #21
Could you perhaps explain which websites promote which "showcase minorities"?
jon357 67 | 16,836
25 Jul 2013 #22
PC fairy tales

Do expand on this.

Surely someone who believes in pregnant virgins would like fairy tales.
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
26 Jul 2013 #23
Could you name some?

Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists, the operators of abortion mills, animals....
sobieski 107 | 2,128
27 Jul 2013 #24
animals....

I have just informed our cat that he is part of a showcase minority with its own dedicated websites and expensive lawyers to defend its rights. He was very impressed.
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
27 Jul 2013 #25
own dedicated websites and expensive lawyers

You learn something new every day. Yes, there are loads of organisations with an animal rights agendas, not to mention the ecologists defending the habitat of frogs and rodents. They've got their own websites, are often bankrolled by wealthy donors, defended by pricey lawyers and promoted by professional PR specialists. And there's nothing wrong with that, except denying it exists. Here are but two websites; the rest you'll have to find on your own.

greatnonprofits.org/categories/view/animals?gclid=CIPzrdz-zrgCFQYd3godEHgANg

abolitionistapproach.com
delphiandomine 88 | 18,475
27 Jul 2013 #26
They've got their own websites, are often bankrolled by wealthy donors, defended by pricey lawyers and promoted by professional PR specialists.

That sounds strangely like the Lux Veritas foundation - bankrolled by dubious anonymous donors, backed up by expensive lawyers and promoted by expensive specialists.
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
27 Jul 2013 #27
That sounds strangely like the Lux Veritas foundation

Hijacking a thread again? The Lux Foundation is deifntiely not one of the PC dictatorship's pet minorities, glamourised, promoted and handled with kid gloves. Why not then start a thread on the PC dictatoirship's bêtes noires, bugbears, hate-speech targets and other assorted pet villains. That would be a first on PF and would come from a partisan source that knows what he's talking about.
jon357 67 | 16,836
27 Jul 2013 #28
Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists, the operators of abortion mills, animals....

That doesn't really make sense.

Do you have something against the people listed above? And why animals?
sobieski 107 | 2,128
27 Jul 2013 #29
Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists, the operators of abortion mills, animals....

You forgot to mention second-hand women, and people who like popmusic.
Polonius3 1,000 | 12,446
27 Jul 2013 #30
sobieski
Those were but a few examples. Others include domestic violence but only by males against women. The PC folks have to tread lightly round this topic since the most domestic violence occurs in same-sex households, and those are the darlings of the PC dictatorship. Intetrested in exploring that topic? Go to it and do your Google homework or forever hold your peace.


Home / USA, Canada / PolishAmericanReview's review of current events in America
BoldItalic [quote]
 
To post as Guest, enter a temporary username or login and post as a member.