Kids in school dont read books and learn to pass exam, they study to get knowledge. On exam there might be some questions with intentions to check this knowledge. Question are unclear? come on, i know this questions, my sister took this exam this year too, majority of question was to check the skill of understanding of reading text, if your kid had problem with it, i feel sorry for You since you will have big problems with him in MIDDLE school. *this year this exam was awfully easy and every one got high scores which is not so good for good students so i cant understand from where you get this "he marks achieved were very low" maybe just lame school?
Less maths than usual and more chemistry than usual. The mean mark on a national level was appallingly low.
indeed there was more chemistry but it was on kid level indeed but come on, it all was based on pictures and graphs etc, a person that was "an idiot from chemistry" with a little of luck could get 30 points like my sister described it
Straightforward, but the results count for nothing - disregarded in terms of high school entry. SO WHAT'S THE POINT??
its still in tests to get ideal level of difficulty so its not official, but my sister said that in better schools they look on it too ;)
Then, you get points towards high school entry based on your marks for your last semester.
Its perfecly great system i think you might want to say you have somethin against certain teachers not the system itself, i as a person that came thro this system must say that i didnt get higher or lower grades, i got what i deserved
Are there still max 200 points for everything???
50 first exam
80 from grades
20 from special achivments
its clear its fair its centralised its universal like also its the recrutation itself is internet'lised