It's still totalitarian imagery, and whereas I found both amusing, there are many people who have suffered under totalitarianism both left and right who didn't appreciate it.
I completely understand that.
However, as I wrote before, I don't think comparing a politician because of his populism to Hitler on a cover of a magazine is the same as using Hitler to advertise/promote something in a TV advertisement.
It's simply not the same.
So, you're wrong in claiming that Hitler was already used in a commercial like the Heya ad.
It's in the post. Begins with 'W'. Large city in Poland.
I've asked where you live before you edited your post, smartass :)))
About the nature of being offended by ads. Did the Lenin one (which surprised me when I saw it) offend you? It didn't offend me (nor did the Wprost ad) but I guessed when I saw both that some wouldn't like it.
I saw it once and it didn't offend me. But I thought it was a bit "too much" and that even the younger generation who treats some elements of PRL "culture" as a fun popcultural thing won't be able to relate to this ad ;)
Btw, you still haven't answered why would you consider Heya ad with Hitler "much much worse" than Heya ad with Lenin.
So? Why?