A popular myth amongst climate "skeptics" is that historically atmospheric CO2 levels have risen after temperature increases began, and therefore it's actually temperature increases that cause CO2 increases, and not vice-versa as basic climate science and physics would have us believe.
Wrong. When did you stop beating your wife?
One cannot call a "myth" something that is based on hard scientific data. There is evidence that CO2 levels are rising hundreds of years after the rise of global temperatures.
CO2 has no implication in temperature rise. There is no scientific evidence it has any bearing on temperature changes unless you believe that something that follows in the wake of a temperature change can alter the past. There is no science to show this.
I challenge you to quit making stuff up and point me to your sources that indicate CO2 precedes temperature changes in paleoclimatology. I've only had 15 years of exposure to the subject so it is possible I missed something.
Now give me any hard evidence that CO2 indeed is causing global warmning (no, computer simulations and predicions are not evidence, especialy when comming from people known to falsify data.)
I would far prefer the billions of euros being spent on useless schemes (e.g. wind and solar in Europe) to be spent on saving lives NOW.
Yeah, it's not like Globalwarmthinking is affecting worldwide policies, promoting new taxes and other sh!t