Muddy thinking there, I-S.
Nothing of the sort jon. If what I write goes over your head you cannot blame it on me.
A clear example of 'whatiffery' there
Still with the info available at the time of my post (, and I'm not really interested in the case, so I'm hardly up to date) the only thing one could say for certain that there is lost of IF and WHATS.
This story as sold by the media simply doesn't make sense. If something doesn't make sense it is most likely a lie.
How on Earth that dude convinced the woman to go to some foreign country ? Either he is a professor Moriarty a genius of crime or ( how to explain the he was caught like some inept moron ?) the alleged victim is retarded or there is a lot we - the public - don't know about.
In short because I don't want to waste more time on something that cannot be solved on PF. Something that is a real side issue for me. A distraction.My point being that Harry would never stared thread like this IF a perpetrator of the crime was a member of a minority group.
I know it, you know it and Harry also knows it. Why not fess up then? That you have double standards and taboos. Simple.
Why all this denial? It just redundant and is pointless at this point.
He has admitted guilt.
Hmm... so what? I miss the point here? Have you never heard about the cases when people accused of a crime falsely admitted their guilt?