Not really, its the same difference, to those who have friends and family who have been solicitors very long time tend to refer to it as it was.
true, but it is misleading, a lot has changed since the end of 'articles'. further, for one to be using that term when informing another whilst still in practice is, as i said, misleading and shows their lack of detail to developments within their profession. on the other hand, they just work for a rubbish practice and have no law graduates wanting to complete their TC with themselves. :/
either way it is now incorrect.
Thats nothing to be proud of!
ok it wasn't a 'first class- 1:1' but coming from one of the top universities in england i am proud of myself and with it (2:1) i am sure i am to find employment within a top firm or chambers if one where seeking employment.
(TC? Terms and Conditions? - using acronyms doesn’t make you look smart!)
???? why would i ever think it displays some form of my intelligence? that comment, although amusing, just suggest something to me about yours to even think that..
The above I can agree with until the point where you mention the word "women" after that it goes down hill, because, you are almost admitting she is with your purely for your wealth and nothing more. But I must ask you a question, do you have speech impediment..only the over use of "a" seems to point towards this.
haha i don't know what to make of this, i am not a stickler for spelling and grammar but i could sit here all day correcting your errors, within that same sentence there are about 3 grammatical errors, which is ironic! secondly, only an idiot would point out the fact that there are more 'a's than are actually needed and assume it had something to do with my speech and not make a more sensible assumption and infer it had something to do with my keyboard - i actually thought you had a brain from your first response, i beg to differ. lastly, if you are going to indicate a specific word and put it within commas, then please use the exact word you are quoting. i say this because from the above comment i have not used the word 'WOMEN', i said 'WOMAN'.
but back to the main point of that, i was talking of women in general not the woman i am with. even so, if this were the case, then it is only natural for a person to upgrade. i woman isn't going to be with a man that treats her like crap and hasn't a penny to his name when there is another man who wants her and is hard working and has money and treats her right. thus, if she is with me for that reason and she is happy and i am happy then there isn't a problem since relationships are in the main built on two couples being happy together for what ever reason.
Question ShellyS, which i may just post out of interest. poor white man that has no charm nor respect for women or wealthy black man that has charm and respects women and is likely to make you happy in most ways