southern 74 | 7,074 24 Sep 2010 #1I would divide them into:1.Village girls2.Sponsored girlsWhat do you think?
pgtx 29 | 3,145 24 Sep 2010 #2What do you think?only 2 categories?cmon southern... you can do better...
OP southern 74 | 7,074 24 Sep 2010 #4cmon southern... you can do better...I chose to be deductive in this thread.Maybe there is also an intellectual category as well but all categories are horny.
OP southern 74 | 7,074 24 Sep 2010 #6I mean whether intellectual,village or sponsored they display the same exciting attitude.So you never fail.While if you are a food lover you may fail because not all of them have cooking abilities.
Natasa 1 | 578 25 Sep 2010 #7I think from scientific point of view that you followed the rules for classifications:1. categories are mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive2.the principle used should be essential (doubtful)I would suggest that you use for you more essential criteria and that would be level of sexual excitement , so :1. horny2. little bit less hornyit looks now better.
Seanus 15 | 19,672 25 Sep 2010 #8Fantasy criteria are the exclusive preserve of southern. Others know that many Polish women just to like to go out and have a good time but tend not to be horny.
OP southern 74 | 7,074 25 Sep 2010 #9but tend not to be hornyMaybe they are not horny with you.But from what I have experienced they crave at least for caressing and kissing.I guess that polish mothers caress their children a lot.
Natasa 1 | 578 25 Sep 2010 #10Others know that many Polish women just to like to go out and have a good time but tend not to be horny.I was proposing this as universal classification for Southern that he can apply to all women, not just Polish.I think I did a good job ;)
Seanus 15 | 19,672 25 Sep 2010 #11Don't mistake offering money payments to them for them being horny, southern ;)Try caressing and kissing girls here in a bar and you will see the reaction, southern. I doubt Polish mothers overly focus on it tbh
OP southern 74 | 7,074 25 Sep 2010 #121. categories are mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive2.the principle used should be essential (doubtful)It would be boring this way.For example village girls vs city girls.I had opened this thread before.Let's say even city girls have an element of polish village inside them.Poland cannot be understood without the village.The same applies to Ukrainki.There are also religious vs not religious virgins vs happy but we have made these distinctions they are not specific.An interesting thread would be Serbian girls vs polish girls(except way of dancing).
Natasa 1 | 578 25 Sep 2010 #13Serbian girlsSerbian girls tend to babble a lot about morality and they mostly pretend that they don't like sex, so my criteria is useless.Ask Crow.It would be boring.But I still don't understand what kind of division you have in mind with this serbian vs polish.
OP southern 74 | 7,074 25 Sep 2010 #14Serbian girls tend to babble a lot about morality and they mostly pretend that they don't like sex, so my criteria is useless.This does not prevent them from wearing the shortest miniskirts and skimpy outfits.I think Serbian are more serious than polish.Polish always welcome.
king polkakamon - | 542 25 Sep 2010 #15Try caressing and kissing girls here in a bar and you will see the reaction, southern.You think they will call the lady cleaners?
Natasa 1 | 578 25 Sep 2010 #16This does not prevent them from wearing the shortest miniskirts and skimpy outfits.Yes. In Serbian meat market male demand is setting those idiotic rules.
king polkakamon - | 542 25 Sep 2010 #18. In Serbian meat market male demand is setting those idiotic rules.In polish meat market some similar rules prevail.3. gold digger$I know they are different from sponsored.
George8600 10 | 631 27 Sep 2010 #19What do you think?Shove it. Stop labeling and stereotyping women, they are individuals too and especially the Polish girls I have met. Women aren't material products to be labeled and treated like cards.
Natasa 1 | 578 27 Sep 2010 #211. loaded2. for ignoringis one of the most common categorizations you all know very well and you can feel it as a painful doubt deep in your heart when they look at you with those innocent eyes.I'm personally not using that one.
OP southern 74 | 7,074 27 Sep 2010 #221. loaded2. for ignoringPolki look often at the romantic side of this categorization.
Natasa 1 | 578 27 Sep 2010 #23I heard once from a girl that women are most honest at the moment when they say to a rich guy I love you. She said it in a very romantic way, with sincere warmth in her eyes.So I understand the romantic aspects you're talking about.
Natasa 1 | 578 27 Sep 2010 #25they have sex once in 4 months from the beginning. she was his first, he was then in his late 20 is. that has to be payed. But she is a better in trade because she pretends that she minds that fact and she doesn't (completely asexual, but mostly half naked).She was simultaneously with 2 of them for two years, trying to anticipate who will earn more in future.She chose the right one.He is happy. It's a bizarre story. At least here.
noreenb 7 | 554 27 Sep 2010 #26Cathegory of girls? What is this?first: these ones who thinksecond : those ones who don't thinkthe third can be: these ones who like youthe fourth one: these ones with whom you will sleepthe fifth one: these ones who don't know you yetsixth: these ones who will never meet youseventh: those ones who hate youeight: these ones with whom you will never sleepThe end of my genial post.
f stop 25 | 2,503 28 Sep 2010 #29there are 3 categories of guys:1. the ones we like2. the ones we don't like3. the ones you we're not sure about yet.Which category is the guy in depends on numerous criteria , and their weight according to what is important to a woman, like intelligence, looks, age, ability to provide, sense of humour, political affiliation, experience, baggage, religion, location, fashion sense, personality, etc etc etcIn reality, we just look accross a room at some guy we know absolutely nothing about and for totally unknown reasons we decide we're going to... change him.Never understood it myself.;)
Natasa 1 | 578 28 Sep 2010 #30like intelligence, looks, age, ability to provide, sense of humour, political affiliation, experience, baggage, religion, location, fashion sense, personality, etc etc etcSome things are missing here ;)