Just because the dude didnt marry her, he doesnt have to pay for sticking his dick in without protection?
Why should he pay? I mean we are not talking here about retards do we? Women know very well they can get pregnant - right? So they should be smart about it. If they let a dude to impregnate them without protective agreement (marriage) - they have themselves to blame if he bales on them.
After all a dude is not asked if a woman want to have a child, want to have an abortion or whatnot. She can make decision on her own without his consent. So if she want a child she should pay for it. Are we for equality or not. Why men should be discriminated against?
sorry for your wife)
What? Do you know anything about women? Seems to me like you have no clue.
Nice get out clause for you men.
No, an abortion is. That would have a sobering effect on women. Right now they are delusional. Logic is fine, a marriage is not about not happy ever or a luve but about children, both partners agree to start a family, I see it as a contract.
The mare fact that a man sired a child shouldn't be a cause for discriminate against him. What right he has over that child - none or very little, but he has a duty to pay. That is clearly unfair considering that is a woman's decision to have this child in the first place.