Someone has lost his temper.. A bit uncomfortable with all the facts and quotations?
Allies: 360,000 dead or wounded
So when you said that "the French for example, who surrendered to the nazists without a fight", you were, in fact, lying. Thanks for admitting that.
You are right, I should have written that they surrendered after lost a battle, so they can keep their government. How typical that you don't adress your mistake about how many people were killed, but my unfortune use of words.
It wasn't 'polish' blue police, as it was created and run by Germans in occupied Poland.
It was entirely Polish (apart from a few senior officers). It was a continuation of the interbellum Polish police and was recognised as both legitimate and lawful by the Polish government in exile. It was disbanded by the Polish provisional government. It was a Polish police force and it assisted with the Holocaust: deal with those facts.
It was created by Germans in occupied Poland, and run by Germans, as opposed to France, which kept their government and their police forces, for the price of collaboration. Which part of that you don't understand? Should we dumb it down for you even more?
I never said there weren't any Poles colaborating with the Germans, I said it was rare and on a smaller scale than in the other counries, because oft the hatered towards nazis. How dare you accuse me of being a liar, and not even respod to all historical sources I have presented (from JEWISH historians as well)
You appear to forget that the UK declared war on Germany as a result of the German invasion of Poland and that the first British action against Germany started some 90 minutes after the declaration of war. Or you didn't forget about it and simply chose to lie by claiming that Britain did not take any action: which is it?
They could have as well declared a war on Madagascar, since they only declared it and didn't do much about it. But it's nice you admit that it wasn't a lie after all. But you're changigng your mind awfully fast for someone who believes himself so well educated in history.
As for checking facts, you'll want to read just a little more widely than just sanitized wikipedia if you want to learn more about Poland's history: for some reason Wikipedia has a habit of not telling the truth about those, it's almost as if there is a group of Polish and other CEE editors who are trying to deliberately re-write history via wikipedia.
Wikipedia is as good source of information as any other, as it gives us quotqtiuons from historical sources by many different historians. Unless you are big-headed self-declared homegrown 'historian' who doesn't care about historical sources, unless they treat Polish people as antisemitic murderers. Actually from what you just said, I believe that you consider that Poles are some sort of homicidal anisemitic monsters, with no white spots in their history, and if the historical sources say otherwise they are surely wrong, and the historians who write anything good about Poland are lying, or are polish themselves.
You have some sort of serious polish - phobia mister, and I advise you to contact the psychiatrist as soon as possible.
And don't offend the people who are trying to have some serious conversation with you, by calling them liars, even thogh they quoted a lot of historical sources and you didn't, this makes you look rude, cheap and fanatic little man