Who is this Ms. Albright character? I was quite clearly referring to a Ms. Julia Brystiger
Apologies, I thought you were referring to a Jewish born Catholic woman who certain Poles like to talk about murdering Catholics.
Do you really think personal insults are the best way to finish off, Harry? … in the manner of a five-year-old child
You might have slightly better results with your ‘how dare you resort to personal insults’ routine if you didn’t then resort to personal insults yourself.
You've responded pretending not to know their content, which shows you most likely a coward, or just intellectually lazy at best, and continued with your stall with what appeared to be an attempt to change the subject.
I was not pretending to not know anything: I stated that I didn’t read you post. However, I’ll happily do so now and tear your comments to shreds.
And well into her career [post edited for reasons of boredom] it's probably not one worth making.
Yawn. My point was that it is not correct to call her a Jew. She had a Jewish father but herself was a Catholic.
Yes, those damn upity Jews! Asking for their property back!
Asking for someone else's property back, actually. Someone that no longer exists.
If you would like to claim that all claims by Jewish Poles are for property which did not belong to them, please do so. It’ll no doubt help your acceptance by the rabidly Teraz Polska crew here for you to be seen telling obviously anti-semitic lies here. Alternatively you could try not posting lies.
What are you, Giles Coren?
No. Cohen is British, Jewish, a polonophobe and a moron. I’m none of those things. And yes I did write to the Times to complain about that
Does the mention of the word 'Kielce' suddenly cause you to lose all understanding of written language, thus explaining (beyond just plain extreme thickheadedness) why you don't get it, are you a fool, a liar, or ar you just not willing to accept the by now widely-known fact that these events were staged by Soviets?
I see. So all of the participants in the Kielce pogrom were actually Russians (or at least from the USSR). OK, keep believing in your revisionist version of history. Got any comments about the Krakow pogrom or the 118 Jews murdered in the Lublin district between the summer of 1944 and the fall of 1946? All the staged by the Soviets?
You seem to have a very deep-seated desire to want to believe the Polish are to blame.
You seem to have a very deep-seated desire to want to believe that all Poles are angels and never did anything wrong (apart from the Jews, and they aren’t real Poles to you anyway).
Why should totally unrelated Jews, with nothing in common with anyone related to the event aside from a common religion, profit from it?
Rough translation: you can’t answer the question so you instead ask another question. Good debating skills there!
And what, exactly, is the tax status of world Zionist organizations in Poland, oh all-seeing and logical Harry, hmm? Your argument fails there, I think.
You name them, and I’ll find out about their tax status.
I assume that by 'thrown out', you mean 'provided hard military escort and financial aid to Jews abandoning the country in favor of emigration to Israel, despite their obvious lack of obligation to do any such thing' (a strange use of language, that)? Or are you referring to Stalin's deportations,
You are going to fit in here! You manage to interpret armed guards taking people out of the country as a “hard military escort” and the process of stealing a person’s possessions as “financial aid”. And then you manage to describe deportations which took place in 1968 as “Stalin’s”, despite the bloke having died some 15 years previously. A stroke of sheer genius!
I understand that you're an English teacher
I understand that you know nothing at all about me and have been wrong in every one of your guesses so far.
which could explain the love for forming intricate webs of B.S. to create the illusion of invincible and unquestionable truth - that's what literature nuts do for fun with their spare time, isn't it?
It could explain it, were I to be an English teacher. As for what literature nuts do in their spare time: I watched 12 episodes of 24 (season two) back to back yesterday, what are the chances of me being a literature nut? But do keep making guesses about me: it’s as good to see you being completely wrong about me as it is to see you being completely wrong about history.
So, I've countered a number your arguments, givin them quite the sound beating about the ears, and exposed how nonfunctional they really are in a single post.
Wow! I knew you liked to reinterpret history and revise the facts, but I never thought that you would try to revise such recent history in such a spectacularly pathetic fashion. You make David Irving look like a serious respectable historian (and no doubt you think that he is one too).
Is that really the best you've got?
Would you mind if I answered your question with a question (bad form I know but indulge me): is that really the best you’ve got?