PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Archives - 2010-2019 / UK, Ireland  % width 310

The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v Poland


SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #121
And by far the greatest concentration in Europe are in the British Isles.

Yeah? I wouldn't be sure about that.

What country in Europe has the most castles?

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
You'd never guess but, according to the Guinness Book of Records,

In first place : Liechtenstein

In second place : The Czech Republic

Yahoo answers

My point is that Poland has some interesting and historical buildings, but really not many, and the best ones tend to be well known. Britain is groaning under the weight of them.

I tell you something that is not brought so much to light, is the prehistory.
In Ireland the place is littered with portal dolmens, ring forts and sites like Newgrange.
In England you have Stone Henge and other megalithic structures but here it's not shown so much or maybe I just miss it, i can't deny that could be a factor but I do actively look for it...
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #122
Yeah? I wouldn't be sure about that.

I would. The ones in the Czech Republic are largely later buildings, and Lichtenstein (pop. 35,000, 60sqm) hardly counts.

In Ireland the place is littered with portal dolmens, ring forts and sites like Newgrange.
In England you have Stone Henge and other megalithic structures but here it's not shown so much.

Yes. The British Isles (and people forget northern Scotland in this respect) have a huge amount of pre-Roman remains.
In Poland there are some, but only some, and a tragic thing that happened was stone circles being destroyed in the 1930s by the order of village priests. Something similar happened in Spain.
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #123
I would. The ones in the Czech Republic are largely later buildings, and Lichtenstein (pop. 35,000, 60sqm) hardly counts.

So come on then, show us some sources :)

a tragic thing that happened was stone circles being destroyed in the 1930s by the order of village priests.

Really? I never heard of that, have you any further reading on it, please?

Something similar happened in Spain.

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
not even megalithic man :)
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #124
So come on then, show us some sources :)

Can't be arsed

Really? I never heard of that, have you any further reading on it, please?

I'll look it up - one was in Warsaw!
Barney  17 | 1672  
15 Oct 2010 /  #125
I tell you something that is not brought so much to light, is the prehistory.
In Ireland the place is littered with portal dolmens, ring forts and sites like Newgrange.
In England you have Stone Henge and other megalithic structures but here it's not shown so much or maybe I just miss it, i can't deny that could be a factor but I do actively look for it...

Most of the Megalithic structures are dotted around the European coast, I wonder if the Baltic coast has many examples?
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #126
Just a quick google was fruitful:

Dolmen sites
Megalithic tombs are found from the Baltic Sea and North Sea coasts ...

In Mecklenburg and Pomerania/Pomorze in (Germany) and (Poland), Drenthe (Netherlands), large numbers of these graves were disturbed when harbours, towns, and cities were built. The boulders were used in construction and road building. There are still many thousands left today in Europe.

And who could forget my own thread :) The Celts in Poland. where I hypothesised "Celtic Cairns" here in Poland. i call them 'Celtic' but I think they pre-date the Celts, even in Ireland.

Can't be arsed

The English damp weather has obviously effected your ability to debate ;p (it's drizzling here too).
zetigrek  
15 Oct 2010 /  #127
But you've got burning hot water out of one, and freezing cold water out of the other. When visiting, the brain struggles to comprehend why anyone would do that.

to save water.
Trevek  25 | 1699  
15 Oct 2010 /  #128
I'm not sure about the self-made part.

I think you missed the irony.

perhaps it shoul;d have read "The English consider themselves a self-made race"

I'd suggest the thing about the English is they were just better at doing it than a lot of others, who would have done it if they had had the chance. name any major power that hasn't done it?

there are some pretty important parts of British heritage in museums around the US

Like the British army flags captured by American forces during the war of independence.
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #129
to save water.

The reason was due to public health rules in some big cities, about not mixing hot and cold water. Though the rules have now changed, not everyone has switched to mixer taps, although individual taps are increasingly rare.

I'd suggest the thing about the English is they were just better at doing it than a lot of others, who would have done it if they had had the chance. name any major power that hasn't done it?

Exactly.
Trevek  25 | 1699  
15 Oct 2010 /  #130
I beg to differ, there are quite a few castles around here, the nearest ruin to me is from the end of the 14 century

Living in warmia and mazury, I can vouch for a load of Teutonic castles. Malbork is nearby and is the biggest castle in Europe (or biggest brick one, I can't remember).
dtaylor5632  18 | 1998  
15 Oct 2010 /  #131
or biggest brick one

It's the biggest brick castle in the world, Windsor is the biggest castle in the world.
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #132
It's certainly one of the largest brick ones, and by far the largest from that period - but there aren't that many others.
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #133
but there aren't that many others.

There are loads and loads, I am not just saying that in some mad bout of insanity.

They look different to the Island ones, I will give you that but I wouldn't say there are less.

i still think you've been in Warsaw too long.
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #134
There are loads and loads

Not that many compared to the British Isles, which have a huge number.
Though my point is about historic buildings in general. Not just the odd ruined castle or preserved palace, but the whole built environment, which in PL is generally far newer than in the UK.

i still think you've been in Warsaw too long.

If only! I haven't bee there for ages :-(
dtaylor5632  18 | 1998  
15 Oct 2010 /  #135
I agree with SeanBM, if you venture out of the cities and into the "deep" country you will find tonnes of castle, towers, palaces. They're there and not really that hard to find.

Not that many compared to the British Isles, which have a huge number.

Though the UK has been a warring country with itself more often during history. Wales has more castles than any other country in the world.
Amathyst  19 | 2700  
15 Oct 2010 /  #136
The English are a self-made race... which relieves god of the respnosibility.

Aren't races? God has nothing to do with it.

Another subtle thing which might be worth noting is the lack of queueing for buses etc,

Fastly becoming a thing of the past, I got barged in front of by a couple of africans and an old chinese woman tonight as the bus pulled up (Id been waiting for 20 minutes and was there before all of them!)...Politeness doesnt pay any longer and for one who has always given up a seat, I wont be standing there with my slightly naive English polite ways..Im sick of it! Its the same in supermarkets in the city centre...

I'm not sure about the self-made part.
Would you consider stealing the wealth of half the globe during the British Empire times a sign that the British are a self-made race? Or a race of thieves?

I dont think he was talking about that...Also, we're not the only ones..what about the the Aztecs?

Lol, The British museums are absolutely fantastic because of it.
They robbed so many cultures, it's amazing.

And they have been treated with care and on show for the world.....But to be honest Id give it all back if we could have the Bayeux Tapestry back that was woven by English women! But I bet you didnt know that!

Sounds like most of the North of England :D

Indeed. People sometimes forget though, how much crossed the atlantic during the C20.

We have engineered the conditions to maintain these artifacts...otherwise they would have perished!

Barbara hepworth

Was she a sculper? Her names ring a bell..

I'm sitting in the UK now, in northern England, in an area with heavy industrial development, heavily bombed during WW2 and nothing particularly special. Yet within a quarter a mile there's a ruined medieval castle, a Saxon church and a handful of five hundred year-old houses

Though the UK has been a warring country with itself more often during history. Wales has more castles than any other country in the world.

UK is the British Isles..and Wales is part of that...He meant on the Island, not just England..
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #137
And they have been treated with care and on show for the world.....But to be honest Id give it all back if we could have the Bayeux Tapestry back that was woven by English women! But I bet you didnt know that!

Sounds like most of the North of England :D

Agree 100%

We have engineered the conditions to maintain these artifacts...otherwise they would have perished!

I mean all the stuff that went from the UK to America. I'm sure they're looking after it all nicely, and we have plenty to spare, but still - people would be surprised at the extent.

Was she a sculptor? Her names ring a bell..

Yes
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #138
I agree with SeanBM

Only mad men and Jonni don't :)

Though my point is about historic buildings in general. Not just the odd ruined castle or preserved palace, but the whole built environment, which in PL is generally far newer than in the UK.

But there were people here before people started calling themselves 'Polish' as an identity for thousands of years. How is the U.K. older than that?

I really don't think that the U.K. has more, I could be wrong but I doubt it.
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #139
But there were people here before people started calling themselves 'Polish' as an identity for thousands of years. How is the U.K. older than that?

What??!?

I mean the large number of 17th and 18th century buildings that were erected in the UK and still survive, not pre-slavic/romano-british stuff!
dtaylor5632  18 | 1998  
15 Oct 2010 /  #140
UK is the British Isles..and Wales is part of that...He meant on the Island, not just England..

So did I, I was just pointing out the point that a lot of the UK and Irelands castle remain because we weren't invade that many times unless we were fighting ourselves.

Wales is part of the uk? try telling them that :P
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
15 Oct 2010 /  #141
What??!?

Though my point is about historic buildings in general. Not just the odd ruined castle or preserved palace, but the whole built environment, which in PL is generally far newer than in the UK.

I focused on the "my point is about historic buildings in general." "which in PL is generally far newer than in the UK." part.

I mean the large number of 17th and 18th century buildings that were erected in the UK and still survive

Ok, I see your point with that but using some rational thinking, wouldn't the castles here have been destroyed because of feudal wars (for which the castles were built to defend against) than in Britain?
jonni  16 | 2475  
15 Oct 2010 /  #142
wouldn't the castles here have been destroyed because of feudal wars (for which the castles were built to defend against) than in Britain?

Of course. Just as hundreds (if not thousands) in the UK were dismantled after the Restoration to prevent them being used. Most have still left substantial ruins, and the stone from the depredations usually still remains in nearby buildings.
convex  20 | 3928  
15 Oct 2010 /  #143
to save water.

hahahaha :)
Amathyst  19 | 2700  
15 Oct 2010 /  #144
I mean all the stuff that went from the UK to America.

Its funny you say that, my friends grandmother is German and they were (still are!) extremely wealthy, when they came back their rather extensive property in the Black Forrest it had been stripped bare by the Yanks! Cheeky feckers were still living in too!

Yes

We covered her in School..I just googled her now to make sure I was right...So ahead of her time..And a woman too in them times..

Only mad men and Jonni don't :)

Add Shelley to that...Just think Sean, all those items that would have been lost and gone unadmired had it not been for us theiving scum...Tombs were robbed in Egypt by locals and items sold off or worse melted down..history was lost...As much as you hate it we have preseved it and brought the past to life...Plus given so much joy to others...You might want to think on...museums dont charge in the UK so its FREE for all to see, nobody is making a profit out it..British tax payers ensure that these items are cared for.

But there were people here before people started calling themselves 'Polish' as an identity for thousands of years. How is the U.K. older than that?

There have been tribes on my Island for over 500,000 years...Angles was the first term which was coined by the Romans...which was in about 55BC.

By the way how long have the Irish been known as "Irish" !!!!!!!!!!
dtaylor5632  18 | 1998  
15 Oct 2010 /  #145
Angles was the first term which was coined by the Romans.

Are you sure about that, cos im sure it may not be the case since they were a German tribe that settled in England after the roman occupation.
Amathyst  19 | 2700  
16 Oct 2010 /  #146
Hmmm....My mistake :( Anyway, Im English...A Briton, not British (hate that term!)..I dont even mind the fact we were feck left right and centre by the Romans, Germans and French..oh and the Danes to a lesser extent (only in the North and East, this I know to be true because of archaeological digs - got a friend who was an archiologist :D )..Anyway...Regardless of the time we've had the name..Its the most known throughout the world!!!!
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
16 Oct 2010 /  #147
Add Shelley to that.

I did :)

Tombs were robbed

Justifying theft, doesn't make it any less of a theft.
"I robbed him of his millions because he probably wouldn't have spent it properly..."

As much as you hate it

Where did I say I hated it? cheers.

There have been tribes on my Island for over 500,000 years...Angles was the first term which was coined by the Romans...which was in about 55BC.
By the way how long have the Irish been known as "Irish" !!!!!!!!!!

Are you high?
dtaylor5632  18 | 1998  
16 Oct 2010 /  #148
just one or two 0's too many ;) If she was high she would have described the whole 56789BC war between the English humans against the botfly octopus tribes... :P
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
16 Oct 2010 /  #149
There have been tribes on my Island for over 500,000 years.

Earliest findings are from after the last ice age, (approx 9,000 years ago).
Modern day humans originated in Africa about 200,000 years ago.

Angles was the first term which was coined by the Romans.which was in about 55BC.

The Angles is a modern English word for a Germanic-speaking people who took their name from the ancestral cultural region of Angeln, a district located in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. The Angles were one of the main groups that settled in Britain in the post-Roman period, founding several of the kingdoms of Anglo-Saxon England, and their name is the root of the name "England".

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angles

Anglo-Saxon England refers to the period of the history of England that lasts from the end of Roman Britain and the establishment of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms in the 5th century until the Norman conquest of England in 1066. Anglo-Saxon is a general term that refers to the Germanic settlers who came to Britain during the 5th and 6th centuries, including Angles, Saxons, Frisians and Jutes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

By the way how long have the Irish been known as "Irish" !!!!!!!!!!

The words 'Ireland' and 'Irish' come from 'Érainn' - proto-historic period. They arrived in Ireland from the Continent about 500 B.C. (that's 2500 years ago).

Just think Sean, ... we have preserved it and brought the past to life...

Obviously more needs to be done.
Trevek  25 | 1699  
16 Oct 2010 /  #150
It's certainly one of the largest brick ones, and by far the largest from that period - but there aren't that many others.

Well, there's a whole tourist route based on the Teutonic castles in "Prussia". Just off the top of my head I can think of Olsztyn, Olsztynek, Ryn, Węgorzewo, Nidzica, Kętrzyn and those are just the ones I drove past recently.

Then there's all the churches and religious sites up here too.

I get your point about the age and amount, but it's not as if there isn't anything.

Aren't races? God has nothing to do with it.

Arrrgh! It was a joke, OK? It's like a joke about the English thinking they are so superior... and if they think they are 'self-made' then nobody can blame god for them. (Sound of Trevek banging his head against the wall repeatedly whilst muttering, "it was a joke... it was a joke!!!!!")

To all,The topic seems to have expanded beyond 'subtle differences'. Please get back on track. Thank you.

Archives - 2010-2019 / UK, Ireland / The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v PolandArchived