Dirk diggler 10 | 4452
13 Jun 2018 / #61
because I can see how Europe can be a better life for those peoples.
Europe ought to be for europeans first and foremost. Let them fix their own countries and continents instead of leeching off europeans accomplishments
where Europe is severely underpopulated
Europe is not underpopulated that is tired old bullshit lie. And even if european birthrates are falling a program like the 500 zs immediatelt boosted birth rates in poland. There's no need to import third worlders as they are not a net benefit to Europe. That is why countries like germaby are begging others to take in a chunk of them to 'share the burden.' Now if they were such a net benefit for a country politicians wouldnt want to redistribute them and keep them for themselves. But they know that an illiterate third worlder with no skills, who cannot speak the language or wants to learn it and plans on collecting benefits his whole life is not helping the country. That's why they want poland and Hungary to take them in as they already habe enough third worlders living off benefits and opening kebab stands and dont need more.
But of course you and your like don't want others to have a good lifestyle - you want to keep them down.
Of course. In order for one to win another must lose.
The way I see it poland is winning since they haven't taken in third worlders at a huge economic cost to the citizens, haven't had a single islamic terror attack, are not having a crisis of nonstop rapes and dont have tent cities in the middle of warsaw like Paris does. We took in 2 million.migrants - from ukraine not middle East or africa. And because we took in migranrs from ukraine and not me and africa we don't have the problems associated with those migrants. Ukranians work, assimilate and contribute. Middle easterners and africans rape pillage draw benefits and dont want to work or assimilate, and especially middle easterners actuslly the africans assimilate better than the arabs