So now you're moving on to money as a motive
I'm not moving anywhere. You simply failed to convince me to your way of seeing things. A large part of the reason of your failure to do so lays in the fact you came across as arrogant and authoritarian. I don't have to take your word for anything.
On the other hand your inability to understand others could be due to your low IQ, you don't see a need to explain your views to others for whom it might be not so obvious as it seems to you, you don't understand that some people may have a different point of view on the issue, you don't understand inquisitive, for you all is either black or white.
First you* tried the science as a defence for the logging
No, first of I refuted successfully (some might disagree) your claim that supposedly science is on YOUR side in regard to logging or not logging question. The some goes for your laughable claims about UNECO (a political organization) being some kind of an impartial ethereal being, a demigod that can rule the right and wrongs of all things.
Then you moved into the EU law argument which I don't care about. In my opinion the EU has no say or shouldn't have say in the internal Polish affairs.
In fact you are very good in surfing on the surface and saying nothing (mostly repetitive stuff or ad hominem digs that remind me of Harry) while at the same time creating an impression that you say a lot.
You haven't addressed any questions or doubts head on. Your standard response is either to skip the issue, talk around it or use an appeal to authority ( a classic logical fallacy). Didn't they teach you logic at school, Mr Academic title?
though ironically Szyszko gets the money no matter what happens -
Maybe, but than those who oppose him (as we are talking about them) don't get any money if Szyszko keep logging as he does. Can you make an argument that actually make sense rather than shoot yourself in the foot?
I'm grouping you with morons holding academic titles and there plenty of those - unfortunately.