WielkiPolak 54 | 988
6 Apr 2015 / #1
Hi folks. A friend of mine has this English task to do and has asked if I can help them. They have to correct any spelling, grammar and punctuation mistakes. While my English is fine, I would not consider myself a grammatical expert and was wondering if there is anyone here with a little bit of time who is very good at this stuff and could run over this for me and correct it? It's not very long. Some of the mistakes are more obvious, but others I am not sure about.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imaginary Member A: Does the Minister agree that we should put troops on the ground in Syria and Iran to defeat ISUL? Surely it is time that we should?
Imaginary Minister: No. In the first case, we have no mandate: in the last case, the decision is for is the Iraqi Government.
Imaginary Member B: Why have Conservative Back-Benchers opposed the Private Member Bill introduced by my noble friend Lord Pervis of Tweedbank, the International Development (Official Assistance Target) Bill, which would guarantee 7% of our gross product for oversees aid?
Imaginary Minister: That is matter for them.
Imaginary Member C: Will the Goverment set up a statutory inquiry into the failures of East Yorkshire Police in the Rotheram child abuse scandal?
Imaginary Minster: Investigations are being undertaken by the National Crime Association and by Operation Stovepipe, so we see the need for a statuary enquiry at this point.
Imaginary Member C: What is Her Majesty's Government assessment of developments in Southern Sudan, with particular reference to the bombardment of civilians in South Kordoban and Blue Nile states?
Imaginary Minister: We support the meditation work of President Tabho Mbeki's EU panel and to emphasise to all sides that the only resolution to conflict is through political dialogue.
Imaginary Member D: Can the Minister tell us what are the weighting times are for DLA.
Imaginary Minister: As your Lordship's House knows the two processes, for PIP and for DLA are seperate and different contractors operates them. Maximum has come into run the WAC process.
Seems nobody is willing to help, so I have done my best to help her with it. I would like to ask for help with one part.
Imaginary Minister: No. In the first case, we have no mandate: in the last case, the decision is for is the Iraqi Government.
Is there something wrong with the above sentence? I believe some of the punctuation might be off, but would would it be done correctly?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imaginary Member A: Does the Minister agree that we should put troops on the ground in Syria and Iran to defeat ISUL? Surely it is time that we should?
Imaginary Minister: No. In the first case, we have no mandate: in the last case, the decision is for is the Iraqi Government.
Imaginary Member B: Why have Conservative Back-Benchers opposed the Private Member Bill introduced by my noble friend Lord Pervis of Tweedbank, the International Development (Official Assistance Target) Bill, which would guarantee 7% of our gross product for oversees aid?
Imaginary Minister: That is matter for them.
Imaginary Member C: Will the Goverment set up a statutory inquiry into the failures of East Yorkshire Police in the Rotheram child abuse scandal?
Imaginary Minster: Investigations are being undertaken by the National Crime Association and by Operation Stovepipe, so we see the need for a statuary enquiry at this point.
Imaginary Member C: What is Her Majesty's Government assessment of developments in Southern Sudan, with particular reference to the bombardment of civilians in South Kordoban and Blue Nile states?
Imaginary Minister: We support the meditation work of President Tabho Mbeki's EU panel and to emphasise to all sides that the only resolution to conflict is through political dialogue.
Imaginary Member D: Can the Minister tell us what are the weighting times are for DLA.
Imaginary Minister: As your Lordship's House knows the two processes, for PIP and for DLA are seperate and different contractors operates them. Maximum has come into run the WAC process.
Seems nobody is willing to help, so I have done my best to help her with it. I would like to ask for help with one part.
Imaginary Minister: No. In the first case, we have no mandate: in the last case, the decision is for is the Iraqi Government.
Is there something wrong with the above sentence? I believe some of the punctuation might be off, but would would it be done correctly?