PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
   
Archives - 2010-2019 / News  % width 244

4th Polish Republic may re-emerge


delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
12 Jun 2013 /  #181
Even about Hitler on the plus side

Your words.

but you have yet to say a single good word about PiS and the brothers.

Why would I?

The IV Republic left behind nothing but broken promises and people.
OP Polonius3  980 | 12275  
12 Jun 2013 /  #182
So PiS is worse than the NSDAP? Interesting!
Lenka  5 | 3536  
12 Jun 2013 /  #183
So what exactly do they deny and why is it bad ?

Simple idea of IV RP is overthrowing III RP with everything it represents- good and bad. Such behaviour is simply stupid.

I'm not debating Lenka. I'm just saying as it is. 60to 70 % of voters in Poland do not vote.2

True, my bad. But if I'm not mistaken you do sugest that PiS and IV RP are not so popular BECAUSE ppl are ignorant.

77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 777777 77777777777777777777777I - that cat's contribution.

I love it :) My cats are often trying to communicate with PF members as well :)

Lenka if someone is interested in this he/she can find plenty of articles in newspapers or in the Internet about that. There are historical books about that. There is even book written by sociologist professor - Staniszkis. What you are saying is - there have been nothing on TV about that. Yes there were no much about that for a reason. If you don't want to trust somebody you need to secure information and sources on your own.

I'm rather about the fact that changing constitution and "overthrowing" the III RP shouldn't be taken slightly. Isn't it better to just change what is wrong than blowing things up?

So basically you say:
The hell with the things that we all agreed to we will break the deal? Where is honour in that? Would you make buisness with someone with that approach? I wouldn't.
jkb  - | 197  
12 Jun 2013 /  #184
but you have yet to say a single good word about PiS and the brothers

I think the only thing that I can honestly say was good about PiS's rule was reducing the tax progressive scale from 19-30-40 to 18-32. Nothing else was worth these 2 years of mess.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
12 Jun 2013 /  #185
If I recall rightly, wasn't this pretty much a given regardless of who went into power at that point?
OP Polonius3  980 | 12275  
12 Jun 2013 /  #186
What about the upgraded history teaching curriculum? Under tusk it has been watered down. Who needs history? - ask pedestrian PO Poles.
People of culture also say the PiS-led governemtn was better for the nation's culture.
Grzegorz_  51 | 6138  
12 Jun 2013 /  #187
Simple idea of IV RP is overthrowing III RP with everything it represents- good and bad. Such behaviour is simply stupid.

But what exactly they want to overthrown, which is good.
Lenka  5 | 3536  
12 Jun 2013 /  #188
People of culture also say the PiS-led governemtn was better for the nation's culture.

I never heard that one.

But what exactly they want to overthrown, which is good.

For example our constitution which I think is perfectly good.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
12 Jun 2013 /  #189
What about the upgraded history teaching curriculum? Under tusk it has been watered down. Who needs history? - ask pedestrian PO Poles.

The problem was that the curriculum wasn't actually upgraded at all.

People of culture also say the PiS-led governemtn was better for the nation's culture.

I would absolutely love to see some references to that, given the vast amount of opposition within cultural circles to PiS.

I never heard that one.

Me neither. I've got a few friends involved with the Arts and they are all absolutely anti-PiS to the core.

Perhaps Polonius is referring to IV RP types, who of course flourished then as they were rewarded for their political reliability.
jkb  - | 197  
12 Jun 2013 /  #190
What about the upgraded history teaching curriculum?

What our youth needs right now is an upgraded math and science curriculum, cause they are getting out of school completely under-educated in this field. History is important, but its whole material shouldn't be compulsory. You won't feed your kids with history. Math on the other hand is highly practical and useful in a large number of fields. That being said, if a person knows what year did the November uprising happen, but doesn't know how to calculate the area of a rectangle or volume of a cube, the person just finished their high school education as a moron. Making math compulsory on matura is a good first step. Just the difficulty level should be turned up quite a lot to match other matura tests.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
12 Jun 2013 /  #191
History is important, but its whole material shouldn't be compulsory.

What actually makes it far worse is that very little is taught about the post-war era, despite it being of massive importance.

Making math compulsory on matura is a good first step. Just the difficulty level should be turned up quite a lot to match other matura tests.

But but...THEY DIDN'T HAVE COUNTLESS HOURS ABOUT THE PIAST KINGS!
jkb  - | 197  
12 Jun 2013 /  #192
What actually makes it far worse is that very little is taught about the post-war era, despite it being of massive importance.

That's true. Post-war history is virtually nonexistent in history lessons.

But but...THEY DIDN'T HAVE COUNTLESS HOURS ABOUT THE PIAST KINGS!

lol
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
13 Jun 2013 /  #193
Which is tragic, but I guess it avoids the usage of schools as propaganda platforms.
Ironside  50 | 12437  
13 Jun 2013 /  #194
But if I'm not mistaken you do sugest that PiS and IV RP are not so popular BECAUSE ppl are ignorant.

Not only that. PiS exists because people are ignorant and let other rule over them instead of thanking interest in politics and organize themselves, then PiS wouldn't be needed.

I'm rather about the fact that changing constitution and "overthrowing" the III RP shouldn't be taken slightly.

What makes you thing that such thing is taken slightly? Some people who are talking about that have been in politics before you were born.That is only your assumption that somebody want to take rush, or not thought through actions.

Isn't it better to just change what is wrong than blowing things up?

It is not about constitution, bad as it is. That is about changing system ie people who showed their hand overthrowing Olszewski government.

The hell with the things that we all agreed to we will break the deal? Where is honour in that? Would you make buisness with someone with that approach?

No he is saying that whatever deals have been made. Have been made in secret and for that they had no authorization, nor mandate. In fact all so called Round Table have been a deal between Soviets Poles and selected by them people form opposition. Walensa didn't have the right to represent Solidarity.

There were no honor, and there no deal need to honored as they have been made by usurpers and traitors about the nation.
That deal could be have been treated as limited agreement till election not as promise that all Soviet Poles will hold privileged position for ever.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
13 Jun 2013 /  #195
It is not about constitution, bad as it is.

What's wrong with the Constitution?

That is about changing system ie people who showed their hand overthrowing Olszewski government.

That government was shaky enough as it was. You do remember that the 1st placed party in the 1991 election got something like 12% of the national vote, right? It's not as if Olszewski's government was anything special in the way that it fell apart.

No he is saying that whatever deals have been made. Have been made in secret and for that they had no authorization, nor mandate. In fact all so called Round Table have been a deal between Soviets Poles and selected by them people form opposition.

Ho ho ho. Lech Kaczynski was part of the Round Table talks - are we finally seeing an admission that he was handpicked?

Walensa didn't have the right to represent Solidarity.

If Walesa didn't, then who did?

Still, Ironside, while you fight for the IV RP from afar, we'll carry on making the real Polish State a better place to live.
Ironside  50 | 12437  
13 Jun 2013 /  #196
Ho ho ho. Lech Kaczynski was part of the Round Table talks - are we finally seeing an admission that he was handpicked?

everyone taking part in-that has been hand picked but Soviet Poles but not everyone made deal or privet arrangements with them.

If Walesa didn't, then who did?

That for you to check. If you tell me I will debate with you if not - not.For your attitude here and for your words you need to earn the right to debate with me.

Still, Ironside, while you fight for the IV RP from afar, we'll carry on making the real Polish State a better place to live.

Do you watch TV?I would like to point your attention to programs about nature. Specifically to kind of frog that lives in the rain fores. To fool its opponents inflates itself to double or triple of its original size to scare off its opponents. In reality it is nothing but a hot air.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
13 Jun 2013 /  #197
everyone taking part in-that has been hand picked but Soviet Poles but not everyone made deal or privet arrangements with them.

So Lech Kaczynski was hand picked? Hmmm.

That for you to check. If you tell me I will debate with you if not - not.For your attitude here and for your words you need to earn the right to debate with me.

I've got several books on Solidarność and none of them mention anything about a "real" leader of Solidarity. Perhaps you could enlighten us as to why Walesa was negotiating then?
jkb  - | 197  
13 Jun 2013 /  #198
PiS exists because people are ignorant

Spot on. Why else? The sole reason for PiS' existence is the fact that people are ignorant. I don't see any other reason for them to have such large popularity.

That is about changing system ie people who showed their hand overthrowing Olszewski government.

Firstly, was there anything illegal about it? Secondly, was there anything good about Olszewski's government?

No he is saying that whatever deals have been made. Have been made in secret and for that they had no authorization, nor mandate. In fact all so called Round Table have been a deal between Soviets Poles and selected by them people form opposition.

Even if so, it got rid of the old system. For that we should all be grateful.

Walensa didn't have the right to represent Solidarity.

Then who did? And it's Walesa.

What's wrong with the Constitution?

A few things. Like defining marriage as between man and woman only. I agree with Ironside here that this should be changed.

It's not as if Olszewski's government was anything special in the way that it fell apart.

Good riddance basically.

For your attitude here and for your words you need to earn the right to debate with me.

HAHA. Thanks for the good laugh. One indeed must earn their right to descend into the gutter.

Do you watch TV

Well unfortunately, TV in Poland is rather stupifying.

In reality it is nothing but a hot air

Are you trying to say that PiS having so much popularity in opposition is just hot air? I have to agree with that.
delphiandomine  86 | 17823  
13 Jun 2013 /  #199
Firstly, was there anything illegal about it? Secondly, was there anything good about Olszewski's government?

As far as I understand it, it's perfectly legal in Polish politics to bring down Governments. Didn't PiS just try recently to do just that?

As for Olszewski's government - it was always going to be hard to run a Government with such a messy political outcome as the 1991 election.

A few things. Like defining marriage as between man and woman only. I agree with Ironside here that this should be changed.

I never knew Ironside was such a supporter of gay marriage! :)
jkb  - | 197  
13 Jun 2013 /  #200
As far as I understand it, it's perfectly legal in Polish politics to bring down Governments. Didn't PiS just try recently to do just that?

It's part of a democratic process.

As for Olszewski's government - it was always going to be hard to run a Government with such a messy political outcome as the 1991 election.

That's one of the reason why the 5% barrier has been introduced.

I never knew Ironside was such a supporter of gay marriage! :)

Told you, crypto-homosexuality in its finest :)
OP Polonius3  980 | 12275  
13 Jun 2013 /  #201
The present constitution was pushed through by the ex-commies (Kwaśniewski & Co.) with the support of their fellow-travellers from th left-leaning, cosmopolitan KOR-ite 'Unia Rozwolności' (or whatever it was called). The patriotic truly Polish AWS (Solidarity Electoral Action) led by Jerzy Buzek was dead set against it but got outvoted. Unlike normal constitutions it even lacks a clear 'incvocatio Dei' in its preamble.
jkb  - | 197  
13 Jun 2013 /  #202
The patriotic truly Polish AWS (Solidarity Electoral Action) led by Jerzy Buzek was dead set against it but got outvoted.

Buzek £obuzek and his butt buddy "w krzaki z takim". Thanks, but no thanks.

it even lacks a clear 'incvocatio Dei' in its preamble

Why would anyone want to waste paper on that...
Lenka  5 | 3536  
13 Jun 2013 /  #203
The present constitution was pushed through by the ex-commies (Kwaśniewski & Co.) with the support of their fellow-travellers from th left-leaning, cosmopolitan KOR-ite 'Unia Rozwolności' (or whatever it was called). The patriotic truly Polish AWS (Solidarity Electoral Action) led by Jerzy Buzek was dead set against it but got outvoted. Unlike normal constitutions it even lacks a clear 'incvocatio Dei' in its preamble.

The constutution was established if far more democratic way than what they wanted to do- we had a referendum so it wasn't pushed
OP Polonius3  980 | 12275  
13 Jun 2013 /  #204
Polling-station demcoracy is important but the final outcome also depends to a large extent on who has mainstream media support as well as that of other small but wealthy and influential groups. In the US, for instance, if the mainstream media and Hollywood types support something, that is a tremendous boost to that cause. Numerically those elites are not that big, but they have the best potential for swaying or brainwashing the masses.
Lenka  5 | 3536  
13 Jun 2013 /  #205
True, but you still can't say it was "pushed". Ppl in Poland wanted that constitution as to when PiS ruled- changes would have been made through Sejm so normal ppl wouldn't be allowed to express their opinion. Which way is more "pushy" ?
Ironside  50 | 12437  
13 Jun 2013 /  #206
Told you, crypto-homosexuality in its finest :)

you know a thing or two about that right?

Buzek £obuzek and his butt buddy "w krzaki z takim". Thanks, but no thanks.

You are a true Tuskitie then, do you lick his buts every-so often?

The constutution was established if far more democratic way than what they wanted to do- we had a referendum so it wasn't pushed

No problem referendum could be held for a new Constitution.
jkb  - | 197  
13 Jun 2013 /  #207
you know a thing or two about that right?

Not from my own perspective, but looking at people like you, yeah. I can tell.

You are a true Tuskitie then, do you lick his buts every-so often?

A Tuskite that doesn't like or support Tusk. That must be a new thing.

No problem referendum could be held for a new Constitution.

Just like it was before.
Lenka  5 | 3536  
13 Jun 2013 /  #208
No problem referendum could be held for a new Constitution.

If that was the case and Poles decided they want the new constitution I would accept it even if I didn't like the changes. However that wasn't the case and PiS never got the 2/3 support in Sejm it needed to change it.
Ironside  50 | 12437  
13 Jun 2013 /  #209
Not from my own perspective, but looking at people like you, yeah. I can tell.

good for you, what else can you tell? Can you see the wall before you crash into it? brilliant!

A Tuskite that doesn't like or support Tusk. That must be a new thing.

No really he ****** a few people and then kicked them out. It fairly common occurrence in PO echelons by now.

However that wasn't the case and PiS never got the 2/3 support in Sejm it needed to change it.

If they get majority - what is the problem?
I don't understand that confusion with Constitution, hey that Poland. That really do not matter right? The state ie government con do anything as long as got majority and support of the media like PO. They are doing all they want right now and people are just being silly if they think that some law is protecting them.
jkb  - | 197  
13 Jun 2013 /  #210
good for you

glad you admit it

No really he ****** a few people and then kicked them out. It fairly common occurrence in PO echelons by now.

If you say so. I don't support PO, not my problem.

Archives - 2010-2019 / News / 4th Polish Republic may re-emergeArchived